Rush Limburgh: Water on Mars a NASA lie to advance leftist agenda!!

a reply to: neo96

When Damon is famously known for his ultra left wing views. Hell the only movies he does are one with heavily political over tones.

Good Will hunting and True Grit had political overtones?

a reply to: NihilistSanta

That is a two sided coin, how do we know extremist don't look to suppress science.

Only one person,IMO, is being dishonest here.
That would be Rush for being so quick to say is it a lie to support some leftist agenda that he doesn't even what that would be.

He is just throwing spaghetti at the wall and hoping it sticks.

a reply to: buster2010

Gee YA THINK ?

Anything even remotely connected to Obama has an agenda behind it.

Water on Mars?

Sure something is cooking and Obama is involved.

The general "wording" of the "announcement" might have clues.

originally posted by: neo96
Rush DOES have a point.

The only point Limbaugh has is on top of his head. Without that, he is both literally and figuratively pointless.

This week, NASA scientists announced that they had found chemical evidence of liquid water on the surface of Mars. While they make a compelling case, the existence of seasonal rivers of briney water will never be 100 percent confirmed until we can see it and touch it and analyse it, and if it’s not actual humans on Mars doing that, we’ll have to study it vicariously through our far-flung robots.

Except we can’t. Not as long as those far-flung robots originated on Earth, anyway. Right now, NASA’s Curiosity rover is about 50 kilometres from the site that scientists suspect holds liquid Martian water, but thanks to an international treaty signed in 1967, it’s not allowed to go anywhere near it.

This is because to get where it is on the surface of Mars, Curiosity had to travel 225 million kilometres from Earth through space, and along the way it could have picked up dirt and dust and all kinds of mysterious microbes that make it far from sterile. As Marcus Strom points out at The Sydney Morning Herald, "That's a long way to go without having the right sort of shower."

Here’s why NASA’s Mars rovers are banned from investigating that liquid water

Hmmmm.

a reply to: xuenchen

So it is the fault of obama that there was a treaty signed in 1967?!?!

Holy hell, talk about omnipotent!

He really is the messiah!!

stipulations of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, which forbids "anyone from sending a mission, robot or human, close to a water source in the fear of contaminating it with life from Earth

originally posted by: neo96
Rush DOES have a point.

If there is flowing water on mars the global warming crowd Has to rethink their so called 'science'.

TOTALLY different environmental factors exist on Mars compared to Earth.

Back to Rush bashing because the guy does HAVE a point.

WHAT?

If there's "water" (actually a really really thick brine), what's that got to do with global warming at all. Is there any amount of willful ignorance that is too much? You're seriously going to try to defend this outright insanity?

a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul

If they say they found flowing water, next they're going to find a graveyard.

So, this graveyard of course will be make believe. And NASA - the entire space program - all those employees and money - and time - and whatever - were just so we could go to Mars and make up a graveyard (or something...) so that we could say - global warming killed the Martians

All that money going towards a fictitious cautionary tale so that the liberal powers that be can have - more money?

My head is going to explode - how much crazy are we supposed to accept from one human being with a microphone?

Meanwhile - the obvious liberal plot completely goes over his head

Water means life is possible. Not probable - nothing for sure - but possible. It's something we're actually looking for - for reals

And what would that mean Rush?

a reply to: neo96

Um.. that's the NSA, not NASA. Different agencies ya know?

a reply to: theantediluvian

doesn't matter - he's a librul, so evil.

a reply to: projectbane

Speculation aside, can you prove anything that they may have lied about? Or is it pure speculation.

Ive heard others say the same, that nasa always lies, but i need to know about what and can it be proven?

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: neo96

Um.. that's the NSA, not NASA. Different agencies ya know?

Even bother to READ that was a reply to?

Apparently not.

Good Will hunting and True Grit had political overtones?

So apparently Damon 'doesn't do politics.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: MrSpad

Pretty easy to do.

How the hell can Mars have 'flowing water' no atmosphere. No industrialization. No fossile fuels emitting 'co2', and all the other rubbish.

Climate change 'scientists' are saying is causing the Earth to warm up.

Global warming does create warmer temperatures, that turn ice in to wait for it ?

Running water.

The two can be compared rather easily.

Because planetary 'mechanics' don't change from one place to the other.

Oh you see there is this big thing in the middle of the solar system we call the Sun. Since we have known frozen water is on Mars since 2008 (unless that was Bush plot) we also know that Mars rotates around the Sun. When Mars is closest point to Sun parts of the planet get just warm enough that some water melts and flows. We also have this phenomenon on Earth, we call it summer. The snow melts and it gets warmer. How you are going to get to some how relate climate change to that is beyond me.

somehow going to find its way into a technique to advance the leftist agenda. I don't know what it is

So then maybe he should shut the hell up until some semblance of a conspiracy actually appears?

And I thought he was going to say they will say they found life and that invalidates our religions. At least that would be a logical conspiracy.

a reply to: MrSpad

We also have this thing called politicians never letting a 'crisis' go to waste.

Which ironically enough was the point Rush was making.

Why yes people there sure isn't 'nothing' political about climate change.

And there sure isn't 'nothing' political about NASA.

And there isn't sure 'nothing' political about Hollywood.

Back to FAUX outrage.

a reply to: neo96

So apparently Damon 'doesn't do politics.

So what if he does do politics? Politically motivated movies are not a crime - unless you have some free speech restrictions you'd like to lay out on your table for us

Art is political sometimes

Even if this Mars movie is somehow political - so what? Do you believe Obama has been biding his time, waiting until he's almost out of office to make his final move and conquer the planet - with Matt Damon and The Martian?

:-)

I think maybe you and Rush have both lost the plot

If the Martian is going to be anything like Elysium ?

Ya know that movie that was about open borders, and free healthcare throw in a splash of the evil one percent for dramtic effect ?

The Martian is going to be lame.

If you like the Martian? You can keep the Martian.

a reply to: Spiramirabilis

So what if he does do politics? Politically motivated movies are not a crime - unless you have some free speech restrictions you'd like to lay out on your table for us

OMG LOL

That was Rush's ENTIRE POINT.

a reply to: neo96
That wasn't the point he was making at all....

The only faux outrage in this thread is you over the responses.