Donald Trump Solidifies His Lead, but Leaves Many Nervous

Any Presidential candidate that wants to flood our country with illegals should automatically disqualified from running for office. We all know that the only reason the Kenyan Communist is doing that is to rig the elections in Democrats favor.

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

I'll agree he's better than hillary. Is the answer? I wouldn't say so, but I will say that if a democrat wins, I'd rather it be him since Jim Webb was all but thrown out. I think he was the answer. Dude was an old Reagan democrat. But what about Bernie's health? He'll be 75 when the election rolls around. I can remember people saying McCain was too old, and he was 72. The oldest president elected was Reagan at age 69. I'm not trying to sound like I'm moving from one thing to another, but it is definitely something to consider.

a reply to: Enochstask

Yet when Commie Sanders tells the mother of all lies that ISIS is fueled by global warming you lap that nonsense up.

Source it, please.

And then separate 'fossil fuel' economics and military/industrial interests from 'green energy.'
Explain your answer.


Oh - because "oil" is the issue????? That's RIGHT!!!

a reply to: Enochstask

whatever.

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

I'm going by what he said, and what Merriam-Webster defined. So there are your "idiotic lies" I'm lapping up.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: LSU0408

SANDERS: Well, we’re gonna win because first, we’re gonna explain what democratic socialism is.

see, LSU, at that point you have to start paying attention, if not taking notes....

And what democratic socialism is about is saying that it is immoral and wrong that the top one-tenth of 1 percent in this country own almost 90 percent — almost — own almost as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent. That it is wrong, today, in a rigged economy, that 57 percent of all new income is going to the top 1 percent...

etc.

And your problem with this is....what, again?

And you're 'paraphrasing' whom, again?



And WHAT is wrong or objectionable about that quote (that YOU posted)? I only posted half of it...if that.

You tell me, what is WRONG with what he said - that stuff you just posted......

please.

So why don't you ever fuss about the obscene salaries the Hollywood folks make? I mean if you make a movie for a 20
million dollars that should last you the rest of your life. You step away from the movie industry and let others who want to be in film have a chance. Let's SOCIALIZE the film industry first then we will talk about industry.

a reply to: LSU0408

I'm going by what he said,

SOURCE IT, please.
IN CONTEXT.

a reply to: Enochstask

The film industry is already socialized.....they have unions.

a reply to: Enochstask

Yep, that's the kind of shart that leads to revolts...

a reply to: LSU0408

A small agreement, but not exactly a high bar. Literally anyone is better than Hillary. I don't what it is, but there is something seriously wrong with her. I would put Dubya in for another sixteen years in her place. I'm not sure if this is even the sort of thing I should say, but I would have to weigh in on possibly replacing her with Hitler. That's the level of bad vibes I'm getting. It's ridiculous. Sickening.

Age might be a consideration, but should you really pass up a chance at one of the potentially best presidents the US has ever had, because they might die of old age during that presidency? I'd be more worried about sniper bullets than old age, for Bernie's sake, anyway.
He seems quite healthy, it's not like he's wheezing on a deathbed. Admittedly, President is a massively stressful job so that could change (look at Obama, though I'm sure everyone's attitude towards him wouldn't help), but I think Bernie has the gumption for it.

originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: LSU0408

I think he will do everything he can to change that. Will he succeed? Honestly, I think I believe in him. He might get JFK'd though.

I don't think you'll disagree that his efforts to get corruption and money out of politics is bad thing. Right? Hell, I'd probably support Trump (though a lot less than Sanders) if that was his goal and I believed he meant it. That's the start of change. It has to come first.

Nobody hates Bernie enough to kill him, so I doubt he'd get JFK'd. He'd fall down some stairs before that happened.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Enochstask

Yet when Commie Sanders tells the mother of all lies that ISIS is fueled by global warming you lap that nonsense up.

Source it, please.

And then separate 'fossil fuel' economics and military/industrial interests from 'green energy.'
Explain your answer.


Oh - because "oil" is the issue????? That's RIGHT!!!

Here is a link where he doubled down on it.

thehill.com...

a reply to: Enochstask

But, NFL players are paid equivalently, and the NFL itself is a "nonprofit" organization?


I have to bow out now - you guys are getting so far off in the distance that I can't hear your irrelevancies anymore.

SOURCES. Provide SOURCES. Both you and LSU - show us where Bernie said these things......
until you do - you are dismissed.


ETA:

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Sunday reiterated his claim that climate change will lead to terrorism by destabilizing regions affected by droughts, floods, and other natural disasters.



“The reason is pretty obvious: If we are going to see an increase in drought and flood and extreme weather disturbances as a result of climate change, what that means is that peoples all over the world are going to be fighting over limited natural resources,” Sanders said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”
“If there is not enough water, if there is not enough land to grow your crops, then you’re going to see migrants of people fighting over land that will sustain them, and that will lead to international conflict,” he added.

Ah. Well done.
Yes - if people are starving or drowning or being killed in severe storms, they are going to be upset.
Due to limited natural resources, only the 'wealthy' will have access to things like 'water', 'food', etc......if we keep going.

Fine. I see nothing objectionable, false, or misleading about that. Do you?

What would you do if your water was shut off, your grocer's shut down, your house was sinking......
and you had no tools or ideas about how to hunt, fish, etc - and even if you did, there's nowhere to go hunt and fish and collect water?

What would you do?

Oh - right. Assault weapons. Yeah. Smart.

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

I don't see an issue with blocking unknown foreigners from entering the U/S at the heightened level of alert we're at. Definitely don't mind putting up a wall and getting South Americans here legally. That's about the level Trump is at. He's surely not a Hitler, or KKK, or phobic like he's labeled. He's just looking out for the best of America's interest. IMO.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Enochstask

But, NFL players are paid equivalently, and the NFL itself is a "nonprofit" organization?


I have to bow out now - you guys are getting so far off in the distance that I can't hear your irrelevancies anymore.

SOURCES. Provide SOURCES. Both you and LSU - show us where Bernie said these things......
until you do - you are dismissed.

I don't think the NFL should be a nonprofit organization. I also heard they lost that status.

a reply to: LSU0408

I personally don't believe JFK was killed because he was hated. Not by Oswald at least, but that might be too tinfoil for you.

I wouldn't be so sure though, I mean, look at Enoch. If you assume he's maybe in the top 10% of people who hate Bernie, how do you think the top 1% would act?

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Enochstask

The film industry is already socialized.....they have unions.

Not everyone can join the union at will. The unions in Hollywood are like elite socialist country clubs where only the right people *wink *wink can get in, if you know what I mean.

a reply to: Enochstask

Not true.
I'm done with you.

originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: LSU0408

I personally don't believe JFK was killed because he was hated. Not by Oswald at least, but that might be too tinfoil for you.

I wouldn't be so sure though, I mean, look at Enoch. If you assume he's maybe in the top 10% of people who hate Bernie, how do you think the top 1% would act?

There you go sticking words in my mouth again. I don't hate Commie Sanders but I sure as hell don't want another socialist/communist experiment in our country.

a reply to: LSU0408

I feel like the rhetoric people use to describe Trump gets overblown because the man himself tends towards using overblown rhetoric. I have personally used the Hitler comparison, because I think there is some basis there. It's not Trump himself I worry about, it's his frothingly insane followers (those among his followers that are frothingly insane, not that all his followers are frothingly insane) and the sort of attitude he promotes.

As I said earlier, he might be looking out for America's interest... But isn't Putin looking out for Russia's? "America" =/= "America's Citizens." You have to keep that in mind.