It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: deliberator
TheLamb. This is what I would consider to be mathematics. A mathematician proposes a mathematical probability that Jesus is the Christ (notice he says probability not proof).
Mathematical Probability that Jesus is the Christ
..................
originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: Rex282
And? Could you tell us what you think that all means? Because it's a bunch of numbers that don't mean anything to me. I guess one has to have a belief that it means something or else it just looks like you are arbitrarily adding and dividing some numbers that need to be translated by someone who believes they mean something.
originally posted by: Rex282
I was not attempting to prove God exists as the OP claimed their post was.I was denying the ignorance of the unsubstantial evidence of proof of the OP’s ludicrous claim and provided the true evidence of math being written in the scripture.The last 9 pages haven’t proven that there is a God or that there isn’t a God nor will anyone ever do either
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Rex282
I was not attempting to prove God exists as the OP claimed their post was.I was denying the ignorance of the unsubstantial evidence of proof of the OP’s ludicrous claim and provided the true evidence of math being written in the scripture.The last 9 pages haven’t proven that there is a God or that there isn’t a God nor will anyone ever do either
pareidolia by any other name...
There is math embedded in the writings of the scriptures.The most apparent is in Hebrew Gematria and Greek Isopsephy where letters equal numbers.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
..................................
I tell you what though, If you feel like you could explain your particular process to me, and account for all the steps you take (like, why choose the words you choose, and why divide instead of multiply). and answer my questions, i would be happy to join you in a new thread. Take your time, make it good and send me an invite. We'll talk about it and i'll give you my professional advice on why it does or does not stand up to scrutiny.
originally posted by: Rex282
originally posted by: Woodcarver
..................................
I tell you what though, If you feel like you could explain your particular process to me, and account for all the steps you take (like, why choose the words you choose, and why divide instead of multiply). and answer my questions, i would be happy to join you in a new thread. Take your time, make it good and send me an invite. We'll talk about it and i'll give you my professional advice on why it does or does not stand up to scrutiny.
Okay I'll take you up on.However I prefer you to start a thread or post in this one.Let me know which ,I have most of my answer already written.Thanks
originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: Rex282
Geez, i'll start it this weekend. But if i have to name the thread, You're probably not going to like it. See ya there.