Swedish village at war with migrants housed in emergency center.

www.dailymail.co.uk... n-aged-five-need-POLICE-ESCORT-school.html

Well this is just crazy. It states that tensions are so bad that police are having to escort children to school. Swedes are spitting on these kids, what the hell? I was under the impression that this part of the world was pretty tolerant.

You never know with the Daily Mail, however the part about protesters setting fire to 17 immigration centers in the past 60 days I would think would easy to verify.

The problems are said to have begun in September when migrants started throwing stones at locals' cars, and residents retaliated by throwing them back.
The fires were further stoked on social media - and eventually locals, thought to be teenagers, began organising 'events' where a gang would gather to throw stones at the block of flats which has been turned into a makeshift migrant centre.
Mr Petterson said: 'This went on for about two weeks at a low scale, almost every day. It escalated windows at the centre were smashed.
'This scared the migrants. They had come from Syria - from a war zone - to this.'
The following day a car belonging to a refugee family was set on fire.

Can some members elaborate on what is causing the tension besides racism? I did see in the article a local "councillor" gripes that they pay the highest tax rate in the area which he blames on the refugees.

Very sad situation, people shouldn't be spitting on children...

I guess people don't like having potential terrorists imported into their neighborhoods? Maybe the idiot politicians should have asked their constituency what they wanted. You know...those people that voted for them that they are supposed to be representing?

a reply to: SergeantSmoke

Well. That is what you get.

I live in Denmark, and honestly, we have an interview with a muslim living in a refugee camp.

www.bt.dk...

Don't worry. They speak english. NOTE: The guy to the left stands in a t-shirt, albeit the guy talking says it's cold.
They also state "They thought Denmark was a rich country."
They aren't coming because of peace, but to get welfare. Period.


This also happens in the rest of Europe, and everyone is sick of it.

Once again, the muslims started it and then act surprised when people actually fight back.

"The problems are said to have begun..."

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
Once again, the muslims started it and then act surprised when people actually fight back.

"The problems are said to have begun..."

This is so true.

Muslims keep doing #, when it backfires they use the racism card. I haven't as of yet, met a single muslim who could argue for their cause, without either begin to threaten, or begin to throw with mud. Savages.

a reply to: SBargisen

People are angry and since the politicians are hiding in a mansion somewhere people are targeting the foreign invaders instead.

It's human nature to fight back.

Scumbags spit at people...
Scumbag Cowards spit on children...

a reply to: Metallicus

They, the immigrants, are not terrorists and not even potential terrorists.
The immigrants fleef the terrorists because they want a normal life.
What we see here is the divide an conquer strategy working itself out.
Our governments want us all to fight the immigrants ... or be devided over them.
Can't you see?
Above article is pure propaganda.

a reply to: SergeantSmoke

Maybe this?

Sweden: Rape Capital of the West

In 1975, the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the former homogeneous Sweden into a multicultural country. Forty years later the dramatic consequences of this experiment emerge: violent crime has increased by 300%.

If one looks at the number of rapes, however, the increase is even worse. In 1975, 421 rapes were reported to the police; in 2014, it was 6,620. That is an increase of 1,472%.




www.americanthinker.com...

One out of every four Swedish women being the victim of rape.

With Muslims represented in as many as 77 percent of the rape cases and a major increase in rape cases paralleling a major increase in Muslim immigration, the wages of Muslim immigration are proving to be a sexual assault epidemic by a misogynistic ideology.

The escalation of rape in Sweden is so bad that in July of last year there were an average of five rapes a day reported in Stockholm. Think about that for a minute; five women being raped a day in a modern civilized city. This isn't Afghanistan or Mexico we're talking about; it's Sweden.

The fact that the quantity of rapes is increasing due to the increase of Muslim immigrants is in itself disturbing. As of 2008, Sweden's rape statistics were up to 53.2 per 100,000 population. Sadly, they are most likely higher as the Muslim population continues to grow without any willingness to assimilate into Swedish society.

The only way to fix such a problem is either halt immigration altogether, or to bring down the law on Muslim immigrants who are unwilling to obey. However, such actions force Swedish officials to recognize the root of the problem - Islam. And we all know how government officials react to that.

originally posted by: Daalder
a reply to: Metallicus

They, the immigrants, are not terrorists and not even potential terrorists.
The immigrants fleef the terrorists because they want a normal life.
What we see here is the divide an conquer strategy working itself out.
Our governments want us all to fight the immigrants ... or be devided over them.
Can't you see?
Above article is pure propaganda.

The immigrants with 70-80 % men, aren't potential terrorists??? Get out of here.

a reply to: infolurker

You just hit the nail right on the head. Well done.

a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Spitting is rude, but if it makes them scumbags what do you call someone that murders a hundred innocent people with an AK-47? I prefer the scumbag.

a reply to: Metallicus

I perfer the scumbag too, and in my world zero Islamic terrorists are acceptable. Having said that, we don't spit on children no matter how angry we are if I got a problem I take it to the problem and to someone who can fight back, not a child or a woman.

a reply to: Metallicus

Gotta be one or the other has it?

