It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: creation7
a reply to: mapsurfer_
ya, the other half of my genetic origin is Pottawatomie NA, Korean and English. I only wrote the genetics of one parent that you are replying too. I live in Hawaii, crime is relatively low, but I think thats an economic issue more.
As far as what I fill in on a document requesting race, I mark Caucasian or white, because I have more of those ethnic backgrounds than any other, though if you saw me in person one would say I may appear Asian, albeit with brownish blond hair and hazel eyes. Like you say its rather arbitrary to only have one choice and its open to misuse
originally posted by: DexterRiley
a reply to: mapsurfer_
The admixture information is basically just the old divisions of the races. Essentially it's the scientific equivalent of the racial definitions you were talking about earlier.
In another section there is a lot more information about the origins of various segments of the molecular DNA. This is much more detailed view of geographic origins. A significant portion of my DNA originates in Ireland. Another point of origin in on the W. Coast of the African Continent in the area of Cameroon. Then there are other contributions from various sources.
23andMe has a much more detailed test available now than the test we took a few years ago. It's actually pretty cheap compared to what I payed. I haven't checked on it lately, but I think it's around $200.
These chips they are using to perform the DNA analysis are more or less comodity these days. But LEO forensics probably requires a higher standard that what these devices are rated. That's just a guess.
originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: mapsurfer_
Yes there is no such things as race peeps have been trying a long time to classify but to not scientific avail. If there is no such thing as race then terms like race are if you think about it racist by definition..
there are no sub species for humans we are all humans..
I think the claim is that the CODIS markers contain no useful information about the phenotypical expression of the criminal's DNA. I wasn't aware that the mtDNA and Y-STR results were also being stored in the NDIS system. That information could be used, minimally, to determine the appearance of an individual. However, they are passed along, relatively unchanged, from generation to generation. So, it's likely that other molecular DNA sequences would play a much greater role in defining the characteristics of the suspect.
Ok the LEO DNA forensics is the CODIS and NDIS system which is of course a classified access, has around 12million offender records with metadata. The wiki page has a list of the 13 STR loci, Y-STR, mDNA markers they use, but no where does it actually describe the capabilites of the analysis. I got the number of one of the CODIS labs, but no idea if they will talk to me about DNA analysis unless it is a LEO related request.
originally posted by: Nochzwei
race was never a myth and never will be. In the Bible it states 'each shall marry after his own kind'. dna is taking race out of the equation to be politically correct, nothing else. French perfume manufacturers test and make perfumes based on race as each race smells different.
a reply to: mapsurfer_