Turning our backs on Islam.

a reply to: cavtrooper7

Sweet rant, not sure I got all of it but I know you tend to talk different based on your background.

ISLAM MUST KILL its own or pay a horrible price ,fence sitting is going to get MORE killed.

Who MUST they kill?

And who else needs to be killing people to police their culture?

I won't be held accountable for NUTS

Then extend that to other people, if you feel you should not be held accountable for nuts then NO ONE SHOULD.

Islam doesn't need your sympathy, and it doesn't care whether you turn your back on it or give it hugs.

The fact is, Islam wasn't always this lumbering universal foe. Globalists hate Islam and they've made it the West's enemy, without your knowledge or consent. They poked a beehive and now you're blaming the bees that sting you, rather than the ones who poked the hive. As always, the hive-pokers do the thinking for most Westerners.

Islam will not go quietly. A lot of people are going to die before Islam gasps it's last breath. My guess is that, after many decades of violence, the globalists will finally succeed in making Islam a husk, an impotent shadow of its former self. Then it will be just like Christianty, another failed religion with no real power.

Westerners get spooked by their own shadow because they're gullible and stupid. Then someone tells them that this shadow is Islam, and they gobble it up.

a reply to: Vroomfondel

Yes I said us white guys, as I am a blue eyed blond haired guy.
Thesaneone said I was saying only white people shoot, try some reading comprehension, no where did I say that.

So no, it was not quoted correctly, NO WHERE did I say it was ONLY them. Just asked about them specifically.
My words are asking what people have done to police their own, and you want to bring up legislature that was fought tooth and nail calming it was backed!? What world do you live in??
Or saying that people supported calling them terrorist?! Holy hell, hello fantasy land.

What laws are you even talking about btw? What were the new ones in response to each shooting.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

Ya it was that they can't live with the west.

Do you know how many live peacefully in the states and integrate just fine?

No one knows how many, including you.

The people who parked a car bomb under the world trade center were believed to have integrated just fine. The Boston marathon bombers were believed to have integrated just fine. Everyone is believed to have integrated just fine, until they prove they didn't.

When is it ok to be proactive? How many people have to die before you will acknowledge that reactive may not be the best method of dealing with this situation? You seem to fully support their "integration" with the west. How many attacks do we have to endure before you start to share the responsibility for the acts of violent aggression they commit?

The problem is not the REAL refugees it is those who take advantage of their need and situation. According German press 1 of 3 documents are fake.
Rt
In my country they estimated 1of 4 so far.
This situation seems preplanned as how all those "Fakes" start immigrating at once. Even real refugees are concerned about this and how it reflects on their situation to get safe place.


Something is definately cooking and Merkel made a HUGE mistake

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Vroomfondel

Yes I said us white guys, as I am a blue eyed blond haired guy.
Thesaneone said I was saying only white people shoot, try some reading comprehension, no where did I say that.

So no, it was not quoted correctly, NO WHERE did I say it was ONLY them. Just asked about them specifically.
My words are asking what people have done to police their own, and you want to bring up legislature that was fought tooth and nail calming it was backed!? What world do you live in??
Or saying that people supported calling them terrorist?! Holy hell, hello fantasy land.

What laws are you even talking about btw? What were the new ones in response to each shooting.

You are playing word games. YOU need some reading comprehension. You stated white guys. You did not say anyone else or imply that your statement included anyone else. You said white guys. You didn't have to, but you did. You could have left it at your culture. That included a lot of people. But you singled out white guys. It doesn't matter how much you try to backpedal and rewrite it now, the truth is out there for everyone to see.

These word games you play are getting old, and are treading very close to full blown trolling.

a reply to: Vroomfondel

Two examples?

There are millions living here for decades.

PEOPLE in general are going to be violent, our own citizens kill more of us then anyone else, lets worry about them before we worry about others.

We are being proactive btw, these refugees are not just getting flown over and dropped off, they go are going through a 16 month vetting process.

a reply to: dollukka

Wow....even the refugees know something is "rotten in Denmark".

