Donald Trump Solidifies His Lead, but Leaves Many Nervous

a reply to: Enochstask

Maybe I am too used to people repeatedly using Obama's name to give something a negative meaning. Clarify what you meant then, if you would, because you most definitely seemed to be implying it from my perspective.

a reply to: LSU0408

Doesn't matter. You tried to extrapolate the personal to the political and in doing so showed hypocrisy in your political choice.

a reply to: Enochstask

I guess people as usual have short time memories, but then again when Hillary was nothing but a mere low lever lawyer before many of the new generation were born she already was showing the signs of what she truly is.

Hillary Clinton fired for lies, unethical behavior The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week.[b[ “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

I guess even then she loved to give away secrets.

And she is the best Democrats have? considering that she is one of the "poster politicians"?

At least Trump doesn't hide his true nature.

www.westernjournalism.com...

a reply to: marg6043

Actually, the best the Democrats have is Sanders, who is almost incomprehensibly better than every other option. He's more of an independent at heart, though.

a reply to: LSU0408

I understand that, but how many people would do what he did if they had a million dollars?

You have no clue how he was raised; how his father/mother approached the whole thing; maybe his creditor (father) was a helicopter parent who had to "approve" every move he made. Maybe Donald was, as a child, intimidated by his rich folks, and didn't dare go out of bounds......

maybe there was some deep, dark, secret that the fam covered up together........



Being "lent" $1 million is a bit different from 'winning the lottery.' You think he wasn't operating under expectations????

lol

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

Actually, the best the Democrats have is Sanders, who is almost incomprehensibly better than every other option. He's more of an independent at heart, though.

He's the best that ANYONE has......

Dems, Reps, Indies, Unaffiliateds.....
he's the ONLY viable candidate.

We just have to wait til all the hubbub dies down.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

Actually, the best the Democrats have is Sanders, who is almost incomprehensibly better than every other option. He's more of an independent at heart, though.

He's the best that ANYONE has......

Dems, Reps, Indies, Unaffiliateds.....
he's the ONLY viable candidate.

We just have to wait til all the hubbub dies down.

So the old dirty diaper wearing Commie Sanders the one who said "ISIS is on a killing spree because of global warming" is the best candidate? Ahh hahahaha...Ahh hahahaha

a reply to: Enochstask

the old dirty diaper wearing Commie Sanders

Wow. Did you just make that up with your extraordinary powers of language?

Impressive.

And if not, who first told you about these alleged traits of his and suggested the adjectives you've employed deployed in your post????

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: LSU0408

Doesn't matter. You tried to extrapolate the personal to the political and in doing so showed hypocrisy in your political choice.

No, Intro, I asked you a simple question. Would you trust someone that is going to lie to you. It had nothing to do with Someone lying to their spouse, that was in reference to whether or not you would trust your significant other if you knew they would lie to you. There was no extrapolating on my behalf.

a reply to: marg6043

I also recall a recording where she gave herself a pat on the back for getting a man off of sexual abuse charges after he molested and raped a young girl. I recall her chuckling about it. She's as crummy as a state funded defense lawyer.

a reply to: Enochstask

I was going to respond properly, but ended up deciding otherwise. You aren't worth the time that would take. I'll just mention that you're an idiot and move along.

Re: Trump.

It's incredibly easy to make money if you already have a lot of money. That's how the system is geared to work. The rich get richer.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Enochstask

the old dirty diaper wearing Commie Sanders

Wow. Did you just make that up with your extraordinary powers of language?

Impressive.

And if not, who first told you about these alleged traits of his and suggested the adjectives you've employed deployed in your post????

So you think Commie Sanders is right that ISIS is killing folks because of global warming?

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn


Yes he is, I have to agree with you, even if I have a problem with Sanders, he will be a lame president as is well know to be a preacher at hart, even if that attracts the religious right, I don't want a preacher for president, a rich preacher but nerveless.

Still, Hillary is the favorite within the party.

originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: marg6043

Actually, the best the Democrats have is Sanders, who is almost incomprehensibly better than every other option. He's more of an independent at heart, though.

He's an admitted socialist. You serious?

a reply to: LSU0408

Yes I have read about that but it was not as bad as been call a liar and dishonest, if you look at the lawyers from the San Bernardino terrorist killers, in the site it said that they can get over 90% of people from DUI charges, so lawyers do what they need to do.

a reply to: LSU0408

While we disagree on who the best candidate is, Hillary is probably one of the worst. Seriously, bad vibes.

Plus, she's just so bland. Sanders will make America awesome, Cruz or Carson would get it laughed off the world stage, and Count Trumpula will make everything burn (or alternatively make everything awesome. He's pretty nuts, but sometimes I wonder if he'd manage to surprise everyone and do a great job.) Hillary is just... Establishment everything. Bleech, as bad as Jeb, if not worse.

a reply to: Enochstask

Dude, I don't even know what to say. Do you name call in every single post? It's always some prepubescent version of someone's name (you've got multiple ones for Obama, Hillary, & Bernie). Come here with some intelligence, please. What you are doing is not debating, it's not even arguing, it's just petty nonsense. There are actual ways to make a point. Try substance, and facts. The name calling just makes it look like you've got nothing, and perhaps that's what it boils down to.

a reply to: LSU0408

He is a socialist as long as his own personal wealth is not involved too.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: LSU0408

I understand that, but how many people would do what he did if they had a million dollars?

You have no clue how he was raised; how his father/mother approached the whole thing; maybe his creditor (father) was a helicopter parent who had to "approve" every move he made. Maybe Donald was, as a child, intimidated by his rich folks, and didn't dare go out of bounds......

maybe there was some deep, dark, secret that the fam covered up together........



Being "lent" $1 million is a bit different from 'winning the lottery.' You think he wasn't operating under expectations????

lol

Yeah, I'm not sure if you were trying to agree with me or not, but that's my whole point that he knows how to manage money and very smart financially.

a reply to: LSU0408

Please, tell me, have you actually researched him and his campaign in-depth, yourself?

If you haven't, please do yourself a massive favor and look into it. The "Socialist" accusation has been used a fear tactic for an extremely long time. Yes, pure socialism is terrible (though pure capitalism is just as bad), but that's not what Sanders actually is.

He's not even anti-gun, which is great for you guys (probably.)