9/11 Bombshell: Methodical Deception -- Rebekah Roth

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: jude11

Jude, we are on the same page as far as what really happened to those buildings. I'm just saying I refuse to accept undocumented information from a source I know nothing about and do not have the time or inclination to research her story. I feel I have sufficiently produced enough evidence for me to doubt one portion of her story so I will discount all of it until she is proven to me. You do that and I will gladly listen.

We'll have to agree to disagree I guess.

I am not discounting your claims nor hers.

But to dismiss an entire premise over what may be a terminology error is not very responsible IMO.

And to say that you have produced evidence? Sorry, can't agree with that at all. What is your evidence?

She has produced evidence and attempted to back it up, right or wrong. You have simply disagreed without giving evidence to the contrary.

I know we may be on the same page but to simply deny her entire premise on a single point that you have not supplied evidence to confirm otherwise does more harm than good in the search for truth IMO.

Jude

a reply to: jude11

Let's not brow beat each other over this. We agree that there were evil forces at work on 9/11 and I need no more evidence to prove that truth. It's a sad state we are witness to, isn't it?

a reply to: CharlesT

I tried to enlarge the photos, however I lose the pixels. I cant make out what is on the boxes.

Has anyone else tried, maybe I am not doing correctly.

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: jude11

Let's not brow beat each other over this. We agree that there were evil forces at work on 9/11 and I need no more evidence to prove that truth. It's a sad state we are witness to, isn't it?

Indeed it is my friend.

We need truth and those that possess it are not forthcoming.

It's up to people like you, me and everyone else.

Jude

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: CharlesT

I tried to enlarge the photos, however I lose the pixels. I cant make out what is on the boxes.

Has anyone else tried, maybe I am not doing correctly.

I have also tried but I believe we need someone with access to the DHS, CIA, FBI, DEA, ATF technology.

They have all those toys after 9/11 so they should share right?

Jude

a reply to: Informer1958

Well, that was the point I was making. I don't know if this woman's story is legit or not. I know she is selling a book but I can not or will not even take the time or energy to verify her story. I don't need to. I made up my mind long ago, that the official version was a complete fabrication to cover up 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors" , a false flag to usher in complete control and subjugation of the masses. It's all obvious at this point. As I have said numerous times, the Constitution is dead, long live the regime.

After listening to the full video interview, I'm wondering if there was any earthworks/construction going on in, or near the AF Base where they say the planes may have been taken to at that time?

Maybe the guy who said they were locked out for two-three days may know.

Finding 'passengers' in a mass grave there would open up some can-o-worms?

Long time now, but ATS members nearby ..... take the dog for a walk around the area?

a reply to: jude11

Forgot to Star and Flag OP. Pardon me!

a reply to: jude11

I have also tried but I believe we need someone with access to the DHS, CIA, FBI, DEA, ATF technology.

They have all those toys after 9/11 so they should share right?

Jude

I agree

I bet if these photos were used to go to court they would be able to make them bigger.

a reply to: CharlesT

I don't need to. I made up my mind long ago, that the official version was a complete fabrication to cover up 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors" , a false flag to usher in complete control and subjugation of the masses. It's all obvious at this point. As I have said numerous times, the Constitution is dead, long live the regime.

I agree one hundred %.

I came to the same conclusion after years of research.

Interesting so far, This is a first for me also..

Listening to second video now.

Thanks for posting this Jude.

Here's a little reading material for later..

www.antiwar.com...

a reply to: jude11

In 2003 Halliburton got a military escort into Iraq to secure all the oil fields - fact.

Now I'm thinking that Texas attorney Harry Whittington took Cheney to task on his involvement in bringing 911 to fruition and that's when Cheney shot him in the face "accidentally" - thinking Harry was a "quail"

Thanks J - another fantastic contribution shedding light on the mass deception that is the "official story"

International criminal court time.

Here is the art?



The caption for the pic is explained in the link below, filled with drawings, articles and pictures of the fuse blocks.

As far as "fuse blocks", these aren't explosive demolition train components, but electronic fuse blocks used in wiring for electronic components. And even if they were used, the little access they were given to that specific area around one window isn't going to mean they strung wires and "gelatin" charges throughout the building, if thats why they are suggesting. The cardboard is for screening for their project to open a window, build a platform, lean out and snap a photo of it.

