It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 0bserver1
It seems that Russia has fought many battles against Turkey and Turkey lost quite a lot. Now it looks as they know that NATO is backing Turkey , they want to start another war with Russia .
It will leave NATO divided if this is going to happen IMO ..
originally posted by: 0bserver1
It seems that Russia has fought many battles against Turkey and Turkey lost quite a lot. Now it looks as they know that NATO is backing Turkey , they want to start another war with Russia .
It will leave NATO divided if this is going to happen IMO ..
originally posted by: voyger2
just a little memory exercise, from 30 october 2013.
The Daily Telegraph has learned:
”Every day there are Mujahideen coming here from all different nationalities,” said Abu Abdulrahman, a Jordanian volunteer managing the flow of foreign fighters. He handles a network of receiving centres in southern Turkey for volunteers wishing to join al-Qaeda’s branch in Syria, known as “the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant” (ISIL).
The Daily Telegraph
originally posted by: arcnaver
I would totally trust RT news, especially when concerning questionable Russian political and UFO incidents. They'll never steer you wrong!
I'm nearly positive Russia did violate Turkish airspace. I'm also certain Turkey was being a bunch of idiots when they shot down their aircraft.
Neither the Russian's nor the Turks are innocent in this. They're both doing things they shouldn't be doing.
originally posted by: Savvyrascal
a reply to: Aliensun
I may be wrong, and also others might have already said this.... But isn't the reason behind NATO to back up the other member countries? What I mean is - if a country is seen to be wronging a member of NATO.... The rest of the 'Gang' can be called for help!?
If Turkey (being a part of NATO) calls foul about Russia 'picking' on them, and "Magically" produces evidence (doesn't require truth, just needs to be believable), then Nato can either tell any such Aggressor to back down or face sanctions, and or war. Anyone in Nato with an axe to grind against Russia, ya think? Apologies if that doesn't make as much sense as I though...