Smoking gun emails reveal Blair's 'deal in blood' with George Bush over Iraq war was forged a YEAR b

originally posted by: EvanB
a reply to: Sublimecraft

Who is protecting these people??????

www.veteranstoday.com...

If this was insufficient to get complete control over a nation well then they would use false-flag terror to start wars and conflict whenever necessary to gain cheap access to the natural resources of these nations and further their own agenda of world domination.

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: EvanB

Blair, Bush, Howard and all of their respective associates should be tried for war crimes, it's that simple.

I agree.
Perhaps not war crimes, but premeditated conspiracy and treason.

a reply to: EvanB

Ummm...the Elite? Special interest groups??

originally posted by: zazzafrazz

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: EvanB

Blair, Bush, Howard and all of their respective associates should be tried for war crimes, it's that simple.

I agree.
Perhaps not war crimes, but premeditated conspiracy and treason.

I'd be just as happy with tar and feathers. We could even use all the pardoned turkeys from these scum, surely if they got pardoned they were criminals too.

a reply to: Salander

Truth is you are of a very small minority who refused to swallow the cool aid spouted by msm and government.. Most believed.. This highlights the duplicity and the fact there are dark forces who protect these people.. It highlights that there is a sort of shadow government with a very set agenda who are willing to destroy anyone and any country to achieve their aims.... It helps the majority to wake up

originally posted by: Rosinitiate

Funny how someone like David Icke can't be taken seriously because of his lizard rants yet hits the nail on the head so often. But because he is discredited by lizards (even though they rape people on the moon) no one can use him as a creditable source, true or not, it makes everything he says questionable.

Lizards, you say ... well, it pretty much shows that the guy is not in touch with reality. Therefore what he says, does not have a realistic inclination.

A memo, coming up now ... realistic?

To answer this, that a discussion between Bush and Blair occurred, where Blair pledged his undying devotion to Crazy King George of England ... sure. But a memo, popping up on the surface a whole decade after the fact ... is like the passport that landed unscathed on the streets of New York, on 911.

Yeah ... right.

originally posted by: bjarneorn

originally posted by: Rosinitiate

Funny how someone like David Icke can't be taken seriously because of his lizard rants yet hits the nail on the head so often. But because he is discredited by lizards (even though they rape people on the moon) no one can use him as a creditable source, true or not, it makes everything he says questionable.

Lizards, you say ... well, it pretty much shows that the guy is not in touch with reality. Therefore what he says, does not have a realistic inclination.

A memo, coming up now ... realistic?

To answer this, that a discussion between Bush and Blair occurred, where Blair pledged his undying devotion to Crazy King George of England ... sure. But a memo, popping up on the surface a whole decade after the fact ... is like the passport that landed unscathed on the streets of New York, on 911.

Yeah ... right.

But they knew the memo existed. The U.S refused to release any information to the Chilcott inquiry because they claimed it would be against national security interests.

This opens up a can of worms like no other because Blair claimed these discussions never happened. He was sounded out on a war in Iraq one year before the invasion, but denied this was the case.

Still, once a liar and all that.

a reply to: EvanB

Yet again I must apologise on behalf of my older schoolmates for not drowning Tony Blair when they had the chance. I went to a tough school in Durham not far from the posh school Tony Blair attended.

After attending The Chorister School in Durham from 1961 to 1966...

en.wikipedia.org... Naughty pupils from my school used to steal the choristers caps and throw them in the river. If only we'd known......

He was a chorister in Durham Cathedral. I've seen some very odd things in Durham Cathedral. I suspect that's where his possession started.

It is said he was in love with George Bush. Does anyone want to comment on the body language shown in those photographs?

Anthony Charles Lynton Blair (Tony Blair,former PM of the UK)
He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street magistrates court for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get sexual favour from the other man, little did he know that the toilet was being watched by police. Blair was fined £500, and walked away with nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court got him off with a fine, because he is one of them.

boltonbnp.blogspot.co.uk...

a reply to: EvanB

Here, some Special Branch, some spooks.

The media is run by spooks. There are traitors whose job it is to make up the news.

There are traitors who lead protest and 'fringe' politics.

If a thousand lone wolves act together, are they a pack?

Lone wolf is the only way to go. Lawful, peaceful, using only words and symbolic actions to take out the jugular.

a reply to: southbeach

Makes you wonder what people in the intelligence services are made of....

Terms and conditions do not allow an accurate answer to that question.

The numerous though historical personal accounts I've heard indicate an inverse relationship between ego and intelligence.

a reply to: EvanB

I would be interested in how early he committed to attacking. Bush campaigned on war with Iraq and the popular sentiment at the time was that if he was elected we would be in Iraq within the year. 9/11 actually delayed the invasion by years (and ultimately somehow justified it). Bush's former staffers have said the same thing, once he was elected their #1 priority was to find a legal way to attack Iraq.

Does this really surprise anyone? With the PNAC manifesto, this was kind of expected.

Then they needed a reason to go there, and 911 happened, oh so conveniently.

a reply to: Kester
I remember you posted this comment before. You must really regret not doing it. Don't worry nobody blames you

a reply to: EvanB

Yet, nothing will happen to the "untouchables" in the light of thee new emails, that condemn Bush and Blair as war criminals. They will continue to walk free, and possibly sip on Margarita's as they read the headlines and joke about the good ol' days.

originally posted by: IlluminatiTechnician
a reply to: EvanB

Yet, nothing will happen to the "untouchables" in the light of thee new emails, that condemn Bush and Blair as war criminals. They will continue to walk free, and possibly sip on Margarita's as they read the headlines and joke about the good ol' days.

Indeed, and reminisce over the false flags they pulled off.

I'm glad this thread is getting exposure, but technically we've known about this report since 2006:

originally posted by: EvanB
a reply to: Sublimecraft

Who is protecting these people??????

The US Military. No seriously, the US in 2002 passed the "American Service-Members' Protection Act", better known as the "Hague Invasion Act". Here's a paragraph about it from a Human Rights Watch article:

U.S. President George Bush today signed into law the American Servicemembers Protection Act of 2002, which is intended to intimidate countries that ratify the treaty for the International Criminal Court (ICC). The new law authorizes the use of military force to liberate any American or citizen of a U.S.-allied country being held by the court, which is located in The Hague. This provision, dubbed the "Hague invasion clause," has caused a strong reaction from U.S. allies around the world, particularly in the Netherlands.

U.S.: 'Hague Invasion Act' Becomes Law

EDIT: It's even more eye opening when you realize it was passed before the Iraq War/Invasion, as if they knew the legal ramifications beforehand.

a reply to: stonerwilliam

More vindication that CTs got it by the quoyounnies!

a reply to: enlightenedservant

Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I had never heard of the act until now.

No wonder Blair was given the task of chief child catcher in the Middle East, he is as safe as the U.S want him to be and I guess for now at least, he is as safe as a real safe thing, kept in a safe in Safesville.

Here's the wiki page -

en.m.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
It'll never happen. The Spinmiesters will spin, the obfuscators will obfuscate, and the media will censor it.

Don't be so pessimistic. Eventually those guilty will retire, die off, along with their cronies and influence. Meanwhile there will always be ever-growing support for those willing to seek the truth.

We thought Tony Blair and New Labour were going to rule the UK forever. Now because they tried to silence any political discussion or debate through the use of the "racist" word, that party is now political history forever associated with the label "Pedophile Protection Party".