California Begins Injecting Children with Mercury...

This is the wrong way.

originally posted by: vjr1113
a reply to: Gothmog

do you think the medical industry should be making less money? im sure that's good for any nation, right? a weak health care system.

why dont you whine about the fat cats on wall street and leave the doctors alone, after all, who else will cure the sick?

WELL DOCTORS ARE POISONING US

prove it

I think I just did. Do you know of any other product you ingest that the FDA would allow an additive under strict regulation ? I dont.

a reply to: Gothmog

if they wanted to kill us they wouldn't regulate it.

believe what you want.

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: ~Lucidity
It sure seems like they are pushing it hard this year. My doctor went nuts when I told her I wasn't going to take the flu shot. I was actually surprised how insistent she was being about it because she is normally pretty laid back.

That's because she's probably out a hefty financial bounty for failing to poison a patient.

a reply to: Metallicus

Just wait another year. They'll probably make it mandatory if you want a cell phone next.

a reply to: Metallicus

wow man..!!

I thought this would turn out to be a pariody of sorts...

until I saw the pic~!!!! OMG~!!

a reply to: Metallicus

This is really sad... More so because we are talking about children. It's as if they want children to get neurological and even genetic disorders...

a reply to: Metallicus

I've never had a flu shot and I am older than I look!

Either we are just plain unlucky in the causation of naturally occuring, mega-virolent strains of flu OR...

They are purposefully being introduced to us.

Know any government rabid enough to purposefully inject harm to their citizens?

California is a product of their government's practices.

originally posted by: Metallicus

I am NOT anti-vax.

good luck with that...I live in California, and ANY time I try an have an intelligent conversation about parental choice, even choosing vaccines but delaying and breaking them up into smaller more spread out doses the opposition can only stand there and shout "ANTI VAXER!"
I've had friends that I have known for years yell at me to my face and call a children killing anti-vaxer

a reply to: Metallicus

As much I would like to say this is just a [temporary] stop gap for a 'limited' supply, and the "availability" of this particular product [with thimerosal], why, when, how, and by whom the code was temporarily suspended, plus an option to wait until after 31 DEC would be articulated to patients, and any concerns addressed by practitioners...

My gut says they [the state] have expiring stocks and don't want to loose their investment in the old stuff.

"Push the fish, it is about to turn."

OMG, fail, rotfl. Met, NN isn't credible. Even the hippy dippy crunchtastic Mothering rag has more credibility there, and they're AIDS denialists.

It is more likely that all the collective Mars Rocks threads are proof of alien life than NN being honest & not full of it.

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: ~Lucidity

It sure seems like they are pushing it hard this year. My doctor went nuts when I told her I wasn't going to take the flu shot. I was actually surprised how insistent she was being about it because she is normally pretty laid back.

They have been educated in a very hard manner lately that everyone who does not blindly believe everything they say is a misinformed internet quack, who believes the doctor is a bought and paid for shill.

So many doctors have been pushed to the brink, even the good ones are now snapping at the demands of both sides, all the while being forced to handle more patients for less money.

Almost seems like something is trying to break every system on the planet.....

originally posted by: Bluntone22
Just out of curiosity, does this dose of mercury pose any more danger than eating tuna once a week?

Just out of curiosity, does injecting something directly into your bloodstream and cells pose any more danger than eating something ??

a reply to: ParasuvO

Just out of curiosity, does injecting something directly into your bloodstream

Most vaccines are not injected directly into the bloodstream.

a reply to: projectvxn

Explain. All the vaccines I recall required a needle to the arm, and I don't think they were going into muscle or subcutaneous, rather looking and plugging into a vein.

Vaccines

Hrmm, guess I'm incorrect. Looks like most are shots to the muscle. Been a long time since I took one.

It's still a hell of a lot worse than taking in the equivalent dose through the digestive system.

a reply to: ringdingdong

It's still a hell of a lot worse than taking in the equivalent dose through the digestive system.

No it isn't.

Muscle injection allows the vaccine to be absorbed slowly into the system.

There are exceptions. The modern flu vaccines given to US Army personnel are nasal aerosols.

Vaccines MUST be introduced into the system slowly. The whole point is to elicit an immune system response.

a reply to: ringdingdong

And not even that.

The flu shot is sub-Q meaning it doesn't even go into your muscle, just into your subcutaneous fat layers. That's why they can give it nasally or with the air injectors now.

a reply to: Metallicus

im in cali and definitely have a choice, i think you need look over your statement

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

This stuff is sounding like the Docs have been brainwashed to administer the stuff, check out what has happened in W.A. they have stopped giving the stuff, where in California its a crime not to. Its sounding like the Big Pharma. have bought the governments souls with lobbyists. www.watoday.com.au...#ixzz3svFu5WT3 what a flaming web page nightmare.

originally posted by: ketsuko
California is the land of measles, remember?

They are not pushing flu vaccines where I'm at any more than normal, so if they are doing it in California, I'm betting the measles outbreak is a factor.

Measles and flu are TWO DIFFERENT DISEASES. There is no comparison to be made...