It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
as people are arguing back and forth over the legality issues of the roadblock used to stop mr Finicum
i have one observation - an utter lack of any case law challenging the legality of using roadblocks
still think they are illegal ?
what specifically do you think is illegal about this one ?
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: Indigo5
Just to be clear...and this is why the BS bothers me...
Victoria Sharp is the eye-witness the Militia has put forward
at 1:36
Do you know if any of them had a gun?
Victoria: "I know that LaVoy had a gun holstered"..."I know that Ryan Payne had a gun holstered" etc. etc.
Just to be clear...
Do you know the different from a gun and a gun holstered?
Can you post where Victoria said Lavoy WAS carrying his gun?
Because it is my understanding that all of them left their guns at the refuge.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
as people are arguing back and forth over the legality issues of the roadblock used to stop mr Finicum
i have one observation - an utter lack of any case law challenging the legality of using roadblocks
still think they are illegal ?
what specifically do you think is illegal about this one ?
originally posted by: spy66
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
as people are arguing back and forth over the legality issues of the roadblock used to stop mr Finicum
i have one observation - an utter lack of any case law challenging the legality of using roadblocks
still think they are illegal ?
what specifically do you think is illegal about this one ?
According to Oregon state constitution... roadblocks are illigal. There have been no changes made.
To have one issued to stop this suspect, you would probably need a very very good legal reason. If something is illigal you would need a strong legal argument.
What would that be?
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: spy66
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
as people are arguing back and forth over the legality issues of the roadblock used to stop mr Finicum
i have one observation - an utter lack of any case law challenging the legality of using roadblocks
still think they are illegal ?
what specifically do you think is illegal about this one ?
According to Oregon state constitution... roadblocks are illigal. There have been no changes made.
To have one issued to stop this suspect, you would probably need a very very good legal reason. If something is illigal you would need a strong legal argument.
What would that be?
DUI checkpoints are unconstitutional according to Oregon state law. Unless you have specific language that cites using a roadblock to stop a driver during the course of effecting an arrest, I call complete BS on this claim of yours.
Furthermore, federal rulings have determined that DUI checkpoints are not a violation of the 4th amendment, so if the roadblock was put in place by, and manned by, FBI agents then Oregon law regarding DUI checkpoints is utterly and completely moot.
originally posted by: spy66
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: spy66
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
as people are arguing back and forth over the legality issues of the roadblock used to stop mr Finicum
i have one observation - an utter lack of any case law challenging the legality of using roadblocks
still think they are illegal ?
what specifically do you think is illegal about this one ?
According to Oregon state constitution... roadblocks are illigal. There have been no changes made.
To have one issued to stop this suspect, you would probably need a very very good legal reason. If something is illigal you would need a strong legal argument.
What would that be?
DUI checkpoints are unconstitutional according to Oregon state law. Unless you have specific language that cites using a roadblock to stop a driver during the course of effecting an arrest, I call complete BS on this claim of yours.
Furthermore, federal rulings have determined that DUI checkpoints are not a violation of the 4th amendment, so if the roadblock was put in place by, and manned by, FBI agents then Oregon law regarding DUI checkpoints is utterly and completely moot.
I Guess this site is wrong about Oregon Sobriety checkpoints (also called DUI checkpoints) then.
Look for Your self, it is stated Down on the page.
www.ghsa.org...
I did post where Victoria said LaVoy was carrying a gun ...right there in the post you responded to, transcript plus audio???
Seriously...what is up with that???
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: Indigo5
I did post where Victoria said LaVoy was carrying a gun ...right there in the post you responded to, transcript plus audio???
Seriously...what is up with that???
You need to watch your own video, Victoria was asked, were they carrying guns? Her answers were, I DON'T KNOW.
I am asking everyone to watch this video and please show at what time mark does Victoria said they were all caring guns to this meeting?
Section 9. Unreasonable searches or seizures. No law shall violate the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search, or seizure; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath, or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or thing to be seized.—
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: spy66
According to Oregon state constitution... roadblocks are illigal.
Funny how you are unable to show us exactly where that is stated in their constitution....
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: spy66
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
as people are arguing back and forth over the legality issues of the roadblock used to stop mr Finicum
i have one observation - an utter lack of any case law challenging the legality of using roadblocks
still think they are illegal ?
what specifically do you think is illegal about this one ?
According to Oregon state constitution... roadblocks are illigal. There have been no changes made.
To have one issued to stop this suspect, you would probably need a very very good legal reason. If something is illigal you would need a strong legal argument.
What would that be?
DUI checkpoints are unconstitutional according to Oregon state law. Unless you have specific language that cites using a roadblock to stop a driver during the course of effecting an arrest, I call complete BS on this claim of yours.
Furthermore, federal rulings have determined that DUI checkpoints are not a violation of the 4th amendment, so if the roadblock was put in place by, and manned by, FBI agents then Oregon law regarding DUI checkpoints is utterly and completely moot.
originally posted by: spy66
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: spy66
According to Oregon state constitution... roadblocks are illigal.
Funny how you are unable to show us exactly where that is stated in their constitution....
Why do i have to look for it. Dam all you People do is hang around and deny.
For effs sake...........AGAIN
at 1:36
Did you see any of the men with a gun on their person or in their holsters..
Victoria: "I know that LaVoy had a gun holstered"..."I know that Ryan Payne had a gun, it was also holstered, I can't remember if Ryan (other Ryan in car) had a gun or not" "Shawna didn't have a gun" etc. etc.
WHY DO YOU KEEP MAKING STUFF UP?
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
as people are arguing back and forth over the legality issues of the roadblock used to stop mr Finicum
i have one observation - an utter lack of any case law challenging the legality of using roadblocks
still think they are illegal ?
what specifically do you think is illegal about this one ?