It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: infolurker
Yea that's fine... but these polls indicate that a minority of Muslims support violence. Especially violence when on the offence. And most especially in the West. The poll results paint a very different picture than that offered by the OP.
originally posted by: Willtell
The enemy is Wabbabi and Salafi religion if it does spread we do have a problem.
The enemy is ALL fundamentalist religion
America should have never supported these religious freaks and they still do it.
Ask yourself where they were before Afghanistan
Where was the radical Islam problem before Afghanistan?
They were radicalized by the US in order to beat Russia in Afghanistan
Unfortunately the Saudi wealth is buying a lot of religious conversions through their
On one level its good that its coming out so the world can beat it.
Religious fundamentalism though is not just from Islam folks look at the story in the paper today about the Christians who killed a kid the other day excorcising the devil
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: Sremmos80
Pick and choose any you want... they can't all be wrong.
Everyone needs to open their eyes and ears and accept reality.
Welcome to the real Islam.
Islam, the world's fastest-growing faith, will leap from 1.6 billion (in 2010) to 2.76 billion by 2050, according to the Pew study. At that time, Muslims will make up nearly one-third of the world's total projected population of about 9 billion people.
Growth of religion is the spread of religion and the increase of religious adherents around the world. The statistics are commonly measured by the absolute number of adherents, the percentage of the absolute growth per year, and the growth of the number of converts in the world. Studies show that, in terms of percentage and world wide spread, Islam is the fastest-growing religion in the world.
originally posted by: tony9802
This very informative article was published just today, and is presently fresh off of the press..
OCT 15, 2015
www.raymondibrahim.com...
During a recent televised interview with Grand Ayatollah Ahmad al-Baghdadi, the leading Shia cleric of Iraq made clear why Islam and the rest of the world can never peacefully coexist.
The Grand Ayatollah
First he spent some time discussing “defensive jihad,” saying that all capable Muslims are obligated to fight for the “liberation” of “occupied” territory, for instance, Israel (see here for a list of European countries also deemed “occupied” in the eyes of Islam).
He then explained “offensive jihad,” Islam’s primary bloodline, which forged what we now call the “Muslim world” over the centuries.
According to the ayatollah, when they can—when circumstance permits it, when they are strong enough—Muslims are obligated to go on the offensive and conquer non-Muslims (a fact to be kept in mind as millions of Muslim “refugees” flood the West).
The Muslim cleric repeatedly yelled at the secularized host who kept interrupting him and protesting that Islam cannot teach such intolerance. At one point, he burst out: “I am the scholar of Islam [al-faqih]. You are just a journalist. Listen to me!”
Expounded Al-Baghdadi:
If they are people of the book [Jews and Christians] we demand of them the jizya—and if they refuse, then we fight them. That is if he is Christian. He has three choices: either convert to Islam, or, if he refuses and wishes to remain Christian, then pay the jizya [and live according to dhimmi rules].
But if they still refuse—then we fight them, and we abduct their women, and destroy their churches—this is Islam!… Come on, learn what Islam is, are you even a Muslim?!
As for the polytheists [Hindus, Buddhists, etc.] we allow them to choose between Islam and war! This is not the opinion of Ahmad al-Husseini al-Baghdadi, but the opinion of all five schools of jurisprudence [four Sunni and one Shia].
Towards the end of the interview, because the clean-shaven, suit-and-tie-wearing host kept protesting that this cannot be Islam, the ayatollah burst out, pointing at him with contempt and saying, “Who are you? You’re going to tell me what to believe? This is the word of Allah!”
Link again:www.raymondibrahim.com...
Written by Raymond Ibrahim
www.raymondibrahim.com...
Comments anyone?
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: infolurker
Yea that's fine... but these polls indicate that a minority of Muslims support violence. Especially violence when on the offence. And most especially in the West. The poll results paint a very different picture than that offered by the OP.
News for ya. A MAJORITY, not minority, of Muslims support violence via Sharia Law.
"Sharia law is gaining ground across the world. An overwhelming majority of Muslims support the implementation of Islamic law in Muslim countries,Sharia law is gaining ground across the world. An overwhelming majority of Muslims support the implementation of Islamic law in Muslim countries, in non-Muslim countries- in any country where they live.
chersonandmolschky.com...
those who repress anger and who forgive men, verily, God loves the doers of good. (Quran 3:134)
In the Torah We made mandatory for the Jews these rules of retaliation: Capital punishment for the murder of a person; an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and a just compensation for a wound.
If the perpetrator is forgiven by the affected party, this will suffice as atonement for his crime. Those who do not judge according to what God has revealed are unjust. (Quran 5:45)
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
All religions have been reduced to reactionary sects, as opposed to the respectable institutions of long ago. What insights do they possess in regards to ecology? technology? biology? physics? sexuality? ...anything? Nothing new has come out of them in hundreds, sometimes thousands of years, and all they can do is react to the changes instead of adapt. It is quite apparent they are being left behind, and the only way they can retain any sort of power is through reactionary violence and fear. They are irrelevant, so let's not pretend they are relevant.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: Reallyfolks
Of course there were radicalized but not nearly to the degree you have today because of Afghanistan…911…war in Iraq...ISIS
You had a few Muslim brotherhood people indeed.
But I’m talking about in the 70’s and 80’s
I know I was there when it all started in Afghanistan when they radicalized the Afghan muhajjadin.
Also the wealth of Saudi in spreading Wahhabi/Salafi Islam is also responsible.
I was there back in the day.
Was a member of one of the first huge Islamic US communities.
We had arguments all the time with the fundamentalists from Saudi and Pakistan/Afghanistan
At the time they weren’t radicalized or violent but still had that silly fundamentalism: eating with their hands, putting all kinds of curtains on their woman and were literalist and believed in an eternal hell.
The Saudis tried to bribe us to carry their way but we refused to accept their backward crooked Islam.
Then one day a guy from the CIA told our leader regarding his followers---moderate Muslims
"THESE ARE OUR NIGG__S
"You wont be allowed to get too big"
Then later we broke up through division sowed by people like the Saudi's
originally posted by: Willtell
....When the REAL ISIS appears will change occur?
the present ISIS is the artificial
like the Christ/ anti/Christ
There is a real ISIS and an anti-ISIS in which where seeing now
One thing heralds glad tidings:
good news
...there’s an old Sufi aphorism
"The artificial proves the existence of the genuine"
When the real ISIS appears the world will truly change...
And what is the real ISIS
That’s a secret even WillTell Won’t Tell