Take the 2016 Presidential Poll: From AboveTopSecret.com and Disinfo.com

a reply to: Loadstain

I noticed the same thing. That's convenient.

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Cobaltic1978

Something is wrong with the poll anyways. Trump was ahead 106 to 100 last time I looked. Now Sanders is ahead 129 - 82.

LOL. 'Feel the Scam'!

a reply to: Loadstain

Probably how the voting always works when people are voting in a poll between Trump and Sanders/Clinton. This is the first one I've gotten to vote in.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Alright, now I'm beginning to get freaked out, lol... That's two in a row where another poster said basically exactly what I said haha... Definitely feel the scam though!

a reply to: Restricted

5 years older than Trump.

6 years older than Clinton.

Anyone else find it fitting that there's no "none of the above" option at a site called Disinfo.com?

I mean, come on. The fact that our so-called "choices" are predetermined and paraded around to make it look as though we have free choices is Waking Up 101.

They're reinforcing the illusion while trying to make us believe they're working to tear it down.

Why are polls like this always done on weekday afternoons, and close before the end of a normal office work day?
From what I see, it looks like this poll ends at 4PM CT. Doesn't that introduce a bit of bias?

originally posted by: NthOther
Anyone else find it fitting that there's no "none of the above" option at a site called disinfo.com?

I mean, come on. The fact that our so-called "choices" are predetermined and paraded around to make it look as though we have free choices is Waking Up 101.

They're reinforcing the illusion while trying to make us believe they're working to tear it down.

Doesn't even matter. Trump lost over 30 votes while Bernie gained over 30. The poll has a malfunction, or a socialist glitch in it.

Sanders and Trump way ahead of everyone else.

AS it should be on ATS. None of us want the same old crap. Sanders and Trump are both refreshing, despite some of their policies. I'm very, very glad to see that Hillary and Bush are so far down as to be non existent. LOL

If only the main stream voters felt this way, I think they do, but we're definitely more well informed. We at least get into more discussions and generally talk about issues and why we don't like a particular candidate. and why we do. I'm surprised Rand Paul isn't higher?

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

Who do you reckon will be next president SO?

originally posted by: Oleman
Why are polls like this always done on weekday afternoons, and close before the end of a normal office work day?
From what I see, it looks like this poll ends at 4PM CT. Doesn't that introduce a bit of bias?

You already missed the good part.

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: SkepticOverlord

Sad.......None of the above wasn't included.

No doubt. I think that's where most people actually are. At least most of the the people I know in real life.

originally posted by: Restricted
Commie, Socialist - damn near the same thing.

There's one in the WH now and he is a disaster on two legs.

I'm in a lunatic asylum here. I can't explain the extreme stupidity of the American voter any other way.

Pass me some Prozac . . . Or Xanax or something.

God help us all.

I wonder who you're voting for.
I'm going to guess Cruz or trump. Maybe even Christie.

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein

originally posted by: Restricted
Commie, Socialist - damn near the same thing.

There's one in the WH now and he is a disaster on two legs.

I'm in a lunatic asylum here. I can't explain the extreme stupidity of the American voter any other way.

Pass me some Prozac . . . Or Xanax or something.

God help us all.

I wonder who you're voting for.
I'm going to guess Cruz or trump. Maybe even Christie.

None of your bloody business, but it certainly won't be a Commie.

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Cobaltic1978

Something is wrong with the poll anyways. Trump was ahead 106 to 100 last time I looked. Now Sanders is ahead 129 - 82.

Why hasn't this been explained yet?
Clearly, the results are being manipulated. Others here have also noticed he same shuffling of numbers.

originally posted by: amazing

If only the main stream voters felt this way, I think they do, but we're definitely more well informed.

I'm sure that we are better informed. I can tell just from the thread titles

1. Guy today suggests the Nazis actually won WW II.
2. Many threads in the past on the fact that Hillary is a reptilian.
3. Guy suggests if your bill comes up a $6.66 you should force the waiter to change it.
4. Dr. Greer held an alien baby in his arms..hundreds of supporters on ATS
5. Chemtrails
6. Ron Paul will win.
7. Data's head is on the moon, and
8. Sasquatch's live on Mars.
9. The planes that hit the twin towers were actually holographic projections.

We can go on and on about the type of material that gets put up here on ATS and defended by its members as reality. Is the ATS populace more interested than the general populace in conspiracy theories, NWO, UFOs, Illuminati, etc.?

Sure.

But is the ATS populace better informed?

Assuredly not.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Why hasn't this been explained yet?
Clearly, the results are being manipulated. Others here have also noticed he same shuffling of numbers.

Suspicious manipulation of data on a conspiracy site? Nah....

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

I wouldn't vote for any of the scumbags in your poll. Can we have an option to write someone in or vote for "other" or none of the above?

originally posted by: SkepticOverlord

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Why is Bloomberg listed?

New York’s Bloomberg eyes presidential race (again)

He has until March to establish an independent run, and the rumors are strong that he's going to do it.

Oh wow, a man who believes he can regulate the size of drinks people can buy.

Imagine what he could do at the federal executive level.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: IAMTAT

Why hasn't this been explained yet?
Clearly, the results are being manipulated. Others here have also noticed he same shuffling of numbers.

Suspicious manipulation of data on a conspiracy site? Nah....

So you're saying the poll is intentionally 'Bogus'. I agree.