It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: humanityrising
I like what Sanders has to say on many subjects, but not all of them. He seems sincere, just like Ron Paul always did, and though the two are polar opposites it feels like they at least both actually have the public's interest in mind. He also wants a FED audit, something Trump wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole and possibly the most important issue at hand in this country. I will be voting for Bernie if I get the chance. However at this point I wouldn't be even slightly surprised if Bernie got elected and then immediately sold us all down the river, because that how things work in this country.
originally posted by: asmall89
originally posted by: humanityrising
I like what Sanders has to say on many subjects, but not all of them. He seems sincere, just like Ron Paul always did, and though the two are polar opposites it feels like they at least both actually have the public's interest in mind. He also wants a FED audit, something Trump wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole and possibly the most important issue at hand in this country. I will be voting for Bernie if I get the chance. However at this point I wouldn't be even slightly surprised if Bernie got elected and then immediately sold us all down the river, because that how things work in this country.
If Bernie really wanted to audit the fed he wouldn't have back stabbed Ron and sided with Frank and Dodd on the audit the fed bill. Auditing the Fed is nor high on Sanders or Trump's list of things to do. If at all.
“The new language of the Sanders Amendment requires a one-time disclosure from the Fed of 13(3) facilities, foreign currency swaps and mortgage-backed securities,” Paul explained. “Basically, their sins of the past would be revealed and Americans would know more about who got bailed out by the Fed and under what terms. This would be good, but it’s not nearly enough.”
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: peppycat
Plus on the Celebrity Apprentice, i'd say 97.5% of the time he played fair and fired the right person.
What was that other 2.5% of the time?
I don't care how he did on a freaking TV show, that is not relevant to being the leader of the free world.
And ya you can tell that he is winging his speeches, I bet that will work so well in foreign negotiations.
originally posted by: peskyhumans
Donald Trump is a liberal and a Clinton patsy. His only purpose in the elections is to rig them so no honest conservatives can win the election.
Trump on the issues
He has flip-flopped on almost every critical issue when he started running for president. He used to be Pro-Choice, now suddenly he's Pro-Life. He used to support an assault weapons ban, now he wants a fully protected 2nd amendment. He used to be pro universal healthcare, now he's anti-Obamacare. In 2001 he was affiliated with the Democrat party.
Trump donates to Clinton Foundation
Both Donald Trump and his son have spent years donating funds to the Clinton Foundation. They donated in 2002, 2005, 2006, and 2007 contributing over $100,000 in total.
Clintons attend Trump's wedding
The fact is, the Clinton family and the Trump family are close friends. You can even see how close they are, in the picture in that article where the Clintons attended Trump's wedding.
I am going to state this clearly so everyone here can understand:
Donald Trump is a liberal patsy.
A vote for Donald Trump is a vote for the continuance of the establishment, the same establishment that put Bush Senior, Bill Clinton, George Bush, and Obama into place. An election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump cements a member of the chosen elite into place, who will continue with the same agendas that the previous presidents have been a willful part of.
Please vote for someone non-mainstream. Ben Carson would be a great choice. He's not a politician - he is an intelligent, honest to goodness patriot. A vote for him would be a vote for real change. Not the same elite agendas that have been rammed down our throats for the past several decades.
Seriously!
If this guy would want to get half of what he said done for sure he would have to use E.O.s, or have one hell of a supportive congress.