9/11 Bombshell: Methodical Deception -- Rebekah Roth

a reply to: DarthFazer

I won't elaborate but this all started in 1913 when the 16th and 17th amendments were ratified. That put bankers in control of the federal government. Nixon took the nation off of the gold standard to pay for illegally fighting the Vietnam War, George H.W Bush negotiated and Bill "slick willy" Clinton ratified NAFTA. It has been all downhill from there. Nothing this federal government has done in the past 20/30 years has been to the benefit of we. That is the Damn truth.

Over half way into the video and I cannot believe the sheer amount of "coincidences", people connected to people, business connected to businesses etc the amount of these coincidences particularly centering around Barbra Olsen and the law firm she worked for is staggering and seriously defies any odds. Talk about wheels within wheels! That information coupled with the information relating to cell phones/air phones which most already knew, means to me that if just 1 incident is proven a complete fabrication such as all the alleged phone calls to loved ones, then its not beyond the realms of possibility that it all was. What makes me sad is wondering what happened to these people on the planes and what they must have gone through. Were they forced to make these recordings? Were they "in" on it all? Were they relocated and given new identities? Or just disposed of like trash once the job was done to tie up loose ends? Very frightening indeed

As a sidenote I will wait for the suicide of Rebekah Roth with a heavy heart

a reply to: jude11. Never forget, ninety percent of the post is untrue.

Airplane can't fly near the Pentagon without getting shot down.....uh the Pentagon lies in the approach/departure area of Reagan National. Airplanes fly over it every day, not to mention there was nothing to shoot it down with.

Pentagon has 80 cameras.....no, on that side it had less than ten, the 80 would seem to speak towards another oft-told lie from the truth movement, the 83/4 videos the FBI "seized" that most of, had nothing to do with the Pentagon.

Zero evidence linking the hijackers......other than the flight attendants on board their flights that radioed the names and seat numbers on the airline comm nets....


The sad part, someone who does not know any better is going to read your post and believe it.

a reply to: DarthFazer. Yep, not even getting half the money he needed to rebuild is making a killing....

a reply to: PhyllidaDavenport

BREAKING 9/11 NEWS: FBI Says Barbara Olsen Did Not Call Ted Olsen. Bush Solicitor General LIED !!

Nationally syndicated talk show host Charles Goyette uncovered blockbuster information in his drive-time interview with author David Ray Griffin.


A center piece of the increasingly apparent BULLSH*T story our government and corporate media have fed us for six long years was a complete fabrication!


We were fed a lie by Ted Olsen who served as Solictor General for the Bush Administration, when on 9/11 he held a press conference to tell America and the world that his dead wife had called him before her demise from the jet she was on that had just been hijacked.


Personally, I thought it was odd at the time that a man would decide to hold a press conference minutes after hearing of his own wife’s death, when it happened on 9/11. If my own wife had just died, the last thing I’d want to do would be to talk to anyone, let alone call a press conference. It didn’t “smell” right.


Now we know why it didn’t smell right. It was a lie. The FBI has reported that no such call between Barbara Olsen and Ted Olsen ever took place on 9/11/2001.


It was part of the rapidly unraveling scam that is the official story of 9/11.


In fact, Griffin went on to explain that there is zero evidence that any hijackers had commandeered a plane at all. True Bush believers will say, whao, wait a minute, we all know they did. How do you know? Because Bush told you.


But, as Griffin rightly points out, in this interview, there is no “EVIDENCE” of their existence.

www.opednews.com...

You are correct there was no phone call, even I fell for that one years ago. Your right about one thing, if one part of the OS has been proven a lie, then why should we believe in the rest of it.

a reply to: PhyllidaDavenport


This Always gave me an uneasy feeling. Scripted phone call
"You did great"
youtu.be...

Yes it is certainly in the realm of posibility those planes were flown via remote and the passengers disposed of. If thousands of troops were used as cannon during the illegal invasion of Iraq for resources and imposing democracy then those poor passengers were of no signifigance to the facilitators of 9-11 in the grand scheme of it all. Thats putting it mildly.

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: DarthFazer.

Yep, not even getting half the money he ( Larry Silverstein ) needed to rebuild is making a killing....

source: www.globalresearch.ca...

Within hours of the destruction of the Twin Towers on September 11th, Larry Silverstein was on the phone to his lawyers, trying to determine if his insurance policies could “construe the attacks as two separate, insurable incidents rather than one.” Silverstein spent years in the courts attempting to win $7.1 billion from his $3.55 billion insurance policy and in 2007 walked away with $4.55 billion, the largest single insurance settlement ever. As soon as the deal was announced Silverstein sued United and American Airlines for a further $3.5 billion for their “negligence” in the 9/11 attacks, a claim that was struck down by the courts but is still on appeal.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: AnteBellum

Then Bld 7 was demo'd to cover up something.

www.wtc7.net...

They covered up our knowledge of the 9/11 plus much more IMO.
Littered with Gov agencies and financial agencies.

Pretty sure there was some big investigations involving banks and the SEC at the time as well.

Someone quick, call the paramedics sremmos and I agree on something. I don't have the answers. But so many questions, so many things that just don't fit , not sure about all the truths but I know three things.


