Former George Bush Chief Economist Says 911 Was An Inside Job

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

Nothing there that temperatures reached over 3000 degrees. You didn't read the report correctly because the high temperatures the RJ Lee Group speaks of refers typical fires.

In addition, iron flakes melt at much lower temperatures than an iron beam. Read the report properly before I have to correct you again.

The presence of lead oxides on the surface of
mineral wool indicates the exposure of
high temperatures at which lead
would have undergone vaporization, ox
idation, and condensation on the
surface of mineral wool.


UNDERGONE VAPORIZATION thats it right there, if you don't understand its your loss..

a reply to: wildb

That did not come from the RJ Lee Group. what you posted came from this website.

Point TT-6: The Claim that There Was No Molten Steel or Iron in the WTC

www.consensus911.org...

You tied to pull a fast one and it didn't work. Now, for the rest of the story.

RJ Lee Group WTC Dust Sample Chart

Nothing on the RJ Lee Group that indicated the presence of explosives. Now, let's continue.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

That did not come from the RJ Lee Group. what you posted came from this website.

Point TT-6: The Claim that There Was No Molten Steel or Iron in the WTC

www.consensus911.org...

You tied to pull a fast one and it didn't work.

No it came from you, now who's trying to pull a fast one, getting desperate sky..



Your post... www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: wildb

That won't fly, and here's more that you somehow, overlooked.

The RJ Lee Group Report

The RJ Lee Group report considers samples taken several months after the collapses, and it is certain that torch-cutting of steel beams as part of the cleanup process contributed some, if not all, of the spherules seen in these samples.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

That won't fly, and here's more that you somehow, overlooked.

The RJ Lee Group Report

The RJ Lee Group report considers samples taken several months after the collapses, and it is certain that torch-cutting of steel beams as part of the cleanup process contributed some, if not all, of the spherules seen in these samples.

Deflecting again, face it, you have lost the argument, My point stands, you have failed...

a reply to: wildb

Nope, and here's something else you had overlooked. Thanks for providing the reference.

RJ Lee Group Dust Sample

This frightening "cocktail" of environmental contamination had never been seen before.

It contained components from the planes, jet fuel, fires, standard building materials and electronics that had been pulverized into a fine dust that permeated everything.

www.wtcreflections.rjlg.com...

Nothing there about explosives.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

Nope, and here's something else you had overlooked. Thanks for providing the reference.

RJ Lee Group Dust Sample

This frightening "cocktail" of environmental contamination had never been seen before.

It contained components from the planes, jet fuel, fires, standard building materials and electronics that had been pulverized into a fine dust that permeated everything.

www.wtcreflections.rjlg.com...

Nothing there about explosives.

We're not talking about explosives, do you have little voices in your head ?? another deflection, you can't defend yourself so you try to change the subject. What is it you say, that won't fly, yes it will not..

a reply to: wildb

We're not talking about explosives,...

Good, because no evidence of explosives was ever found at WTC ground zero.

No Evidence of Explosive or Thermite Found

The R.J. Lee Company did a 2003 study on the dust and didn't find thermitic material. Other sampling of the pulverized dust by United States Geological Survey and RJ Lee did not report any evidence of thermite or explosives. It has been theorized the "thermite material" found was primer paint.

No evidence has ever been found of explosive charges and there are no recordings of a series of very loud explosions that would have been expected with controlled demolition. Furthermore, there is an alternative explanation for the "thermitic material" the sceptical scientists found in the dust - it is just a type of primer paint. It's calculated 1,200,000 tonnes of building materials were pulverised at the World Trade Center and most minerals are present in the dust (not necessarily in a large quantity).

More extensive sampling of the dust has not found any evidence of thermite or explosives, says a report from the US Geological Survey and another from RJ Lee.

www.bbc.com...

.

Good, because no evidence of explosives was ever found at WTC ground zero.

And here is why, start at 5:15 into the video..

a reply to: wildb

You have to remember that anything with AE911 Truth stamped on it has been discredited. Do a background check on the discredited AE911 Truth group. Even some of the former associates of AE911 Truth have jumped ship due to that group's financial misconduct, lies, dishonesty and the passing of disinformation.

I might add that there have been cases where 9/11 conspiracy theorist and even VA Today have attacked the discredited AE911 Truth group.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

You have to remember that anything with AE911 Truth stamped on it has been discredited. Do a background check on the discredited AE911 Truth group. Even some of the former associates of AE911 Truth have jumped ship due to that group's financial misconduct, lies, dishonesty and the passing of disinformation.

