It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: trifecta
a reply to: Vasa Croe
That video solved nothing.
A was an engineer working at a sewage treatment plant back in the 90's. The open aeration tanks had identical foam build up, typically on Monday mornings due to the rash of people doing laundry on the weekends. Hence the healthy swathe of detergent. The one thing the video is right about is the catalyst effect of human bio, detergent, and the chemicals used to treat the water cause that foam. Largely, the runoff foam was harmless when the water was treated, unlike India's case.
There is no way in hell the cloud from the first video is the same substance as the waste foam. No way! The densities and characteristics are light years apart. You don't need to be a scientist to see that from what is just show in the videos by comparison.
originally posted by: trifecta
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Not all unexplained phenomenon needs to be pigeonholed and rationalized by popular subscriptions. If you need to make leaps in logic just to line up an unknown with an established, clear cut known. Then it is wrong. You need to go back to the drawing board and devise a new formula. That "cloud" is breaking most laws of physics as we know. And calling it a hoax is just a placation and easy way out.
originally posted by: trifecta
Look closely into these cloud abberations. A trained eye can see distinguishable forms and shapes that mirror light beings. Many of these phenomenon is the result of the wall dropping between frequency mediums.
FYI, that video filmed in the ME with a man flirting with a haze is NOT a hoax. That is the real McCoy. Look deeper.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: trifecta
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Not all unexplained phenomenon needs to be pigeonholed and rationalized by popular subscriptions. If you need to make leaps in logic just to line up an unknown with an established, clear cut known. Then it is wrong. You need to go back to the drawing board and devise a new formula. That "cloud" is breaking most laws of physics as we know. And calling it a hoax is just a placation and easy way out.
Leap in logic?
So this being foam that floated away similar to the one in both videos, especially the one where the guy walks up to it and waves his hand around in it making a hole similar to what would happen in thick foam (think bubble bath here), is a bigger leap in logic than your proposed "wall dropping between frequency mediums" and "light beings"?
originally posted by: trifecta
Look closely into these cloud abberations. A trained eye can see distinguishable forms and shapes that mirror light beings. Many of these phenomenon is the result of the wall dropping between frequency mediums.
FYI, that video filmed in the ME with a man flirting with a haze is NOT a hoax. That is the real McCoy. Look deeper.
Wow....just WOW....smh.
originally posted by: trifecta
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: trifecta
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Not all unexplained phenomenon needs to be pigeonholed and rationalized by popular subscriptions. If you need to make leaps in logic just to line up an unknown with an established, clear cut known. Then it is wrong. You need to go back to the drawing board and devise a new formula. That "cloud" is breaking most laws of physics as we know. And calling it a hoax is just a placation and easy way out.
Leap in logic?
So this being foam that floated away similar to the one in both videos, especially the one where the guy walks up to it and waves his hand around in it making a hole similar to what would happen in thick foam (think bubble bath here), is a bigger leap in logic than your proposed "wall dropping between frequency mediums" and "light beings"?
originally posted by: trifecta
Look closely into these cloud abberations. A trained eye can see distinguishable forms and shapes that mirror light beings. Many of these phenomenon is the result of the wall dropping between frequency mediums.
FYI, that video filmed in the ME with a man flirting with a haze is NOT a hoax. That is the real McCoy. Look deeper.
Wow....just WOW....smh.
I have first hand experience with both mediums, do you?
When that gentleman plunged his hand into that "foam", it would have broke surface tension of surrounding areas in the foam too. That's what happens when you add additional volume to a mass under these conditions. Plus when he extracted his hand from the matter, if it was the same sewage treatment foam, his hand would have accumulated a healthy amount of the foam, statically. Which he did not. The man shaped a hole in the substance as if it was putty, as if the rest of the body was unmolested.
Now you can say the fence may have held a static charge to enable this act to play out, by maintaining form. But if that was the case, the hole would have dissolved onto the fence due to the static charge. the foam's outer surface tension would too have broke, being effected by the charged fence. Let's not forget how for the greater part of the video the foam maintained a seemingly geometric shape with nearly straight edges at some angles.
If there's electromagnetic forces at play in the physics of this "foam", it surely isn't coming from outside of the foam itself. The foam is the source, hence the light being. I'm sorry if my explanation is outside of your comfort level. A few years ago it would have been outside of mine too. Big changes are happening on this plane. This is just a taste of it.
Product Description
Classic Silica™ Aerogel Blocks have a square cross-section, flat surfaces, and sharp edges for applications where round shapes just won’t do. Great for experiments involving optics and projects where parts need to be mounted or tiled. Top side of the block may be slightly curved. Density is ~0.095 g/cm3. Dimensions are ~2.5 cm x 2.5 cm x 1.0 cm. Hydrophilic surface chemistry. 1 - $60, 20 or more, $40 each.
Typically same size blobs and particles go for $35 and $10 respectively.