It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
I really don't care what you think. You fools have fought me at every turn, going so far as to call something written by one of the leading experts in the field, who helped write the DSM-5 you tout with such high regard, as "tabloid" material.
The treatment iirc was preparing the child to receive puberty blocking drugs at the first sign of puberty. This is beyond simple treatments that left the question of the future to the future, it was in specific preparation for changing sex, creating an expectation for the child to live up to which is in my opinion completely wrong.
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: Gryphon66
I wonder how many details can be hidden under the guise of an "employment decision".
I'm sure it was an employment decision to fire them.
originally posted by: Freija
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
I really don't care what you think. You fools have fought me at every turn, going so far as to call something written by one of the leading experts in the field, who helped write the DSM-5 you tout with such high regard, as "tabloid" material.
The treatment iirc was preparing the child to receive puberty blocking drugs at the first sign of puberty. This is beyond simple treatments that left the question of the future to the future, it was in specific preparation for changing sex, creating an expectation for the child to live up to which is in my opinion completely wrong.
Puberty blocking drugs are not specific preparation for changing sex. They are for delaying puberty and are fully reversible.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Annee
Yep. I quoted the good doctor above. The Torygraph article is old news from 2012 before the terminology was changed in 2013.
Razor is desperately trying to make the article fit their errant statements; that is my point.
originally posted by: Vector99
You do have a peer-reviewed pre-pubescent hormonal therapy study to include with this statement right?
A spokesman for Children's Lighthouse Learning Centers, which operates franchise locations in multiple states, said by phone Tuesday that he could not comment on matters related to employment. But when pressed by a reporter on whether Kirksey was terminated over her handling of a transgender student, the spokesman said no.
"What's unfortunate here is that a teacher who was fired from a school for a variety of issues decided to call a news station," said the spokesman, Jamie Izaks. "... This teacher had an agenda behind it and was very opportunistic with a recent vote and discussion in Houston."
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Psychiatric professionals disagree with your "take" on the facts, as has been pointed out.
Existing research indicates that children with GIDC grow out of gender dysphoria, do not grow up to be transgender, and most of them grow up to be homosexual
Existing research indicates that children with gender dysphoria grow out of gender dysphoria, do not grow up to be transgender, and most of them grow up to be homosexual
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Yep, they do. Shown repeatedly above. See DSM V for starters.
I'm not lying, I've been clear on every single thing I've said, and backed it up.
Second of all, for someone who is an authority (at least in their own mind) in matters psychological would hardly cite an article from a British tabloid as their only source.
You cited your own "authority," referenced a source that contradicted your claims, pretended that you can diagnose a child you've never met and know nothing about, stated that you are correct in using outdated terminology and suggested that the entire APA is wrong while you are right, etc. etc.
The fact that you're desperately trying to spin up something else is only demonstrating how far off base from any sort of standard medical references you were.
Trying to focus this on me isn't helping. You can admit you were wrong and that nothing you said applies to this case.
It's called Gender Identity Disorder of Childhood, and it's very rare for it to last, it almost always goes away. It's very common for them to become gay in adulthood (about 50% for boys and 75% for girls).
Existing research indicates that children with GIDC grow out of gender dysphoria, do not grow up to be transgender, and most of them grow up to be homosexual
I got the female to male mixed up like a few members did...
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
I appreciate you bringing facts to this discussion even if others are being obtuse. The only facts that matter to them are ones that support their agenda and if you don't agree with them they call you a bigot.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: deliberator
I got the female to male mixed up like a few members did...
Of course you did...this entire thing is unnecessarily confusing. Imagine how it seems to a 6 year old with two dads with an agenda.
A child assigned male at birth began confounding parents, family and neighbors at age 3 by repeatedly declaring and insisting, "I am a girl." After lengthy consultation with gender specialists, the child was eventually diagnosed with what once was called "gender-identity disorder of children" but is known in today's psychiatric manual, DSM-5, as "gender dysphoria in children." Now the child, 12 years old and approaching male puberty, is terrified about the prospect of impending body changes.
Gender dysphoria (GD) in children is a rare condition, and there has been thoughtful professional controversy about how to treat prepubescent children so diagnosed. However, there is little controversy among acknowledged experts about what to do for gender-dysphoric children when the onset of puberty, with its unwanted secondary sex characteristics, looms large.