It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
That is just morality wrong, Santa has a white beard. Isn't anything sacred anymore...
originally posted by: OhOkYeah
originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: OhOkYeah
Yes what the average male of christs time period & geographic location would probably have looked like.
So yes jesus more than likely looked similar to that depiction.
But sure just a waste of time since it doesn't fit your religulous fantasies of what christ looked like.
K~
Everyone knows he was middle eastern. But to pretend like they can map out the facial features of a person that might not have existed is absolutely haram.
originally posted by: aethertek
originally posted by: OhOkYeah
originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: OhOkYeah
Yes what the average male of christs time period & geographic location would probably have looked like.
So yes jesus more than likely looked similar to that depiction.
But sure just a waste of time since it doesn't fit your religulous fantasies of what christ looked like.
K~
Everyone knows he was middle eastern. But to pretend like they can map out the facial features of a person that might not have existed is absolutely haram.
Wow seriously? Good god man they didn't claim it was the visage of christ himself but that of a man from his time & place.
Really I can't tell if you have comprehension issues or pedantic troll issues.
What I find disgusting is not the idea of a "black jesus" but people who would take issue over such a thing.
K~
originally posted by: OhOkYeah
originally posted by: aethertek
originally posted by: OhOkYeah
originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: OhOkYeah
Yes what the average male of christs time period & geographic location would probably have looked like.
So yes jesus more than likely looked similar to that depiction.
But sure just a waste of time since it doesn't fit your religulous fantasies of what christ looked like.
K~
Everyone knows he was middle eastern. But to pretend like they can map out the facial features of a person that might not have existed is absolutely haram.
Wow seriously? Good god man they didn't claim it was the visage of christ himself but that of a man from his time & place.
Really I can't tell if you have comprehension issues or pedantic troll issues.
What I find disgusting is not the idea of a "black jesus" but people who would take issue over such a thing.
K~
So, you think some nerd with a computer beats out all of DaVinci's depictions of Jesus?
No
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: OhOkYeah
Leonardo da Vinci was a genius of his age, perhaps THE genius, but by the standards of today's knowledge, a layperson. Amongst today's most brilliant minds, his understanding would be like that of a child, a smart one, but a child none the less.
And as for his genius being capable of besting a nerd with a computer, at rendering an imagined image? Without doubt. At assembling a face based on pre-existing athropological data? No, not at all. Sorry.
It is pretty obvious that you have a problem with the concept being dealt with in this thread, because you are expressing some pretty deep seated misunderstandings about ethnicity and genetics, and how they most assuredly play into the life and times of Jesus Christ. These are flaws in thought, which one could not possibly make if the balance of ones mind was even and steady. Evidently something about the idea of Jesus not being a white skinned, light eyed fellow makes you deeply uneasy. There IS something wrong with taking such a position.
I would still love Jesus Christ, even if he was black, brown, olive skinned, an albino, of Chinese extraction, or from the other side of the damned Moon. The fellow was awesome, and continues to be awesome, regardless of your opinion of his ethnic and genetic background.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
Well at least they could have made it Aborigine with kinky blond hair..geez... it is Australia. Oh BTW we are talking about a town of 14,000 so we might be having this heavy debate over what 12 people there who think he should be white. Lol
originally posted by: cuckooold
originally posted by: Xtrozero
Well at least they could have made it Aborigine with kinky blond hair..geez... it is Australia. Oh BTW we are talking about a town of 14,000 so we might be having this heavy debate over what 12 people there who think he should be white. Lol
FYI, this story is from Melbourne, a city of over 4.4 million, and very multicultural to boot.
originally posted by: THEatsking
originally posted by: OhOkYeah
This is disgusting
The son of GOD is absolutely NOT black
Hopefully you're just trolling, because otherwise you're simply a # racist.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: OhOkYeah
I would still love Jesus Christ, even if he was black, brown, olive skinned, an albino, of Chinese extraction, or from the other side of the damned Moon. The fellow was awesome, and continues to be awesome, regardless of your opinion of his ethnic and genetic background.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: THEatsking
originally posted by: OhOkYeah
This is disgusting
The son of GOD is absolutely NOT black
Hopefully you're just trolling, because otherwise you're simply a # racist.
Is Jesus of African descent or not? I'm not sure you can call Middle Eastern countries African descent...