The government lies

They have previously discussed false flags to justify other actions (operation northwoods)

A lot of things just do not make too much sense even if you are not a demolition expert and so on.

Nice post op. Crazy country we live in.

a reply to: Reallyfolks

Why does everyone see a T in my name lol!!

Glad we can find some common ground though.

a reply to: DarthFazer

21 ton explosion! Detected from space! And building still stands.

That photo confirms what I have been asserting for years, and that is, if a building is not properly and structurally pre-weakened and explosives are not firmly placed on a structural columns, the result will be what your picture depicts.

Let's take a look at additional cases of what happens when a steel frame building is not properly prepared for explosive demolition.

Photo 1: Despite explosive detonations, building remains standing

Photo 2: Despite massive explosion, building remains standing

Photo 3: Despite detonation of a huge bomb in 1993, WTC1 remains standing

In regard to WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7, it would have been impossible to structurally pre-weaken their steel structures and properly place explosives in a crowded building and not attract a lot of attention because the preparation process for demolition implosion would have taken many months and generate tons of waste debris, create a hazardous and dusty environment and generate a lot of noise.

I know that explosives were not responsible for the destruction of WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 because if explosives were properly placed on the steel structures, the explosion would have generated detail signals down through the stee; structures and into the ground where the signals would have been detected by local seismic monitors, and that did not happen, which is understandable considering that no explosions are heard nor seen as WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 collapsed.

You set explosives on each floor of the WTC buildings and detonate the charges, but what happens is that the blast waves will simply flow around the steel columns like wind flowing around a flag pole, but the blast waves will take out windows and wall, but leave the structure intact.

In Iraq, there were buildings the absorbed multiple JDAM bomb and cruise missile strikes and remained standing. Let's take a look here.

Photo: Building Absorbed Bomb Strike

Perhaps they should take a look here to understand what happened to the Chinese Embassy that absorbed multiple bomb strikes and yet, remained standing.

Photo: Chinese Embassy Bombed, Remains Standing

People who support the 9/11 demo theory do not understand what it takes to bring down steel frame buildings, but they must understand that what they see in Hollywood action movies does not automatically translate into reality.

a reply to: Informer1958 Actually the FBI testified in court that no calls from her cellphone connected, but that someone, most likely Barbara Olson, had used a seatback Airfone to call Ted Olson. There were also affidavits from two people who initially took the calls that said it was Barbara calling. Again, a failure to conduct proper research.

a reply to: cardinalfan0596

4.5 billion


$4,550,000,000 to be exact


But he cant take it to hades with him.

He also tried to sue AA for another billion but it was thrown out www.crainsnewyork.com...

a reply to: seasoul. Yep, over ten billion to rebuild, and he got under five billion, of which, 1.4 billion went to the Port Authority in rent payments so he could.retain the right to rebuild.

a reply to: DarthFazer Which part of $10,000,000,000 is the amount to rebuild, is more than the $4,550,000,000 he got from insurance do you not understand? And after the 1.4 billion he has paid to the port authority, leaves him $6,000,000,000 short of the money needed to rebuild......

Those 5 dancing Israelis;I just don't know what to say. But man, not being facetious, but America got punked to the nth degree.
@ 5:40


wtf

eta because I want to say more but I'm speechless. Like really? wtf? was 911 an episode of the freaking twilight zone?

a reply to: cardinalfan0596

most likely Barbara Olson, had used a seatback Airfone to call Ted Olson.

Most likely? Your "opinion" is not a fact.

Again, a failure to conduct proper research.

I have done my research and "Most likely" does not fit the facts. Nice try.

a reply to: cardinalfan0596

It has been proven repeatedly and again in the video of the OP that airphones were not available on the airlines in question at that time. Cell phone reception was impossible at any altitude over 19000 ft. Actual stewardesses and pilots have confirmed that airphones were not in use

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: jude11. Never forget, ninety percent of the post is untrue.

Airplane can't fly near the Pentagon without getting shot down.....uh the Pentagon lies in the approach/departure area of Reagan National. Airplanes fly over it every day, not to mention there was nothing to shoot it down with.

Pentagon has 80 cameras.....no, on that side it had less than ten, the 80 would seem to speak towards another oft-told lie from the truth movement, the 83/4 videos the FBI "seized" that most of, had nothing to do with the Pentagon.

Zero evidence linking the hijackers......other than the flight attendants on board their flights that radioed the names and seat numbers on the airline comm nets....


The sad part, someone who does not know any better is going to read your post and believe it.

I won't even go into this. I don't have time and your claims are too weak to justify a response.

Sorry.

Jude

a reply to: FlySolo. The photoshopped van makes an appearance on ATS again. It has been a while.

a reply to: skyeagle409

In regard to WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7, it would have been impossible to structurally pre-weaken their steel structures and properly place explosives in a crowded building and not attract a lot of attention because the preparation process for demolition implosion would have taken many months and generate tons of waste debris, create a hazardous and dusty environment and generate a lot of noise.

There were eyewitness that reported that there were different contracting companies doing all kinds of work on the WTC month before 911 happened. Furthermore, no one would pay attention to these people going in and out of the WTC. I am sure everyone of them had some kind of name badges as well.

Also it was reported and complained about by many employees in the WTC, that there was a lot of dust in their offices after cleaning crews had left.

So again your wrong in your assumptions.