It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Annee
It doesn't make sense.
Here's a woman, who's been politics all her life, who knows she's possibly going to be the first woman president of the USA.
And she's going to blow that opportunity by sending incriminating emails?
originally posted by: Annee
It doesn't make sense.
Here's a woman, who's been politics all her life, who knows she's possibly going to be the first woman president of the USA.
And she's going to blow that opportunity by sending incriminating emails?
The State Department is lying. Hillary is lying. Obama is lying. Something is very very wrong!
originally posted by: xuenchen
here's the link to most of Hillary's emails released by the State Department ...
click in the blank areas under :Subject: or on the diagonal arrows to the right.
Tons of censored material.
So I guess that means it's all an illusion eh.
Hillary emails
originally posted by: Annee
It doesn't make sense.
Here's a woman, who's been politics all her life, who knows she's possibly going to be the first woman president of the USA.
And she's going to blow that opportunity by sending incriminating emails?
originally posted by: queenofswords
Makes you wonder if they wanted to be hacked, doesn't it. Are we living in a NEW AGE of espionage techniques? One where it becomes impossible to prove?
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Annee
It doesn't make sense.
Here's a woman, who's been politics all her life, who knows she's possibly going to be the first woman president of the USA.
And she's going to blow that opportunity by sending incriminating emails?
There is also the question of how much she has already gotten away with in the past and how much she expects people to let her get away with.
Understand that the upper network covers you to a certain point because you know things about them and they about you, not because people are actually necessarily innocent.
It's all a big ol' good ole boys' club (with power players in every gender of course).
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: butcherguy
That is true, but it was never stripped of headers and sent nonsecure. It was sent through proper channels.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: derfreebie
our old buddy Paul Powell.
a great leader indeed.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: butcherguy
That is true, but it was never stripped of headers and sent nonsecure. It was sent through proper channels.
Yes....
So that means her urging a subordinate to do something unlawful makes her as pure as the wind-driven snow?????????
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Annee
It doesn't make sense.
Here's a woman, who's been politics all her life, who knows she's possibly going to be the first woman president of the USA.
And she's going to blow that opportunity by sending incriminating emails?
Annee, that is the problem, she sees herself above the law.
originally posted by: queenofswords
Makes you wonder if they wanted to be hacked, doesn't it. Are we living in a NEW AGE of espionage techniques? One where it becomes impossible to prove?
originally posted by: derfreebie
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: derfreebie
our old buddy Paul Powell.
a great leader indeed.
WINNER WINNER IOU a fifth of single malt Chicken broth at least!
For the spectators close in and impersonal to this national debacle:
Hugh Rodham had this little girl in Chicago. And she learned her
crafts well. In fact I'm getting a little sick of Chicago style politics
infiltrated into our basic federal operations; including foreign
policy. It's worse than if Truman appointed Meyer Lansky Sec of
the Treasury FFS. Hey run me off another case of 50's willya? sigh.