It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
22.7 percent were victims of anti-White bias.
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Indigo5
"just a couple of weeks ago an exhaustive study of white vs. black offenders was done...identical crimes...blacks on average got 20% longer prison sentences.
Blacks more likely to be pulled over or interact with cops..
Blacks with the same credit scores more likely to be turned down for a home loan..
etc. etc. "
What factored into that study? Did the blacks have the same rap sheet as the white when pulled over? What were they doing to get pulled over? Were they calling about the home loans or were they appearing in person? What bank were they being turned down by? Were they trying to buy identical houses?
I'm not telling you that you're wrong, I'm just trying to find out what factored into this study. Saying things like this is why we can't move past the divide, in my opinion.
And anything titled "Dear White America" is hard to consider unbiased. Not to mention, George Yancy is a professor of philosophy at Emory University. He has written, edited and co-edited numerous books, including “Black Bodies, White Gazes,” “Look, a White!” and “Pursuing Trayvon Martin,” co-edited with Janine Jones.
I think his 19 interviews are lacking proper statistics and information. And skimming over his article, he doesn't seem too particular of any race other than his own.
I'm just going by facts, as presented by the links I posted.
If you read my post again, perhaps you'll understand that I said slaves in the New World were safer than slaves in the Caribbeans,
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Indigo5
What factored into that study? Did the blacks have the same rap sheet as the white when pulled over? What were they doing to get pulled over? Were they calling about the home loans or were they appearing in person? What bank were they being turned down by? Were they trying to buy identical houses?
I'm not telling you that you're wrong, I'm just trying to find out what factored into this study. Saying things like this is why we can't move past the divide, in my opinion.
I can google up the studies when time affords, I am at work now...but specifically the recent sentencing study was a large sample and really rigorous in comparing apples to apples. Same crimes and offense records (1st strike, 2nd strike) etc. African Americans got 20% longer sentences.
Is it your position that institutional racism does not exist?
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Gryphon66
EXACTLY! These days you don't know what is and isn't a legitimate hate crime.
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Gryphon66
You nailed it brother. I wish I knew the answer to your question, but I know I don't remember it being anything like this in the 90's.
Happy New Year!
originally posted by: Gryphon66
This letter reflects what Dr. George Yancy DOES for a living.
Here's his vita: George Yancy, Ph.D., Emory University, Department of Philosophy
His approach is pure rarified academia. He lives in the realm of subjective idealism. He sent us all a letter from that disconnected height.
That said, he has some valid points, if he would turn his insightful analysis on ALL people, not just "White America."
What would happen if we all just stop acting like idiots at once?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Gryphon66
EXACTLY! These days you don't know what is and isn't a legitimate hate crime.
I think we do, actually.
We know a real HATE crime when we see it. I think we can feel when someone has done something out of pure HATE for someone else ... and by HATE I mean that which is tending to and will become actual VIOLENCE left unchecked.
The phrase, like so many others, has become politicized now. It's part of the narrative ... it's used against the truth.
Some might even say that as a black male, who has already been stereotyped as a “crotch-grabbing, sexual fiend,” that I’m at risk of reinforcing that stereotype. (Let’s be real, that racist stereotype has been around for centuries; it is already part of white America’s imaginary landscape.)
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Gryphon66
EXACTLY! These days you don't know what is and isn't a legitimate hate crime.
I think we do, actually.
We know a real HATE crime when we see it. I think we can feel when someone has done something out of pure HATE for someone else ... and by HATE I mean that which is tending to and will become actual VIOLENCE left unchecked.
The phrase, like so many others, has become politicized now. It's part of the narrative ... it's used against the truth.
I agree. I'm talking about hate crimes that are reported in statistics. Actually, in my opinion, any crime is a hate crime.