Take the 2016 Presidential Poll: From AboveTopSecret.com and Disinfo.com

Sanders in the lead! Feel the Bern!

Commie, Socialist - damn near the same thing.

There's one in the WH now and he is a disaster on two legs.

I'm in a lunatic asylum here. I can't explain the extreme stupidity of the American voter any other way.

Pass me some Prozac . . . Or Xanax or something.

God help us all.

i like clinton's foreign policy over sanders but sanders seems like he'd bring the most good. id give up pot for middle east support, seems like a selfless no brainer.

kinda a mistake polling a conspiracy website though, most people here are conservatives it seems like.

It would have been nice to have a "none of the above" option. I had to pick someone just to see the results so far. I wouldn't vote for any of these "lizards". Sorry to insult lizards.

originally posted by: Bennyzilla
a reply to: ForteanOrg

No and that's why the results will be skewed

Fun way to see where everybody is at within these two websites though.

With so many UK members, I'd imagine the results will lean towards Sanders, or away from Trump.

With my vote, top two:

Sanders: 92
Trump: 76

originally posted by: SkepticOverlord

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Why is Bloomberg listed?

New York’s Bloomberg eyes presidential race (again)

He has until March to establish an independent run, and the rumors are strong that he's going to do it.

Hell yeee, that would be awesome!

originally posted by: reldra
Feel the Bern!

That can be treated with a single shot of an antibiotic called ceftriaxone along with a second oral antibiotic such as azithromycin or doxycycline.

Now Trump leads Sanders 106 - 100.

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

Where is the "none of the above/abstain" selection?

originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: Restricted
The answer to the first question is "almost everyone."

Only in your small world, but the real one is a whole lot bigger, and in that bigger one "almost everyone" does not apply to Sanders. If the national polls are any indication (not this silly, skewed, unscientific ATS one) then Sanders has arguably half or so of the Democrats, which certainly must include the left wingers as well as the many Dems that are not so much for Sanders as against Hillary. And, of course, you've got the GOP and right wing crowd that most assuredly is completely against Sanders and what he stands for.

Add all that up and "almost everyone" is a joke. It's beyond hyperbole and is not in the least credible.

A more sober and realistic assessment is that Sanders appears to be doing very well in the early polling, and if he manages to pull off a few wins he could even manage to secure the Democratic nomination. This would delight the GOP, which would much rather run against him than Clinton.

The enthusiasm for Sanders we are seeing this election cycle feels very much like the Ron Paul crowd last time. Lots of smoke and cheerleading---and 118 total delegates.

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: Restricted
The answer to the first question is "almost everyone."

Only in your small world, but the real one is a whole lot bigger, and in that bigger one "almost everyone" does not apply to Sanders. If the national polls are any indication (not this silly, skewed, unscientific ATS one) then Sanders has arguably half or so of the Democrats, which certainly must include the left wingers as well as the many Dems that are not so much for Sanders as against Hillary. And, of course, you've got the GOP and right wing crowd that most assuredly is completely against Sanders and what he stands for.

Add all that up and "almost everyone" is a joke. It's beyond hyperbole and is not in the least credible.

A more sober and realistic assessment is that Sanders appears to be doing very well in the early polling, and if he manages to pull off a few wins he could even manage to secure the Democratic nomination. This would delight the GOP, which would much rather run against him than Clinton.

The enthusiasm for Sanders we are seeing this election cycle feels very much like the Ron Paul crowd last time. Lots of smoke and cheerleading---and 118 total delegates.

They're probably waiting to see what happens to hillary.

a reply to: SkepticOverlord
I'd go with Rand Paul but I doubt he'd ever get it. My second choice is non of the above.

a reply to: Restricted

That's exactly how I feel about Trump, but replace Commie with any negative connotation.

Okay, I cast my vote for Hillary.
JK.

Sanders is TOO OLD!

It would be interesting to have a First Choice/Second Choice option. I suspect candidates like O'Malley and Christie would suddenly "pop," as they say.

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Is this one of those polls where you can vote more than once?

If you change browsers, yes. It just tracks by cookies.

I don't think it is meant to be taken seriously, after all it's not just members who are able to vote.

I think this is more about the continuing collaborations with disinfo.com.

Maybe it's a disinfo.com expose?

I'm really surprised anyone would vote for Bloomberg. None for Kasich is surprising too.

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

It appears votes are disappearing ? When i first voted, Trump was leading with 132 votes, Sanders had 127. Now Trump only has 82?

a reply to: Cobaltic1978

Something is wrong with the poll anyways. Trump was ahead 106 to 100 last time I looked. Now Sanders is ahead 129 - 82.