Terrorist Sympathizer Obama Has DHS Delete Terrorist's Records!

a reply to: Gryphon66

Just posting links. I have no evidence of anything. And apparently you don't either.

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: Gryphon66

Just posting links. I have no evidence of anything. And apparently you don't either.

I'll let what I've posted stand for itself, mostly because it seems to gall.

You have no evidence. You don't stand behind your source in your OP. You're really just trolling your own thread.

/shrug

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: Gryphon66

So...none of that proof huh?

You certainly have none, and more than that, you've basically admitted that you don't even stand behind the article.

There are words for such, that T&C prevent me from stating clearly.

Dude...I thought you had a point to make and had some of that evidence you like to demand. If you have none...I guess your just blowing hot air as usual. Your opinion is no better nor worse than mine with out either of us having evidence. The difference is you demand it...and I realize the difference between fact and opinion. You might want to look those up. There is a book called a dictionary assuming you know what that is.

a reply to: Gryphon66

How can I stand behind something I have no proof about? I posted a news story from a news source and stated my opinion. You didn't like it and whined for five pages

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: Gryphon66

So...none of that proof huh?

You certainly have none, and more than that, you've basically admitted that you don't even stand behind the article.

There are words for such, that T&C prevent me from stating clearly.

Dude...I thought you had a point to make and had some of that evidence you like to demand. If you have none...I guess your just blowing hot air as usual. Your opinion is no better nor worse than mine with out either of us having evidence. The difference is you demand it...and I realize the difference between fact and opinion. You might want to look those up. The is a book called a dictionary assuming you know what that is.

Show us some of that evidence then.

Demonstrate that Philip Haney is telling the truth about even one claim he has made.

a reply to: Gryphon66

What part of I HAVE NO EVIDENCE doesn't get through your thick skull? All I know is a reputable news source posted this story and I voiced my opinion. How many times must I say the same thing before you get it? Do I need to use smaller words or something?

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: stevieray

I wish that I could express exactly how untroubled I am by your opinion.

I regularly read what you write and find no point whatsoever. /shrug

The fact is that I made a simple comparison. Does Westboro's (a small percentage of Christians) philosophy or actions completely represent all Christianity? If not (and it doesn't) then the actions of a small percentage of Muslims across the world does not represent all Islam. Therefore, there's little to no reason to talk about the religion of terrorists except as part of a political agenda ... which is the basis of your comment.

Westboros aren't a small percentage. They are a minute speck of sand in the ocean. Add in your buddy's "Africans" and "abortionist killers", and you may have 2 specks in the ocean.

Meanwhile, a "small percentage of muslims killing people" is several or many millions.

There's no way any of you are serious or sincere with this comparison. Just the D3. Deny, derail, distort.

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: Gryphon66

What part of I HAVE NO EVIDENCE doesn't get through your thick skull? All I know is a reputable news source posted this story and I voiced my opinion. How many times must I say the same thing before you get it? Do I need to use smaller words or something?

Further evidence that it's not about the subject, or even being right or wrong.

It's all about the seething anger that people won't agree with them, especially when they're totally wrong.

a reply to: stevieray

Whose wrong and about what?

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: Gryphon66

How can I stand behind something I have no proof about? I posted a news story from a news source and stated my opinion. You didn't like it and whined for five pages

You have no proof. That's really all you needed to say. You have nothing.

I showed that the only record of Philip Haney's association with the government is with the Department of Agriculture.

I researched the "letter" provided as "proof" and clearly (and exhaustively demonstrated) that while there are some verifiable facts (and provided links to them) there is really nothing to substantiate that Philip Haney is who he says he is.

I've demonstrated that Philip Haney is a radicalized Fundamentalist Christian associated with a group or church that are profound believers in apocalyptic Islamophobia.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: Gryphon66

Just posting links. I have no evidence of anything. And apparently you don't either.

I'll let what I've posted stand for itself, mostly because it seems to gall.

You have no evidence. You don't stand behind your source in your OP. You're really just trolling your own thread.

/shrug

You post what you post "to gall".

Yet someone else is trolling.

Most of the stuff you guys do and say in these threads is supposed to be embarrassing.

Yet we see that it isn't, in most of the threads that several of you treat us to.

ATTENTION!

As you all know the topic is NEVER EACH OTHER OR OPINIONS OF EACH OTHER.

If you do not have anything to say that is on topic, please move on to something else before posting bans are necessary.

Do not reply to this post.

Blaine91555
Moderator

I was asked a question and I answered. Addressing no one in particular.

Finally...so back to the subject. If it turns out the whistle-blower is correct and can substantiate his position, what should be done to punish the administration? Is this grounds for impeachment...is this an act that falls under the definition of a "traitor"?

The long and short of it is, either these people are doing these things, or they're not. Nobody on ATS knows, or will prove it, either way.

Somebody somewhere will prove something, or they won't.

If proven, somebody will either do something about it, or they won't.

Just about exactly where we are with e-mails/ servers, Benghazi, IRS, Fast & Furious, and so on.

originally posted by: cavtrooper7

Dissolve them and put that cash to the military budget.

The U.S. military budget is already obscenely overblown.
That is part of the whole problem, for those that can't see...