Why? Why? Why? are western governments allowing this?

a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Charlie,

I just sent you a somewhat substantial PM. I know it's not always easy to see the notifications that we have a PM.

I am curious as to your feedback

a reply to: Vroomfondel

Not my fault you and thesaneone are putting only in there when I didn't say it.

I am not hiding from what I said, I asked what that poster has done about his culture which would be white male.

Never did I say that we are the only ones doing the killing.

Only ones playing word games are you guys trying to twist.


Do you apologize and push for gun laws when ever someone goes and kills people with a gun?
Do you feel the need to do so?
www.abovetopsecret.com... Great thread on this topic of people needing to apologize and police their own.
Go get educated.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: dollukka

Wow....even the refugees know something is "rotten in Denmark".

Why? Why? Why? are western governments allowing this?

Why do you think they're allowing it? Maybe you'll find that the most obvious answer is the right one, even if that answer is bitter and frightening.

a reply to: queenofswords

Because we can't punish the many of the few.

Of course people are going to take advantage, does that me we shaft all those that need the help?

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Vroomfondel

Two examples?

There are millions living here for decades.

PEOPLE in general are going to be violent, our own citizens kill more of us then anyone else, lets worry about them before we worry about others.

We are being proactive btw, these refugees are not just getting flown over and dropped off, they go are going through a 16 month vetting process.

So the problem is just two examples... Its not the quantity of the examples, its the quality. But just for arguments sake, how many would be enough?

a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

From the Quran:

Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors. And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers.

— Qur'an, [Quran 2:191]

I guess its how you interpret the Quran. It clearly says "kill them where ever you find them".

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs

originally posted by: Vroomfondel

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Vroomfondel

Yes I said us white guys, as I am a blue eyed blond haired guy.
Thesaneone said I was saying only white people shoot, try some reading comprehension, no where did I say that.

So no, it was not quoted correctly, NO WHERE did I say it was ONLY them. Just asked about them specifically.
My words are asking what people have done to police their own, and you want to bring up legislature that was fought tooth and nail calming it was backed!? What world do you live in??
Or saying that people supported calling them terrorist?! Holy hell, hello fantasy land.

What laws are you even talking about btw? What were the new ones in response to each shooting.

You are playing word games. YOU need some reading comprehension. You stated white guys. You did not say anyone else or imply that your statement included anyone else. You said white guys. You didn't have to, but you did. You could have left it at your culture. That included a lot of people. But you singled out white guys. It doesn't matter how much you try to backpedal and rewrite it now, the truth is out there for everyone to see.

These word games you play are getting old, and are treading very close to full blown trolling.

Says the troll.

This post serves no purpose other than name-calling. It does nothing to advance the conversation or the thread. Any comments from the mods?

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

Ya it was that they can't live with the west.

Do you know how many live peacefully in the states and integrate just fine?

Actually...I said "we shouldn't mix". It was also prefixed with...."my feeling on the subject is".

In the states there are...0,3 % Muslims of the total world Muslim population. It is those that came escaping from wherever they are from. Also...some of those are naturally born Americans that converted to Islam.

I'm not sure if they are on the same page with the rest of the 97 % that occupy middle east, north Africa , subsaharan area, and south/southeast Asia.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: queenofswords

Because we can't punish the many of the few.

Of course people are going to take advantage, does that me we shaft all those that need the help?

Well, the stakes are too high where this kind of thing is concerned. We have radical Islamists creating havoc and perpetrating violence all over the place. Infiltrating legitimate refugees is a problem because of the type of people they are. It can no longer be a case of "we can't punish the many because of the few". We CAN and we MUST or find a way to eliminate the infiltrators.

a reply to: Vroomfondel

It wouldn't, because we could go tit for tat all day because american citizens kill more citizens then anyone else.

I know it is the cool thing to be scared of the scary muslims, but they are really the last people you should be scared of in your everyday life.

a reply to: queenofswords

Fema camps until the infiltrators are eliminated.