UFO nearly misses plane, incident recorded from plane 09/07/15 Netherlands

a reply to: Gideon70

How the hell can you say it looks like a bird

Because to me it looks like a bird.

a reply to: gortex

Because to me it looks like a bird.

What kind of bird?

Hi
Regarding the report on the Ryanair flight and missed ufo, I have a few points. Firstly, the article is clearly there, but it appears very small as it passes beneath the wing. Due to speed the shape is distorted. It follows the rapid movement of air below the wing, so is being dragged as opposed to flying under the wing intelligently. This lends credence to it being a bird (luckily avoiding engine intake!). Next, if you look at a Google map of Eindhoven airport you'll see that just south west of the airport (within a mile i think )is where this footage is filmed, with the distinctively straight edged woods and funny shaped lake. So we can pin point where this footage is from. The aircraft is climbing, so either just departed or lifting from a go around. If you study the Jeppsen aeronautical charts for Eindhoven

Click here for pdf

you will see that one of the standard departure routes from Eindhoven would entail taking off and taking a right turn northwards, which is what this aircraft is doing lost taking off. And finally, the same charts mention noise abatement and the requirements to ascend to 1000ft before noise isn't an issue, which would probably explain the use of more thrust to aid the aircraft in climbing to the 5000ft required as it departs. All in all, this looks like a bird that missed the engine, there appears to be no strange movement of the aircraft or its flight plan and is probably not a flying saucer o drone. But, I suppose, until it is identified, it stills fills the criteria for ufo...

It was Will Smith shooting Hancock 2.

a reply to: Lucidparadox

Taranis?

Why are ufo's always fuzzy and ghostly looking?

[SNIP]

Except it appears turned around and passed the jet going forward. Just next to the fuselage in front of the wing you can see it shoot back past.


ETA: Regardless of banking the airframe was still moving at least 100 knots and no bird could overtake a jet even in a bank. Maybe a tiny plane with a tight enough turn radius, but not this large passenger plane or whatever it is.

originally posted by: weemadmental
a reply to: Lucidparadox

Taranis?

Now that is the best explanation I've seen thus far. Could be.. i wonder if test flight logs are public (probably not)

Nor would they want to own up to something like this. It would explain the no comment from the airline.

Here is a link to an theoretical animation done by lions ground news (no idea who they are or if I yet agree/disagree with their theory). Approx. 1:30 into the clip, for those who are not grasping the " object" moving from the rear to the front of the plane.

youtu.be...

Still not sure what this is. Leaning far away from it being a bird though (unless it is Larry Bird, then yes, I always knew Larry Legend had super powers)


But most logical scenario in my book......Hoax (unfortunately I do not have the technical chops to definitively prove that)
a reply to: RogueWave

originally posted by: Paddyofurniture
Here is a link to an theoretical animation done by lions ground news (no idea who they are or if I yet agree/disagree with their theory). Approx. 1:30 into the clip, for those who are not grasping the " object" moving from the rear to the front of the plane.

youtu.be...

Still not sure what this is. Leaning far away from it being a bird though (unless it is Larry Bird, then yes, I always knew Larry Legend had super powers)


But most logical scenario in my book......Hoax (unfortunately I do not have the technical chops to definitively prove that)
a reply to: RogueWave

EXCELLENT POST!

This details the reality of the situation and with more information from other witnesses and the article.

The Stewardess even said it was an odd occurrence and there is multiple witnesses now.

This is picking up some steam.

To reiterate I have no solid research into the' Lions Ground News ' . A quick look at their YouTube page doesn't instill the utmost confidence that they are strictly a fact based investigative group, with the best interest of quality knowledge seeking in the UFO/UAP phenomena field.
Apologies to the OP. This video was in your 2nd link but in wading through the pages I saw not direct reference to it and thought it would contribute.
a reply to: Lucidparadox

Kind of looked like an SR-71.

a reply to: Jubei42

Hey, OP said the airline and pilot REFUSED to comment. Perhaps that's inaccurate, but either way, not 'responding' doesn't make sense to me from a PR point of view either.

It screams fake, listen to it, you can 'hear' it as it passes the plane, a whooshing sound.
Yeah, the more I watch, the more I think I think its fake

originally posted by: Lucidparadox

originally posted by: weemadmental
a reply to: Lucidparadox

Taranis?

Now that is the best explanation I've seen thus far. Could be.. i wonder if test flight logs are public (probably not)

Nor would they want to own up to something like this. It would explain the no comment from the airline.

So , how big was Taranis again ?

The object is extremely dark... Unnaturally dark. As if it absorbs light. Very strange.

a reply to: gortex

12 ft long

Which this object totally could be depending on the distance away from the plane

a reply to: SlowNail

Perhaps that's inaccurate, but either way, not 'responding' doesn't make sense to me from a PR point of view either.

You see to assume that anyone was actually asked anything.

a reply to: Lucidparadox

The Stewardess even said it was an odd occurrence and there is multiple witnesses now.

According to whom?

a reply to: Paddyofurniture

But most logical scenario in my book......Hoax (unfortunately I do not have the technical chops to definitively prove that)

Could be a hoax. All I know is that it isn't a bird.