It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
will they have to remove the baphomet monument as well?
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Krazysh0t
If it was paid for by private money it should not be in government property.
Still I find interesting that most laws are base in the 10 commandments or they are used to refer as moral standing and rules from ancient society to todays modern society.
originally posted by: marg6043
Still I find interesting that most laws are base in the 10 commandments or they are used to refer as moral standing and rules from ancient society to todays modern society.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Who really cares about a few statues and a few chairs.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Who really cares about a few statues and a few chairs.
Probably no one.
Unless the statues and chairs represent one specific religion on government property, which is a violation of Church and State.
Other religions have been rejected to place a monument next to a Christian monument that's on government property. Its not just atheists.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Who really cares about a few statues and a few chairs.
Probably no one.
Unless the statues and chairs represent one specific religion on government property, which is a violation of Church and State.
Other religions have been rejected to place a monument next to a Christian monument that's on government property. Its not just atheists.
If you are going to be intimidated and offended by a statue placed on the ground in a public space then I feel a little pity for you
I dont see how this impinges on your rights to live and enjoy life.
Nor do I see how a statue of bhapomet impinges on a Christians rights to live and enjoy life.
Fundys are all crazy
originally posted by: AMPTAH
What I want to know, is when are they going to take "IN GOD WE TRUST" off the dollar bill. So, we can finally separate GOD from our FEDERAL MONEY. Who want's to walk around with GOD in their pocket everyday?
. . . the three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York noted that the courts have long looked at the motto not so much as the entanglement of government in religion, but as a more general statement of optimism and a "reference to the country’s religious heritage."
"Tradition is a terrible excuse for any behavior," said American Atheists spokesman David Muscato. "If we allowed ‘tradition’ to guide our views, what else would we uphold -- slavery, denying the vote to women? The simple fact is that ‘In God We Trust’ has no rightful place on currency in the United States, a country with separation of church and state, and it never has."
www.huffingtonpost.com...
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Seeing a sign that says something about Loving God isn't promoting religion either.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Take out the four that have to do with God then I'm fine with it. Because that is what it also tells you, that you need to worship the god of the OT, who by the way was an a hole.
Acting like this doesn't promote religion is pretty disengenous.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Seeing a sign that says something about Loving God isn't promoting religion either.
Then what's the point?
Of course its promoting religion.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Plenty of people evidently, no wonder ISIS destroys culturally significant monuments.
I dont see the difference between what IS do and what has happened here, except the culturaly significance of the item.
This world deserves whats comming