You hear it all the time, but trust me it is right around the corner.

Some of us have had enough experiences with "high strangness" that disclosure happened long, long ago.

I don't need authorities to tell me what I already know.....

a reply to: LionOfGOD

I know they are real, I've seen one.

Crickets…

Musing about how many people believe what the government tells them. And about aliens? They would get laughed off the podium.

But lets say they show up at a press conference, people would be grabbing at them for interviews, some artifact, their clothing, their skin, their head.

All of a sudden the government has lost its power, the paradigm is shifted.

How stupid is that? Even if they knew they wouldn't tell. Rocks the boat too much.

a reply to: iksmodnad

I don't get it. Why anyone would set themselves up by playing right
into the hands of the jackasses, that are perpetuating this mountain
of lies and obviously, bogus religion. How sad for people who find
hope in some slippery looking, bug eyed, big headed, ugly ass probing,
skinny snot green, little horror show. Who deviantly plays these, now you
see me, now you don't, little mind #### games? Who does that? Only that
which has the power to so. Which pretty much covers anything
paranormal that's who. Everything with these paranormal parameters
is DEMONIC.

Just say'n

a reply to: iksmodnad

Disclosure will come someday but it won't be a pre-scripted event. It will either usher in a new age for humanity or end it.
Information accrued by our governments has left them with no alternative but to bury it and for good reason. AI is the only wild card I see in this game now.

Anyway the world is gearing up for war right now, worst I've seen in decades. East vs West, haves vs have nots, democry, socialism, racism, sexism, religious wars of all kind, economic failure imminent. Just name it and opposing groups are fighting about it. There is nothing but conflict at the moment and it's about to get a whole lot worse.

Instead of a tin foil hat, I'm wearing a lead one for the time being.

originally posted by: PheonixReborn
Please tell me this is not Greer you are citing .

Sounds very "Greery."

a reply to: randyvs

Without trying to cause anything heated, I have to ask; Why so narrow minded? There's good and bad everywhere, I don't understand how you can put everything under one umbrella and label it all 'demonic' without ever actually meeting or possessing grand amounts of knowledge of everything you put under said umbrella.

a reply to: grey580

Is that to say you think the similarities discredit this thread? Or that this thread corroborates Astr0's story? True or not, I loved Astr0's thread and would really like to hear more from this one.

originally posted by: iksmodnad
I said what I said and I stand by it, this forum is teeming with disinfo agents, but I stand by what I say, it is what it is and I offer no proof just my word, so it is what is.

You do realize that this one statement contradicts everything else you've written, right?
Why would a government need "disinfo agents" if they have been working on "soft disclosure" since the 90's?

Why would they be wasting time, money and effort in convincing a bunch of conspiracy theorists that none of it is true, if they're actively trying to soften up the world for full disclosure?

You can't have it both ways, either they want to tell us this supposed "truth" or they want to debunk you all with their "disinfo agents". So, which is it?

originally posted by: Rocker2013

originally posted by: iksmodnad
I said what I said and I stand by it, this forum is teeming with disinfo agents, but I stand by what I say, it is what it is and I offer no proof just my word, so it is what is.

You do realize that this one statement contradicts everything else you've written, right?
Why would a government need "disinfo agents" if they have been working on "soft disclosure" since the 90's?

Why would they be wasting time, money and effort in convincing a bunch of conspiracy theorists that none of it is true, if they're actively trying to soften up the world for full disclosure?

You can't have it both ways, either they want to tell us this supposed "truth" or they want to debunk you all with their "disinfo agents". So, which is it?

Gotta use up that budget so Congress doesn't appropriate less money next year!

When the aliens come they are going to make us into wallets. =|

originally posted by: Rocker2013


You do realize that this one statement contradicts everything else you've written, right?
Why would a government need "disinfo agents" if they have been working on "soft disclosure" since the 90's?

Why would they be wasting time, money and effort in convincing a bunch of conspiracy theorists that none of it is true, if they're actively trying to soften up the world for full disclosure?

You can't have it both ways, either they want to tell us this supposed "truth" or they want to debunk you all with their "disinfo agents". So, which is it?

lolz maybe disinfo follows the aim not to disclose that fast because the aliens dont want to. or the disinfo agents are just from other organisations who try to prevent et disclosure at any cost.

Dear thread opener,
good you stay positive but i fear one day you might get very disappointed.. or insane :-)

I'm guessing this is someone in camp Greer...

a reply to: AnteBellum

Huh. Sounds like we are being kept in a perpetual state of unresolvable fear and kept mentally off balance as well.

a reply to: iksmodnad

2 pages of replies and nothing from you OP?

I thought we were to TRUST YOU....

You mean that is it, just your opening post and nothing more? Like a name....ANY name.....Proof, or even an IDEA of why you believe this will happen?

How about give us something...Your loyal trustees are awaiting....

a reply to: Chrisfishenstein

"It is what it is..."

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Chrisfishenstein

"It is what it is..."

I know exactly what it is too...

Something stinks...

a reply to: Libertatem

Why so narrow minded?

Air conditioning's running great here.
Is it not " Narrow minded " to judge a person " narrow minded "
By the content of one post?

a reply to: KawRider9

Why wouldn't they? Perhaps there is a code in the universe that we do not yet understand, that higher beings cannot interfere with other worlds evolutions

originally posted by: Macenroe82
a reply to: KawRider9

Why wouldn't they? Perhaps there is a code in the universe that we do not yet understand, that higher beings cannot interfere with other worlds evolutions

Yep....I knew it was the intergalactic code!

If they can't interfere how will we EVER get disclosure??

Now I am sad....No Aliens.....

a reply to: iksmodnad

Assume your right. So many new debates, arguments, science, religion changes. Etc.

Assume your wrong. Same as always

Wouldn't trust the government with a wet dream so don't think.it matters

a reply to: Reallyfolks

Wouldn't trust the government with a wet dream so don't think.it matters

Is this possible?

I would like to donate one and try.....