Peer Reviewed Scientific Evidence Exposes Chemtrail as Crime Against Humanity

originally posted by: Bilk22
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

Nah, YT isn't really necessary. These are the chemtrails I saw with my own eyes.

This is a picture I took around the house.


I believe it's a contrail.

Could you explain why yours are chemtrails and mine are not?

a reply to: Bilk22

These are the chemtrails I saw with my own eyes.

We all see them. Calling them "chemtrails" does not make them so, any more than calling your arguments logical.

originally posted by: Bilk22
Nah, YT isn't really necessary. These are the chemtrails I saw with my own eyes.

What type of plane made those contrails, what callsign did they have, where were they flying to and from and what flight number did they all have.

You did check, didn't you? Or you just posted crap!

As expected, you did not bother to check, so they are just contrails, as expected!

a reply to: network dude

Prove yours are contrails.

a reply to: soulpowertothendegree

Not "peer reviewed" at all.
In order to be considered to be "peer reviewed" you need to actually have it reviewed by your peers in a field, not by random wannabe "scientists" who consider time travel, alien abduction and the Lizard Man of Staten Island to be valid proven scientific realities.

originally posted by: Bilk22
a reply to: network dude

Prove yours are contrails.

I am afraid it doesn't work like that.

Here is an example:


Prove to me this isn't a mountain lion.

You can't.

But you can post pictures of known mountain lions to compare.

In the history of aviation science, we have lots of pictures of contrails. We have the scientific explanation of how they form and why they exist. So knowing all that, how is it even remotely logical to look at something that has been explained and accepted for almost 100 years and call it something else?

I would love to hear your thoughts on this process.


ETA:
Here is one better,


This is a picture of a plane leaving a chemtrail. Notice how it's vastly different than the ones you posted?

a reply to: network dude

Oh it certainly does work like that. You cannot testify to the fact that your pic is of contrails. Not in any court and so not here on ATS either.

As to your "authority claim" - you bow to the government and science - they have both lied before. The Tuskegee Experiment is the perfect example of them both lying. They both still lie - at various times and for various reasons.

a reply to: Bilk22

Oh it certainly does work like that. You cannot testify to the fact that your pic is of contrails. Not in any court and so not here on ATS either.

Not even going to argue that now. Let's say it's true for the moment. Then how in the hell can you claim it's a "chemtrail"? Seriously, think about what you just said.

The evidence for contrails pisses all over the "chemtrail" theory.

originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
a reply to: Bilk22

Oh it certainly does work like that. You cannot testify to the fact that your pic is of contrails. Not in any court and so not here on ATS either.

Not even going to argue that now. Let's say it's true for the moment. Then how in the hell can you claim it's a "chemtrail"? Seriously, think about what you just said.

The evidence for contrails pisses all over the "chemtrail" theory.

As to your "authority claim" - you bow to the government and science - they have both lied before. The Tuskegee Experiment is the perfect example of them both lying. They both still lie - at various times and for various reasons.

a reply to: Bilk22
Fine. Keep playing games. Anyone reading this with any intelligence whatsoever can see what you're up to.

a reply to: Bilk22

As to your "authority claim" - you bow to the government and science - they have both lied before.

Yes they have, but again how does that prove chemtrails are real?

They both still lie - at various times and for various reasons.

So because of that chemtrails are real...guess you can't argue with that logic...oh wait you can.

a reply to: network dude

Something very strange has been going on in my neck of the woods lately, I have not seen any for over 2 weeks, so if these things are just everyday normal occurrences with simple atmospheric conditions and normal planes, where did they disappear to? Planes are still flying all around me and I have not seen a single chemtrail behind any of them and yet the atmospheric conditions and weather patterns are exactly the same as they were 2 weeks ago and beyond when I was seeing them everywhere for days and days.

Okay, peer reviewed or not explain to me why they do not happen every day all day long everywhere all the time?

a reply to: DenyObfuscation

Something very strange has been going on in my neck of the woods lately, I have not seen any for over 2 weeks, so if these things are just everyday normal occurrences with simple atmospheric conditions and normal planes, where did they disappear to? Planes are still flying all around me and I have not seen a single chemtrail behind any of them and yet the atmospheric conditions and weather patterns are exactly the same as they were 2 weeks ago and beyond when I was seeing them everywhere for days and days.

1. Obfuscation-make something obscure: to make something obscure or unclear, especially by making it unnecessarily complicated
2. confuse: to make somebody confused

Please, tell me how you are denying obfuscation? Seems to be you are embracing it.

originally posted by: soulpowertothendegree
a reply to: soulpowertothendegree

I see, you all have replied so quickly I find it hard to believe that you have done as I instructed, I am not surprised by this fact. As I postulated in another thread the arrogance of humans, once again I have been proven correct.

