Hillary To Bernie & Joe: 'I Already Have The Delegates For Nomination!'

originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: intrepid

It's for that reason I'm almost hoping Trump gets elected without an official party nomination. It would set a new precedence that others could follow. It also might carry the potential to destroy the stranglehold our two party system has.

I will be joining my Canadian friends as a resident, just 20 minutes away, if Trump is elected.

a reply to: reldra

It really wasn't my intention to change the topic to Trump. I just wanted to make the point that an end to to this two party crap we perpetually suffer through needs to come to an end. I don't care how it happens even if it means suffering under Trump for four years. I just care that it happens.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: intrepid

It's for that reason I'm almost hoping Trump gets elected without an official party nomination. It would set a new precedence that others could follow. It also might carry the potential to destroy the stranglehold our two party system has.

I will be joining my Canadian friends as a resident, just 20 minutes away, if Trump is elected.

We've got an election in Oct. If Harper gets back with a majority you may want to rethink that.

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: IAMTAT

If Hillary gets the nomination, one thing is certain - the US is not a Constitutional Republic by any means but is almost the dictionary definition of a dynastic oligarchy.

and at that point would be the appropriate time to action the 2nd amendment, and take America back.

But - iphone, X-factor, Kardashian-factor and the 50% off sale at the Mall will ensure that never happens.

Nero fiddled whilst Rome burned.

Would be the same if Jeb Bush gets it- worse.

And this is more the problem:

"Oh yeah? My side may be corrupt, but so is yours and worse!"

Look - Corruption is corruption. Just because one person is democrat doesn't make their corruption somehow "less corrupt" than the republican corruption. It's bad no matter who does it and shouldn't be tolerated.

No, it would be the THIRD bush. In regard to Clintons, it would be the second. I didn;t mean what you said.

Of course she has the votes.

So does Bush.

That is what is so fun about this cycle.

originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: beezzer

"Sides, sides, everywhere a side. Break my interest and killing my mind...."

Sides are the problem. People have to "WIN". While the sides keep winning and losing the people continually lose. I've voted Liberal, NDP(although when I was young) and Conservative. I HATE the leader of my party. I LOVE my Conservitive MP. I think he should be running the party. Here's where you guys have it better. If I vote for my MP that's a vote for my PM(I don't want that). You guys separate the leader from the party. We can't.

Voting for the most honest, most moral, most ethical person has become a thing of the past.

We'll never see it again.

The people are too divided.

Jesus could come back today, walk on water, and;

One third of people would scoff because He couldn't swim
One third of people would lock him up for providing for the poor
And one third would lock him up for domestic terrorism because He believed in personal freedoms.


Basically, we've "devolved" into a pissing contest on who will be our next despot.

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: intrepid

It's for that reason I'm almost hoping Trump gets elected without an official party nomination. It would set a new precedence that others could follow. It also might carry the potential to destroy the stranglehold our two party system has.

I will be joining my Canadian friends as a resident, just 20 minutes away, if Trump is elected.

We've got an election in Oct. If Harper gets back with a majority you may want to rethink that.

Well, I will have to go somewhere. I don't know much about Harper, but I imagine he knows where all the countries are and who the leaders are and is versed in government in general. Trump is a businessman that says many things that are not possible and/or incorrect as to what he could or would do as President. He might be slightly more intelligent than Palin.

originally posted by: beezzer
Basically, we've "devolved" into a pissing contest on who will be our next despot.

That should be in everyone's siggy. So damn true....and sad.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

Clinton Camp Says One-Fifth of Delegates Secured for Nomination

Lies Lies Lies!!!
There is no F-ing way she has One-Fifth of the Delegates!!! NO F-ing WAY!!!
With all the negativity about her emails and so on etc.... the shiz that people say about her.... no f-ing way... The witch is a big fat f-ing liar.....

It's war if she becomes president....

I do wonder if this is also a novel excuse by Hillary to avoid any democrat candidate debates where embarrassing questions and challenges to her might surely arise:
'I don't have to debate---I already won.'

originally posted by: IAMTAT
I do wonder if this is also a novel excuse by Hillary to avoid any democrat candidate debates where embarrassing questions and challenges to her might surely arise:
'I don't have to debate---I already won.'

Good point, because
several pollsters have pointed out
that every time she opens her mouth
her poll numbers go down.

If she shuts up and says nothing,
then her poll numbers start rising.

A debate would be like death to
her campaign.

a reply to: IAMTAT
Well she could just go the Turmp route and insult the prompter when the tough question is asked.
And then go off on some rant that has nothing to do with the question.

This could also be a way of artfully suspending her campaign, by declaring herself the winner, turning over the chess board, taking her ball...stomping out of the playground and going home until the general election....ALL just before the real email/server crap hits the fan.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: IAMTAT
Well she could just go the Turmp route and insult the prompter when the tough question is asked.
And then go off on some rant that has nothing to do with the question.

Maybe...but she's really more of the 'Did I wipe the server?----What, with a cloth or something?'---kind of question dodger.

@imtat

I think you're right. She's not very smart, has no experience, has no way to identify with her base and will get evicerated on her failures. If I were her I wouldn't debate at all.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: IAMTAT
If this is actually true...
Does anyone think Bernie Sanders should run third party?

Yes, he should. He should have the balls to do what Paul never did.

But wouldn't a Sanders' third-party run, effectively divide the Democrat vote?

But if Trump ran as a 3rd party along with Sanders, this could be a VERY interesting election.

LIER, LIER, PANTS ON FIRE!! HRC!

Did I miss the 2016 Primaries?

Did I miss the 2016 Democratic Convention?

Wow, I knew I was tired but that's a lot of missing time ...

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: IAMTAT

If Hillary gets the nomination, one thing is certain - the US is not a Constitutional Republic by any means but is almost the dictionary definition of a dynastic oligarchy.

This has nothing to do with our constitutional republic and everything to do with the Democratic Party's nomination procedures.

a reply to: Teikiatsu

Or the GOP's...

Don't forget Jeb, shoot that is a even more literal definition since it would be the third.

Usually takes more then 2 for a dynasty, but agree with the notion of a Clinton dynasty with hill dog.