It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Nochzwei
This is bound to fail. Electromagnets cannot bend space any more than large inertial masses can
Everything bends space. Maybe even space.
originally posted by: beenharmed
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Nochzwei
This is bound to fail. Electromagnets cannot bend space any more than large inertial masses can
Everything bends space. Maybe even space.
If you remove atmospheric mass...wouldn't space as a force holding the cold gases around Earth, cause space to fall in if the outside Earth gases remain heated as changed pressure?
originally posted by: Nochzwei
No it doesn't. Read the thread in my signature
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Nochzwei
This is bound to fail. Electromagnets cannot bend space any more than large inertial masses can
Everything bends space. Maybe even space.
...a message on Twitter from an Arizona State University cosmologist, Lawrence Krauss, has sparked a firestorm of speculation and excitement.
Krauss does not work with the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory, or LIGO, which is searching for ripples in the fabric of space and time.
But he tweeted on Monday about the apparent shoring up of rumor he'd heard some months ago, that LIGO scientists were writing up a paper on gravitational waves they had discovered using US-based detectors.
"My earlier rumor about LIGO has been confirmed by independent sources. Stay tuned! Gravitational waves may have been discovered!! Exciting," Krauss tweeted.
His message has since between retweeted 1,800 times.
If gravitational waves have been spotted, it would confirm a final missing piece in what Albert Einstein predicted a century ago in his theory of general relativity.
originally posted by: greenreflections
I dont think humanity can beat gravity any time soon. Well, levitating probably possible but strictly anti gravity is not unless a device that manipulates space-time geometry is placed in front of the space ship.
sounds actually silly, because there has to be another lead space ship with the device on board that allows mather ships to start to 'fall' into altered space-time.))))
But may be then, here on Earth it can be done for lifting something off the ground this way. Imagine network of satellites in geocentric orbit that would generate and initiate that king of space-time geometry manipulation for air travel or transport for example here on Earth.
Or imagine the highways with generators placed like light poles and cars flying along above the ground.
))
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: beenharmed
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Nochzwei
This is bound to fail. Electromagnets cannot bend space any more than large inertial masses can
Everything bends space. Maybe even space.
If you remove atmospheric mass...wouldn't space as a force holding the cold gases around Earth, cause space to fall in if the outside Earth gases remain heated as changed pressure?
What? Space isn't some 'force', nor does it hold anything around the Earth. The atmosphere is 'held' in place by Earth's gravity. Space does not and can not "fall in" either. This is elementary school level science stuff here...
The rest of your post isn't even worth addressing, as it doesn't make a lick of sense.
originally posted by: Nochzwei
When exactly were these gravitational waves detected?
Interpreting everything under the sun to suit GR seems to be the norm with MS
a reply to: DJW001
originally posted by: beenharmed
Why has archaeology suddenly discovered ancient remnants that determine that the ancient practice of using nuclear dust in Ark of the Convenant and Tabernacle review belongs to the destruction of life?
originally posted by: GetHyped
originally posted by: beenharmed
Why has archaeology suddenly discovered ancient remnants that determine that the ancient practice of using nuclear dust in Ark of the Convenant and Tabernacle review belongs to the destruction of life?
Because it hasn't.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: beenharmed
Uhm, maybe you should continue this on your own thread. I see no connection with what everyone else is trying to discuss here.