It's time to wake up!

a reply to: daskakik

It's a simple question and why do you make a big deal out of this? Maybe because you don't know how?

originally posted by: Andy1144
It's a simple question and why do you make a big deal out of this?

Another loaded question.

ETA: Do you know what a loaded question is?

a reply to: daskakik

Every question is loaded based on you. Does it mean something that can have multiple answers?

a reply to: Andy1144

No.

It means that it is formulated from an unjustified assumption.

a reply to: daskakik

And why do have to wait for me to ask what it means? Can't you just say it?

originally posted by: Andy1144
And why do have to wait for me to ask what it means? Can't you just say it?

Why did you reply as if you knew what it meant?

a reply to: Andy1144

Isn't every question formulated from an assumption?

a reply to: daskakik

I edited to ask what it meant.

originally posted by: Andy1144
Isn't every question formulated from an assumption?

No, but I did leave out the word "unjustified" before assumption.

a reply to: Andy1144

That was on the second post not the first where you did not bring up the meaning of the term.

a reply to: daskakik

So the question, how can you know god doesn't exist if you can't prove he doesn't unjustified? How? It is a simple questions.

Explain more what is a loaded question and please give an example of a question which isn't loaded.

a reply to: Andy1144

The clasic example is "Do you still beat your wife?".

It assumes that you used to beat your wife.

How can we know god doesn't exist if we can't prove he doesn't?

Assumes that you can know and assumes that you can't prove that he does exist.

a reply to: daskakik

But you acknowledge god doesn't exist yet you know you can't prove he doesn't. Which means we can know god doesn't exist and also know we can't prove it, if the statement is correct.

a reply to: Andy1144

You're mixing up my personal words with the requirements of proof by the scientific community.

a reply to: daskakik

But we already know you don't need requirements from the community in order to know something for sure. All we experience, is this moment, is a conclusion which is fool proof, and true. It didn't require validation from science.

a reply to: Andy1144

Is the first example you gave in the previous post, not a loaded question? And the second about god was?

originally posted by: Andy1144
But we already know you don't need requirements from the community in order to know something for sure. All we experience, is this moment, is a conclusion which is fool proof, and true. It didn't require validation from science.

This doesn't make sense. Proof is pointless if it isn't proof to someone else.

Is the first example you gave in the previous post, not a loaded question? And the second about god was?

Both are loaded questions.

The first is a common example and the second is your question and the reasons why it is also a loaded question.

a reply to: daskakik

This doesn't make sense. Proof is pointless if it isn't proof to someone else.

Anyone can verify that all they experience, is this moment. It can be verified by anyone to be true, it isn't just true for me, it is true foe everyone.

Both are loaded questions.

Please give me an example of a question which isn't loaded.

I also say that god doesn't exist.

You made this claim earlier, but you say you can't prove it. How do you explain this contradiction?

originally posted by: Andy1144
Anyone can verify that all they experience, is this moment. It can be verified by anyone to be true, it isn't just true for me, it is true foe everyone.

The question wasn't about this moment.

Please give me an example of a question which isn't loaded.

Do you like coffee?

You made this claim earlier, but you say you can't prove it. How do you explain this contradiction?

I don't see a contradiction.

Saying something and being able to prove something are not interdependent.