It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
Op, I have to commend you on your video outline. I wish we would all do this when posting videos. Some of us don't have the time to view a long video. Sometimes we start watching a video and when we're half way into it realize most of the information we've already read or heard about before hand. s&f
I'm going to watch the video later, sounds very interesting. I do have one question though, what exactly is psionics?
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
Well, for one, given all the UFO sightings, crop circles, animal mutilations, and human abductions, reported from all around
the world, from thousands to hundreds of thousands of cases, reported for decades and even far back in antiquity
For example, Randy says the majority of ET's are here for trade. Is that so far-fetched?
I posted the video at 1:47pm and you posted at 2:16pm, amazing that you watched a 90 minute video in 27 mins!
Well, for one, given all the UFO sightings, crop circles, animal mutilations, and human abductions, reported from all around the world, from thousands to hundreds of thousands of cases, reported for decades and even far back in antiquity, it doesn't take a genius to realize there is some kind of ET interaction with Earth. So we have that. This video just helps to answer the who, what, how and why.
For example, Randy says the majority of ET's are here for trade. Is that so far-fetched?
How about the trillions missing from the Pentagon? That is factual. This would go a long way in explaining where it went.
Let me ask you a question. I understand you may need more evidence before accepting ET's are interacting with Earth. Okay. But can you admit it is a possibility? If you can, then what is so far-fetched about this?
If you can't admit the possibility, then you are closed minded and there is no point in having a conversation about it.
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
Just a lot of talk.
The video was a group of gullible people in conference with a storyteller.
Also, some of what he says is provably false, which could indicate that he is mistaken, but more likely that it is BS.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
Just a lot of talk.
The video was a group of gullible people in conference with a storyteller.
Also, some of what he says is provably false, which could indicate that he is mistaken, but more likely that it is BS.
I don't know. Are the gullible the ones who are open to such revelations? Or are the gullible the ones the believe everything the MSM, government and corporate science tell them, and believe that if these "institutions" haven't mentioned something that it cannot be true?
Provably false - okay - feel free to prove anything you feel is such.
originally posted by: Thill
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
Well, for one, given all the UFO sightings, crop circles, animal mutilations, and human abductions, reported from all around
the world, from thousands to hundreds of thousands of cases, reported for decades and even far back in antiquity
For example, Randy says the majority of ET's are here for trade. Is that so far-fetched?
So umm the proof of ET trade are abductions and mutilations ? ... Would You please elaborate how that works ?
I am a very open minded person, more a believer than a skeptic, but I like to use logic to help me find the truth..
For someone who thinks its "fantasy" you sure have researched it quite a bit.
How do you know the name of his boss?
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
Just a lot of talk.
The video was a group of gullible people in conference with a storyteller.
Also, some of what he says is provably false, which could indicate that he is mistaken, but more likely that it is BS.
He's supposed to be genetically engineered to 'handle' seeing an alien without fear. Well, we have mapped the human genome now. Which gene does that? And he seems to think that human genetic engineering was doable well before the technology and the genome map existed.
Why would a genetically engineered super-soldier require corrective lenses?
I would imagine that someone who defended our human territory in space (where are the boundaries and legal limits defined?) would have to know about, at least, propulsion, communications and life support systems in depth. Yet everything he has said was extremely light on technical detail.
Where were the insignia's and dress uniform, the indicators of authority and rank?
Well, if his superior is Brigadier General Julian Smythe, and he is part of some super secret black program, his identity would be pretty much erased, wouldn't it? Maybe that is not even the Brigadier's real name.
Do people ever use fake names in top secret programs? Do people's identities and records get tampered with or even erased in black programs?
originally posted by: alldaylong
Something such as this thread could only come from America.
Gave me a good laugh anyway.
originally posted by: yuppa
OP...ASTR0 MADE MORE SENSE than this guy who is claiming to be genetically engineered super baby.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
Just a lot of talk.
The video was a group of gullible people in conference with a storyteller.
Also, some of what he says is provably false, which could indicate that he is mistaken, but more likely that it is BS.
He's supposed to be genetically engineered to 'handle' seeing an alien without fear. Well, we have mapped the human genome now. Which gene does that? And he seems to think that human genetic engineering was doable well before the technology and the genome map existed.
Why would a genetically engineered super-soldier require corrective lenses?
I would imagine that someone who defended our human territory in space (where are the boundaries and legal limits defined?) would have to know about, at least, propulsion, communications and life support systems in depth. Yet everything he has said was extremely light on technical detail.
Where were the insignia's and dress uniform, the indicators of authority and rank?
Okay, good points, these are the kinds of things we should be discussing instead of childish "name-calling", and I don't mean you who wrote this post.
As for genetic engineering, weren't the Nazis already quite advanced in this during WWII? Isn't it plausible US scientists advanced that research by the 1960's? I don't think we can assume that just because certain scientific or technical or spiritual etc info has not filtered down to the public that it does not exist or isn't true.
As for seeing an alien and not experiencing fear or little fear, it is easy to pinpoint which areas of the brain produce certain emotions and reactions, such as anxiety, find the gene/genes responsible for the growth of that area of the brain and modulate or change the genes expression. That kind of gene modulation has been done with plants and animals.
As for requiring corrective lenses - well, I don't think they said they made the perfect human, just enhanced certain abilities useful in a soldier such as repressing fear, physical and stamina enhancements, maybe coordination - but that doesn't mean one will be perfect in every way.
About knowing about propulsion, communication, life-support - most of us have flown in planes, and unless we are experts in the field, amateurs or hobbyists, how many of us know about a planes communication system, life support system, even the workings of a jet engine? Unless specialists most of us are the same, have a general idea but that is it.
And he wasn't any kind of tech expert, he calls himself "the muscle", a grunt.