It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
Then answer me this - how? How could they do it? Go on, tell me.
Question: “Do you have any people being paid by the CIA who are contributing to a major circulation — American journal?”
Answer: “We do have people who submit pieces to American journals.”
Question: “Do you have any people paid by the CIA who are working for television networks?”
Answer: “This I think gets into the kind of uh, getting into the details Mr. Chairman that I’d like to get into in executive session.”
(later)
Question: “Do you have any people being paid by the CIA who are contributing to the national news services — AP and UPI?”
Answer: “Well again, I think we’re getting into the kind of detail Mr. Chairman that I’d prefer to handle at executive session.”
originally posted by: awareness10
Consequently, doesn't what's his face.. white haired guy with talk show i forget his name.. cooper... He's a cia op i believe and i also recall cnn mentioning they have them operating within the news. It's not a secret.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
a reply to: DJTeej
Yes indeed and this journalist has confirmed it for sure.
Yes, and this journalist says that it's a load of total and utter honk.
It is well known by the core "journalists" that Fox News is a propaganda machine.. .and that's not leftist propaganda. I actually turned down a job with Murdoch's minions due to knowing they "manage" the news (and kick myself every once in a while when the bills aren't getting paid)... but most journalists know how important it all really is and are dedicated, cantankerous skeptics who dislike power and corruption... a whole lot.
On June 14, 2014, The New York Times published an opinion piece critical of embedded journalism during both the U.S. military occupation of Iraq and the war in Afghanistan. It was written by PVT Chelsea Manning, the former U.S. Army intelligence analyst now serving a 35-year prison sentence for leaking the largest set of classified documents in American history. At no point during his 2009–10 deployment in Iraq, Manning wrote, were there more than a dozen American journalists covering military operations—in a country of 31 million people and 117,000 U.S. troops. Manning charged that vetting of reporters by military public affairs officials was used "to screen out those judged likely to produce critical coverage," and that once embedded, journalists tended "to avoid controversial reporting that could raise red flags out of fear having their access terminated. " A result," wrote Manning, "is that the American public's access to the facts is gutted, which leaves them with no way to evaluate the conduct of American officials." Manning noted, "This program of limiting press access was challenged in court in 2013 by a freelance reporter, Wayne Anderson, who claimed to have followed his agreement but to have been terminated after publishing adverse reports about the conflict in Afghanistan. The ruling on his case upheld the military's position that there was no constitutionally protected right to be an embedded journalist."
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: Puppylove
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
a reply to: DJTeej
Yes indeed and this journalist has confirmed it for sure.
Yes, and this journalist says that it's a load of total and utter honk.
And he do we know that, you being a journalist, you aren't in on it and trying to preserve the status quot? Hmmmm.... quite the catch 22... >.>
I fear that a) you are being either a tad paranoid or a tad provocative and b) that once again the powers of the CIA are being overestimated. I have never been approached by a member of the CIA. If I had I would have laughed a lot at them. Besides, in on what? That would imply payment or some such reward. Sorry, but nope.
originally posted by: Puppylove
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: Puppylove
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
a reply to: DJTeej
Yes indeed and this journalist has confirmed it for sure.
Yes, and this journalist says that it's a load of total and utter honk.
And he do we know that, you being a journalist, you aren't in on it and trying to preserve the status quot? Hmmmm.... quite the catch 22... >.>
I fear that a) you are being either a tad paranoid or a tad provocative and b) that once again the powers of the CIA are being overestimated. I have never been approached by a member of the CIA. If I had I would have laughed a lot at them. Besides, in on what? That would imply payment or some such reward. Sorry, but nope.
Nope you don't need to be paid or anything. What you can and cannot put into paper gets approved or disapproved by those above you. Chances are either the stuff you write about is either irrelevant to anyone important, or you simply are unaware of some of the reasons your articles are disapproved. Also whether you are bribed personally or not, IF there's something going on you're still part of the industry, if it's undermined and people stop buying it and write you off, that's a threat to your very job and lively hood. Also if there are people in power, chances are even with this guy trying to rock the boat, chances are they'll still be in power and there's only bad and nothing good to come from you doing the same unless you want to be blacklisted by the very industry you're in.
Also what I said was mostly tongue in cheek, but your reasons why you couldn't be are rather silly and null in void by the very fact that if you were or weren't your actions would remain the same, so there really is no way for us to know. It really is a catch 22, cause if the paranoia people are having is true or not, someone like you would be here saying this either way.
Addendum: Hold up I just read that you report on... insurance... yeah seriously your article matter to anyone important I'm sure. Definitely need someone to babysit your articles alright. One way something like this would work is that they don't need to micromanage things and people that don't matter to the story they are trying to tell. If you aren't important you're not important, and insurance really? You're not important.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: redeyeblue
Government agencies from around the world have been exploiting the media for decades, anyone thinking otherwise must be walking around in a daze. It is no secret, that successive media outlets have been bought out to leave a handful, that control all TV networks and print. Any dim witted reporter can easily pick up on this, problem is all networks have slashed budgets or released reporters involved in investigative reporting. Any brave enough to get a story, never see it released for one reason or another. There is no free press anymore, it is authorized propaganda and people love it, it should be called celebrity juice.
Gosh, then that must make me particularly dim-witted, to have never caught of sniff of any such manipulation. Same with my father, who spent decades in the industry in London. Astonishing that they covered their tracks so well, whilst being obvious to some people who are able to spot the conspiracy!
Oh, wait...
Come off it people, all I'm seeing are wild claims and generic assumptions about the media. Bad assumptions by the way.
originally posted by: Baddogma
One time journalist here, too (and I write terribly enough to be one)... nobody told me what to write and nobody edited my work for content... only atrocious English.
It is well known by the core "journalists" that Fox News is a propaganda machine.. .and that's not leftist propaganda. I actually turned down a job with Murdoch's minions due to knowing they "manage" the news (and kick myself every once in a while when the bills aren't getting paid)... but most journalists know how important it all really is and are dedicated, cantankerous skeptics who dislike power and corruption... a whole lot.