Hiding their activity to place a "beacon" of some sort is even more ridiculous. At 500 miles per hour, it was hard enough and simple enough to broadside the whole building in a jetliner.

Trying to hit a specific floor would be impossible at that speed, as an amateur pilot, under those circumstances. Hitting the building near center, hi enough would be (was) sufficient. How could he miss?

Even if some beacon was used, merely placing a suitcase somewhere in the building on the morning of 911 would have also accomplished that. For what end, though?

Lets see… hoax.

But yah, the Israel government has influenced the US government to go to war in the Middle East on their behalf and duyah, we been at endless war err since the towers fell. For all the lying and unjust reasons everyone is already aware of.

Conspiracy Cafe

a reply to: AnteBellum

Bld 7 was absolutely demolished and being an architect that works in NYC I have talked with hundreds of trade professionals in great length about this for 10 years now.
The consensus is without a shadow of a doubt. Even demo experts have explained to me how it could of been done in the time allotted with a crew of 4-6.

You are an architect ....????

So explain just when did they do this demo job on WTC 7 ...??

Building was hit and set on fire by impact of WTC 1 at 10:30. WTC 7 collapsed at 5:20, less that 7 hours

In mean time FDNY crews were inside building from 11 Am to sometime before 1 PM - searching building for
stragglers and assessing damage

So only 4 hours for supposed crews to enter and rig a 47 floor skyscraper - largest building demolished with
explosives was 33 story (31 above ground, 2 below). Even then took 3 months to prep building and another
3 1/2 weeks to rig explosives

All this in a building with fires spreading from floor to floor - odd of being trapped are very high which is why FDNY abandoned it

If you are an architect would realize this is BS ........

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: Informer1958

Check it out for yourself.

www.littelfuse.com...

Even if they had been fuse holders, would anyone with common sense fuse an explosive charge thereby creating a possible point of failure to detonate? Don't think so!

I think you might be right. I believe these are what you would call buss bars or "Buss" It's a system for multi circuit wiring as per floor by floor possibly. (see photo below) Typically you would see these is office settings where there are multi cubicles that would be powered. These might also be old pics of electrical workers rewiring the floors that was destroyed in the 1975 fire.

originally posted by: intrptr
Here is the art?

The caption for the pic is explained in the link below, filled with drawings, articles and pictures of the fuse blocks.

As far as "fuse blocks", these aren't explosive demolition train components, but electronic fuse blocks used in wiring for electronic components. And even if they were used, the little access they were given to that specific area around one window isn't going to mean they strung wires and "gelatin" charges throughout the building, if thats why they are suggesting. The cardboard is for screening for their project to open a window, build a platform, lean out and snap a photo of it.

Hiding their activity to place a "beacon" of some sort is even more ridiculous. At 500 miles per hour, it was hard enough and simple enough to broadside the whole building in a jetliner.

Trying to hit a specific floor would be impossible at that speed, as an amateur pilot, under those circumstances. Hitting the building near center, hi enough would be (was) sufficient. How could he miss?

Even if some beacon was used, merely placing a suitcase somewhere in the building on the morning of 911 would have also accomplished that. For what end, though?

Lets see… hoax.

But yah, the Israel government has influenced the US government to go to war in the Middle East on their behalf and duyah, we been at endless war err since the towers fell. For all the lying and unjust reasons everyone is already aware of.

Conspiracy Cafe

THis link here says it all..

Click on the link above posted by intrpr.... it has all the pics you will ever need..

a reply to: proob4

These might also be old pics of electrical workers rewiring the floors that was destroyed in the 1975 fire.

Wow, Now that is very possible.

a reply to: jude11

Remote controlled planes? Demos? Falling buildings that didnt get hit? Put options on united and AA?

a reply to: proob4

Electronic Fuses aren't employed in explosive demolition firing trains, if thats what is being suggested.

They use shock tube between charges, not wires and "fuse blocks".

spent shock tube

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: proob4

These might also be old pics of electrical workers rewiring the floors that was destroyed in the 1975 fire.

Wow, Now that is very possible.

No, it's not..

see the link above in intrpr's post...