I might add that there have been cases where 9/11 conspiracy theorist and even VA Today have attacked the discredited AE911 Truth group.

Debunked as well, the woman stands on her own and has the credentials to back it up..

a reply to: wildb

Debunked as well, the woman stands on her own and has the credentials to back it up..

False! She is not supported by the structural, architect, and demolition communities.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Why would she be, and who says you? yeah ok, she is a scientist with awards, she is talking about the investigation and how it was done, and she is correct...

a reply to: wildb

Why would she be, and who says you? yeah ok, she is a scientist with awards, she is talking about the investigation and how it was done, and she is correct...

She is one, whereas, hundreds of thousands of experts do not agree with her. Would you like to see the numbers?

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

Why would she be, and who says you? yeah ok, she is a scientist with awards, she is talking about the investigation and how it was done, and she is correct...

She is one, whereas, hundreds of thousands of experts do not agree with her. Would you like to see the numbers?

How do they not agree with her, and who would that be, lets see some interviews about that..

a reply to: wildb

First of all, what did she say about the red/gray chips in that video? it was later determined the chips were primer paint.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

First of all, what did she say about the red/gray chips in that video? it was later determined the chips were primer paint.

Deflecting again sky, what she said was true, it was proven by people and labs around the world, I do not buy the paint chip story, these people and organizations are not going to make fools of themselves.

For those of you looking in lets see how sky guy is going to discredit this woman...

Lynn Margulis attended the University of Chicago as an undergraduate, graduating with an A.B. in Liberal Arts in 1957, when she was only 19 years old. In 1960, she received her M. S. degree in genetics and zoology from the University of Wisconsin. Margulis received her Ph.D. in Genetics in 1963, from the University of California, Berkeley.

Margulis also has served as Chair of the National Academy of Science's Space Science Board Committee on Planetary Biology and Chemistry Evolution (1977-1980). In 1983, she was elected a member of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (Sehi 2001). Margulis held two fellowships after completing her doctoral degree, the Sherman Fairchild Fellowship in the Geological and Planetary Sciences Department at California Institute of Technology (1977) and the Guggenheim Fellowship for her work on microbial mats (Sehi 2001). Among the many awards Margulis has received are eight honorary doctorates (by 2001), and induction into the World Academy of Art and Science (1995), the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences (1997), and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1998) (Sehi 2001). In 1999, she was awarded the National Medal of Science. Margulis is profiled in a book published in 2006, by Resurgence Magazine in the United Kingdom, called Visionaries: The 20th Century's 100 Most Important Inspirational Leaders

Margulis was the first wife of astronomer Carl Sagan and is the mother of Dorion Sagan, popular science writer and co-author; Jeremy Sagan, software developer and founder of Sagan Technology; Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma, New York City Criminal Defense lawyer; and Jennifer Margulis, teacher and author. In 2006, with her son Dorion, Margulis founded Sciencewriters Books, an imprint of Chelsea Green Publishing for science books.

www.newworldencyclopedia.org...

originally posted by: wildb

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

First of all, what did she say about the red/gray chips in that video? it was later determined the chips were primer paint.

Deflecting again sky, what she said was true, it was proven by people and labs around the world, I do not buy the paint chip story, these people and organizations are not going to make fools of themselves.

She is delusional. I have shown in previous threads that Jones' own data is thermodynamically inconsistent with any such "thermitic material." Further, demolitions using thermite cannot be timed which is why noisy, high brisance explosives are used in building demolitions and not thermite.
The chips were primer paint on gray iron oxide scale.

ETA: Margulis is a BIOLOGIST. Ask her opinions if you think tapeworms caused the WTC to collapse.

originally posted by: pteridine

originally posted by: wildb

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

First of all, what did she say about the red/gray chips in that video? it was later determined the chips were primer paint.

Deflecting again sky, what she said was true, it was proven by people and labs around the world, I do not buy the paint chip story, these people and organizations are not going to make fools of themselves.

She is delusional. I have shown in previous threads that Jones' own data is thermodynamically inconsistent with any such "thermitic material." Further, demolitions using thermite cannot be timed which is why noisy, high brisance explosives are used in building demolitions and not thermite.
The chips were primer paint on gray iron oxide scale.

Yeah, read my above post, she sure is...