It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HorusChrist
elves it'd make sense they'd support a pagan president no? wouldn't mind at least?
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: masqua
And Obama carried all those good luck charms in his pocket, so if we nit pick about every quirky belief, someone in offices has, might as well have a King.
some of the pagans posting here wouldn't mind a pagan president.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Funny how no one is talking about policy, just his religious views.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Funny how no one is talking about policy, just his religious views.
His religious views color his perception of reality, and therefore influence his decision making process and judgement.
“Pyramids were definitely used as tombs: burial equipment, such as sarcophagi, jewelry, mummies or mummy parts were found in some of them. (The others were robbed in antiquity, or in a few cases the burial chambers are below the water table.)”
Further proof they were tombs, not silos, is funerary text inscriptions inside chambers built around 2375 to ca 2160 B.C.E., to help the dead king in his journey to the afterworld, says Sweeney.
There is no evidence whatsoever that the pyramids were built by “Joseph” or anybody else except unhappy Egyptian farmers who, as the Nile flooded each year, had to leave their fields and would be coerced into construction projects, explains Prof. Orly Goldwasser, an Egyptologist from the Hebrew University.
Goldwasser also notes that pyramids began to be built some 5,000 years ago, and there is no record whatsoever of ancient Canaanites or Israelites or anybody but ancient Egyptians being around to do the labor. “The first mention of Israelites was in around 1200 B.C.E. – a difference of more than 1,000 years,” she says.
Nor is there any mention of “Joseph” in ancient Egyptian texts, Goldwasser clarifies. “The pyramids have no connection to the people of Israel or anything of the sort,” she concludes.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Funny how no one is talking about policy, just his religious views.
His religious views color his perception of reality, and therefore influence his decision making process and judgement.
How are his views any different than the current potus or those before him?
President Obama also does believe in evolution and supports teaching it in public school classrooms. He has also declared that intelligent design and creationism should not be taught in a science classroom as they are more religion and faith based.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: olaru12
Which candidates do not believe in creation?
What were the pyramids built for?
Do you have evidence that shows grain was never stored in the pyramids?
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
originally posted by: deadeyedick
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Funny how no one is talking about policy, just his religious views.
His religious views color his perception of reality, and therefore influence his decision making process and judgement.
How are his views any different than the current potus or those before him?
Well let's see..
Compared to Ben Carson who is a creationist, we have Obama who:
President Obama also does believe in evolution and supports teaching it in public school classrooms. He has also declared that intelligent design and creationism should not be taught in a science classroom as they are more religion and faith based.
about.com
So there you go, there's a difference right there.
How are his views any different than the current potus
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: deadeyedick
You asked if we had proof the pyramids weren't used for grain storage, as some sort of attempt to show that means that they could have been used as grain storage.
I suggested that since we have no proof Stonehenge was used as a picknick spot, that it could have been a picknick spot.
I'm following your lines of logic ...