It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: beenharmed
Can you please explain "the natural fusion of stone". Let me get my popcorn first.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: the2ofusr1
Maybe you misunderstood the purpose of my questions. You say he is trusted by many that is all fine and good, but I don't trust people just because others do I would trust him if I had a good reason. Credentials like degrees projects he worked on in the climatology field and such.
Ya know...you can always look at the data for yourself...nothing quite like actually "knowing"
I think that there are some people and institutions that used Michael Mann's hockey stick graph .Does that make those that have, questionable or loose confidence in ? Corbett's reporting always had links to the sources he uses . Like him , many are very skeptical of what the pro-AGW crowed have been saying . For me the model projections and the divergence away from tracking both CO2 and temperatures is the real elephant . I think it's up to 50 or more reasons for this ,but they contradict what they also say . Its the missing heat that is the big question mark that the models can not make cognitive .
he used a known debunked graph which doesn't give me any confidence in him.