It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
from noted source.
-- the warmest October ever observed (in 136 years of NOAA records),
7 out of 10 of the warmest months have occurred in 2015.
www.ncdc.noaa.gov...
The year-to-date temperature across global land and ocean surfaces was 1.55°F (0.86°C) above the 20th century average. This was the highest for January–October in the 1880–2015 record, surpassing the previous record set in 2014 by 0.22°F (0.12°C). Eight of the first ten months in 2015 have been record warm for their respective months.
I know, right. And oil is so damned cheap. Shame we can't burn more of it than we do.
I feel it and my wallet is heavier due to it. I can;t remember any year where I haven't turned on the furnace by now.
originally posted by: mc_squared
a reply to: reldra
It's really hard to convey the significance of this to people who are confused yet convinced that Al Gore and them commie scientists said "we're all supposed to be underwater by now".
But since you mentioned your furnace - to those people who really don't think 1 degree is a big deal - I always like to point out: think about how much energy is required to heat your house an extra degree (Celsius). Now think about how much energy it would take to make the whole planet do that.
Higher than ever recorded. Yes. It is a peak...in a trend.
Its an El Nino year and temperature is rising!!!!!
Correct.
the earth has not been warming for thousands of years
Not as consistantly or rapidly as they have been lately.
glaciers haven't been melting for thousands of years
Who said that. The thing is, when combined with the trend in temperatures. It says something to those with half a brain and bother to take the time to understand the physics.
sea levels have not fluctuated for thousands of years.
No. The Earth will do just fine, it's us humans who are going to have the problems. But paying less developed countries money won't really accomplish much of anything as far as global warming goes.
The earth is doomed unless we all agree to pay 100 billion dollars per year, every year starting in 2020 to less developed countries.
No. Not so much heat stroke and not so much drowning. But those 3.5mm add up and the rate is increasing. See, sea water and drinking water don't get along too well. Sea water and agriculture don't get along too well.
thereby saving us all from death by heat stroke or drowning from sea levels rising every year by 3.5 mm.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: reldra
If it is so warm then we won't have to burn fuel to heat our homes which means less greenhouse gases which means this pattern will end up correcting itself! Problem solved!
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
a reply to: reldra
Its an El Nino year and temperature is rising!!!!!
Well thats it, I am convinced.
We are not in an interglacial period, the earth has not been warming for thousands of years, glaciers haven't been melting for thousands of years and sea levels have not fluctuated for thousands of years. The only significant years are the last hundred years (or 30) and the only crime in anthopegenic activities.
The earth is doomed unless we all agree to pay 100 billion dollars per year, every year starting in 2020 to less developed countries.
The earth and the sun will surely take note of our generosity and start cooling immediately, thereby saving us all from death by heat stroke or drowning from sea levels rising every year by 3.5 mm.
Yes, Paris (sigh).
Tired of Control Freaks
Yeah. Oh wait, when did the industrial revolution start?
Its a trend - that developed over the last 180 years (kind of meaningless when put in context)
Trust? Not so much. Making the effort to understand the science instead of just saying "nope?" Yep.
Phage, you may trust the scientists and the scientists may or may not be correct (come on now, science has been wrong before and will be wrong again)
According to you there is no problem but...really?
The proposals on the table and currently in play, do nothing, absolutely freaking NOTHING, to address the problem.
originally posted by: mc_squared
a reply to: reldra
It's really hard to convey the significance of this to people who are confused yet convinced that Al Gore and them commie scientists said "we're all supposed to be underwater by now".
But since you mentioned your furnace - to those people who really don't think 1 degree is a big deal - I always like to point out: think about how much energy is required to heat your house an extra degree (Celsius). Now think about how much energy it would take to make the whole planet do that.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: reldra
This was the highest for January–October in the 1880–2015 record
Remind me... how old is the Earth and her climate ?
Right. But we are not talking about statistical analysis. We are talking about physics. Specifically the physics of radiative forcing and the effects of anthropogenic CO2 upon it. That is not an assumption.
1880 - 2015 is such a small range to use for statistical analysis in the grand scheme of things when we're talking billions of years of the climate changing naturally.
Yes. The thing is, what happened billions of years ago doesn't really have much to do with what's happening today. The Sun was cooler billions of years ago. The atmosphere was very different billions of years ago.
even a few hundred thousand years worth of data would be a tiny data set against billions of years