It was my hope that some maturity would ensue and the information would be assimilated first before lashing out and trying to destroy it with the same old rhetoric trolling tactics.

Many people have read this paper a month or more ago, and there has already been much examination of its inadequacies - eg here.

You are wrong to assume that because people have replied quickly they must necessarily not have read or understood it.

originally posted by: Bilk22

originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
a reply to: Bilk22

Oh it certainly does work like that. You cannot testify to the fact that your pic is of contrails. Not in any court and so not here on ATS either.

Not even going to argue that now. Let's say it's true for the moment. Then how in the hell can you claim it's a "chemtrail"? Seriously, think about what you just said.

The evidence for contrails pisses all over the "chemtrail" theory.

As to your "authority claim" - you bow to the government and science - they have both lied before. The Tuskegee Experiment is the perfect example of them both lying. They both still lie - at various times and for various reasons.

sure - but there is no actual evidence they are lying about "chemtrails".

Plus you should apply that standard consistently - "Ordinary people" lie all the time too....so why believe them about this??

originally posted by: soulpowertothendegree
a reply to: DenyObfuscation

Something very strange has been going on in my neck of the woods lately, I have not seen any for over 2 weeks, so if these things are just everyday normal occurrences with simple atmospheric conditions and normal planes, where did they disappear to? Planes are still flying all around me and I have not seen a single chemtrail behind any of them and yet the atmospheric conditions and weather patterns are exactly the same as they were 2 weeks ago and beyond when I was seeing them everywhere for days and days.

1. Obfuscation-make something obscure: to make something obscure or unclear, especially by making it unnecessarily complicated
2. confuse: to make somebody confused

Please, tell me how you are denying obfuscation? Seems to be you are embracing it.

To answer your question it must be clear. Why does it seem to you I'm embracing obfuscation? If you can give an example I'll try to simplify it for you.

originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
a reply to: Bilk22
Fine. Keep playing games. Anyone reading this with any intelligence whatsoever can see what you're up to.

Look, let's be honest. I know I'm not trying to convince you of anything here nor any of your cohorts. I think you also know you're not going to convince me of anything. We both have our positions. You, me and the others post because we know others read these threads and most stay silent. Those that stay silent do so because they'll get ridiculed by the likes of you and your cohorts, just as you're now doing to me. Hey I have thick skin and can take it. I'm from Brooklyn

However, looking at the flip side, if I'm wrong, well so what? So they're just mostly harmless CO2 exhaust and no one is worse for the wear. On the other hand, if you're wrong, or worse, helping to cover up what could be considered an illegal act upon humanity and nature, well then exposing that is all worth the effort

Hope you sleep well at night

originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul

originally posted by: Bilk22

originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
a reply to: Bilk22

Oh it certainly does work like that. You cannot testify to the fact that your pic is of contrails. Not in any court and so not here on ATS either.

Not even going to argue that now. Let's say it's true for the moment. Then how in the hell can you claim it's a "chemtrail"? Seriously, think about what you just said.

The evidence for contrails pisses all over the "chemtrail" theory.

As to your "authority claim" - you bow to the government and science - they have both lied before. The Tuskegee Experiment is the perfect example of them both lying. They both still lie - at various times and for various reasons.

sure - but there is no actual evidence they are lying about "chemtrails".

Plus you should apply that standard consistently - "Ordinary people" lie all the time too....so why believe them about this??

There was no evidence of the testing on African American males either during the Tuskegee Experiment. I'm not lying and have nothing to gain by doing so. Not selling a book or anything However if you're lying, you're committing a crime Have a good day

a reply to: soulpowertothendegree

Because the atmospheric conditions change minute by minute.

originally posted by: Bilk22

However, looking at the flip side, if I'm wrong, well so what? So they're just mostly harmless CO2 exhaust and no one is worse for the wear.

If they are wrong they are instilling a culture of fear and anger that could easily lead to someone taking some form of direct action against airliners full of people - there are daily examples of people threatening to shoot down airliners all over the 'net, kill pilots, attack politicians (OK - that one is justified....) - certainly most of them are blowhards.....but it only takes one.

On the other hand, if you're wrong, or worse, helping to cover up what could be considered an illegal act upon humanity and nature, well then exposing that is all worth the effort

Sure - but it ISN'T uncovering anything

Hope you sleep well at night

Thank you - I sure do. You too.