Please.

originally posted by: SergeantSmoke
Can some members elaborate on what is causing the tension besides racism?

Not "race" its culture.

Two incompatible cultures being forced to live together. The end result will always be both sides acting badly.

a reply to: Metallicus

I guess people don't like having potential terrorists imported into their neighborhoods?

For real man? Islamic extremists make up such a small percentage(depending on the statistics you look at)of the Muslim community(which is close to 2 billion,extremists make anywhere from 14% to 0.0006% in other Muslim countries) and most of the Islamic terrorists are homegrown in europe.

Yet you brand all Muslim migrants as potential terrorists...

a reply to: Metallicus

Not to mention who does the most crime, who is the biggest scumbags etc.

We have Ghetto's in Denmark where the police barely dare go to. Guess what kind of people dominate these ghetto's? Yup. Muslims.

They even throw rocks at firemen, assault paramedics, threaten the police. They don't care, worst scenario for them is to get inside a comfy prison.

What we need is laws AGAINST these kind of people, it would be racism, but clearly muslims need to be held in a short leash. Most atleast.


(God I sound super racist....)

a reply to: NateTheAnimator

Actually Islamic extremists are fairly wide spread, jihadists are smaller in numbers.

link

According to an ICM Research poll in 2006, 20% of British Muslims felt sympathy with the July 7 terrorist bombers' "feelings and motives", although 99 per cent thought the bombers were wrong to carry out the atrocity.[24] In another poll by NOP Research, almost one in four British Muslims believe that the 7/7 attacks on London were justified.[25]
In a Pew Research study from 2006, at least 1 in 4 respondents in the Muslim nations surveyed, except Turkey, had at least some confidence in Bin Laden. Confidence in Bin Laden was 16% or less among Muslims in the four European nations surveyed.
[26] In a 2007 Pew Research poll in response to a question on whether suicide bombing and other forms of violence against civilian targets to defend Islam could be justified,[27] in Europe: (36 vs 64) 64% of Muslims in France believed it could never be justified, 19% believed it could be justified rarely, 10% sometimes, and 6% thought it could be justified often. (30 vs 70) 70% of Muslims in Britain believed it could never be justified, 9% believed it could be justified rarely, 12% sometimes, and 3% thought it could be justified often. (17 vs 83) 83% of Muslims in Germany believed it could never be justified, 6% believed it could be justified rarely, 6% sometimes, and 1% thought it could be justified often. (31 vs 69) 69% of Muslims in Spain believed it could never be justified, 9% believed it could be justified rarely, 10% sometimes, and 6% thought it could be justified often. In mainly Muslim countries: (55 vs 45) 45% of Muslims in Egypt believed it could never be justified, 25% believed it could be justified rarely, 20% sometimes, and 8% thought it could be justified often. (39 vs 61) 61% of Muslims in Turkey believed it could never be justified, 9% believed it could be justified rarely, 14% sometimes, and 3% thought it could be justified often. (57 vs 43) 43% of Muslims in Jordan believed it could never be justified, 28% believed it could be justified rarely, 24% sometimes, and 5% thought it could be justified often. (72 vs 28) 28% of Muslims in Nigeria believed it could never be justified, 23% believed it could be justified rarely, 38% sometimes, and 8% thought it could be justified often. (31 vs 69) 69% of Muslims in Pakistan believed it could never be justified, 8% believed it could be justified rarely, 7% sometimes, and 7% thought it could be justified often. (29 vs 71) 71% of Muslims in Indonesia believed it could never be justified, 18% believed it could be justified rarely, 8% sometimes, and 2% thought it could be justified often.
John Esposito, using poll data from Gallup, wrote in 2008 that Muslims and Americans were equally likely to reject violence against civilians. He also found that those Muslims who support violence against civilians are no more religious than Muslims who do not.[28] ]

a reply to: SBargisen

What we need is laws AGAINST these kind of people, it would be racism, but clearly muslims need to be held in a short leash. Most atleast.

Does this apply to just Arab Muslims or does this "proposal" of yours apply to all Muslims regardless of nationality,race and ethnicity?

Just asking for some clarification on your part.

I could imagine people being sick of stuff like this:

When the terrorist attack happened in Paris, the news on the social media was flooded with it, ofcourse. Muslims didn't write "Pray for Paris." But more like; "Oh, so what about the other places where bombs fell?" "Why is this more important?"
The worst part in this is, that when confronted with this, the muslims would go to counter attack and write stuff like "I hope this country get hit next time" and "When you throw bombs at muslims you better be prepared to be bombed!"
They even sympathized with terrorist, and some ven hoped for this country to be bombed.

Why would anyone want to have these kind of people in their country?