Hillary Clinton Has The Most Statistically Improbable Coin-Toss Luck Ever

a reply to: sputniksteve

Shouldn't the fact that Republican and Democrat votes are tallied using different methods be enough for you? Why can't the Republicans be allowed to form groups and discuss issues and candidates and have their votes counted the way the Democrats do?

Isn't is obvious that the democrat party is completely corrupt in the first place and it's completely accepted by the caucus.
Coin flips? Really?

How has this country gotten so far off the track?

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Aazadan

Given percentages...Hillary had a 1.56% chance of winning all six of six.

EDIT:

Hillary:
50% winning first toss
25% winning second toss in a row
12.5% winning third toss in a row
6.25% winning fourth toss in a row
3.125% winning fifth toss in a row
1.56% winning sixth toss in a row

Also given a 50/50 chance of each toss coming up for one or the other...Sanders should've won, at best, 3 of 6.
Had that happened, he would've won Iowa.

Was bernie playing?

Who picks heads six times in a row?

LOL!!

I'm disappointed by the fact that it is the year 2016 we have drones, space travel to vast distances, and we can transplant body parts from one person to another, yet we still decide something as important as a Presidential nominee by flipping a coin?????

originally posted by: Dutchowl
The puppet masters that Hillary and the Bushes( who are higher up in the pecking order) and Obama( who is owned completely and is like a pet) are part of that cult that serve Mammon, the God of Money. So maybe its a message to us that Hillary owes everything to money. Maybe the higher powers are giving us a warning about Hillary.

The Clintons, Bushes, and even Obama's family (Dunham-Goeldner) can all be traced backed to the same CIA money making machine called PROMIS and the core banking system installer called 'Systematics, Inc.' in Little Rock Arkansas.

If you aren't familiar with Obama's close familial ties to that company see this thread: PROMIS, Systematics, and Obama's Uncle Cecil Goeldner

a reply to: burgerbuddy

I think she just picked heads once for all the tosses.

Oh...that sounds pervvy now that I think about it.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Thanks for the info. Look forward to checking it out.

originally posted by: anonentity
just remember its not your country anymore, so mind your manners.

May I steal this quote for my signature? I may finally relinquish what little remaining iota of hope I held for the functioning of our political process come November (or, the way things are going, prior) and need it as a handy reminder.

Peace.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
LOL...So Hillary won 6 out of 6 coin toss ties (calling heads)...and that allowed her to beat Sanders in Iowa last night.
What are the odds? According to the math, a highly improbable 1 in 64!
Wow...Hillary is one lucky lady.
Of course, her integrity and that of her campaign is above reproach.

Actually 1 in 64 is far from "highly improbable"...a whole lot more like "somewhat uncommon". "Highly improbable" is more for something like meeting ET face to face.

So what the "Hill" has done, is rather more common and quite plausible...albeit unfortunate...

a reply to: tanka418

Sure. We'll just say the "Hill" is somewhat uncommonly lucky.

originally posted by: Flavian
a reply to: IAMTAT

It could be correct. Totally different environement but my old amateur football team once won every coin toss for 2 seasons (same captain for every coin toss). That was always with coins supplied by the referee's so nothing dodgy going on, just incredibly lucky.

Although, it must be noted, the same captain that won every coin toss was useless at poker and always lost on the slot gamblers in the club house, so maybe not that lucky!

If it was that close in a primary, they would just pull a bush 43 2000 and appoint her. But I don't think it would come to that now-a-days. They got the voting machine fraud thing down pat.

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: amazing
I used to think the Republican side of American politics was the shady side...you know Florida and Al Gore, but...now I know for sure that Democrats are way, way shadier this year. Good lord!

The Republicans just schooled the Democrats on how to run a good clean Caucus. Lord help us!

Good clean caucus? Republicans? With Cruz taking votes from Carson by falsely claiming Carson suspended his campaign? Give me a break. One party is dirty as the other. Politics as usual.

Haha. I didn't realize Cruz did that! Oh man!

a reply to: amazing

CNN made the announcement Carson was leaving first....but let's stay on topic.

a reply to: IAMTAT

It just seems contrived, the coin toss.

a reply to: Staroth

Apparently, it's a time-honored practice...at least in Iowa.
I would be very surprised if, in the past, anyone else ever won 6 out of 6.

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: amazing
I used to think the Republican side of American politics was the shady side...you know Florida and Al Gore, but...now I know for sure that Democrats are way, way shadier this year. Good lord!

The Republicans just schooled the Democrats on how to run a good clean Caucus. Lord help us!

Eh, yes I think the Democrat elite are shady. But the Republicans? At least the Democrat elite have the sense to lie about serving the American people and caring about the poor and world. The Republicans just tell the real policies straight out with no shame, lol!

And lying about being a POS is somehow better than being upfront about being a POS?

Jesus.

I was obviously joking. However, I do think the Democrats are the "lesser of two evils." They support the evils of empire such as domestic spying or endless wars, but their policies on average on the domestic front are better for the common person than the Republicans. The Republicans are for the same evils but also propose policies on the social fronts that are only good for the rich, and environmental policies that are not good for anybody..

That makes no sense. The lying POSs are just as bad as the blatant POSs.

You are obviously in denial about how democrats have become war-mongering neocons.

There is no lesser nor greater evil between the two parties. One party just tells lies you like to hear.

Sorry. But that seems apparent from what you have posted.

a reply to: AceWombat04


Of course you can, be my guest.

So after some long hard deliberation I've come up with the only true and fair way to determine caucus nominations.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: AceWombat04


Of course you can, be my guest.

Thank-you. It feels increasingly applicable, sadly.

Peace.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Despite the obvious, it's always nice to see that they are literally willing to gamble our futures away. Looks like we may lose again.

a reply to: IAMTAT

This must be how they're writing laws now, too.

Nothing like a classic coin toss to run countries!

The sheer stupidity and in-depth discussion of a ridiculous coin toss should be revolution inducing, armed and violent.