I am a first time poster but I have been reading for years. I'd say since around 2009. I began trying to find out the truth after someone suggested
I watched Zeitgeist. I was tempted to sign up the other day, but this morning I almost died of laughter at this comment to a post:
"To say that Alex Jones viewers only watches his radio show to hear bias information because they want to, is ludicrous to say the lease."
Why else do they watch? How much did the lease cost?
and felt the need to thank the poster for making me laugh. Always good reading content here! However; I do want to follow up with my own thoughts
so I don't go off topic
I did stumble upon the infowars website first, back in 09 but I always wondered if anything Mr. Jones talks about was half accurate why he's still
alive (or how). Watching many of his videos and some where he's being "chased by men with guns" it all seems very extreme with little proof. I
somewhat agree that they probably risk .. something? by doing what they do and his camera men and reporters do too.
The "documents" that I have ever seen Alex Jones put on his videos were always news articles and snippets taken off his own website. To source
yourself is extremely... risky? in the name of journalism, to say the
least. In his defense, I stopped watching his videos fairly early so I
am unsure of any credible sources that he cites, but him sourcing his own website is ridiculous so I mostly stay away. Even a recent video I have
watched where he flips out and throws stacks of paper at the camera all those pages are printouts from his website. I have domains too. I too can
put up a news article about how I have a picture of a pig flying and then print it out and record myself ranting about how it's true because I have a
printout from my website stating that it's true.
As for the drug smuggling video there are a few simple questions to ask to determine if they are where they say they are, and some inconsistencies
that have already been pointed out.
Assuming that they are truly crossing the border in that video (I have not taken any time to confirm geographical location or anything specific) then
whoever is hoaxing the video paid what appears to be a group of mexicans to stage this video and cross the river with bags of stuff.
The video cuts to these 'reporters' in their car and this red SUV being loaded. Ok, all easily attainable to stage this event. Why cut all the
footage between the river and their car though? there's lack of footage which makes them bad reporters.
It appears that if you aren't a well known and/or respected camera man or reporter than any claims as to where you got your footage must be false and
since there isn't even proof that Alex Jones hired them the question 'For Whom?' keeps coming up.
To me, the footage looks real however there's lack of coverage here, but if they are where they say they are, then a smuggling definitely took place.
All this shows is that smuggling is still taking place, as it always has, before obama and after. The footage itself, if real, is a good catch, but
the claim that they were being chased and in hiding is straight up bull and is a main reason why I don't follow infowars.
I am closely connected with some mexicans and it makes me laugh sometimes because sometimes the stereotypes are true. They will do the most
unimaginable things...things that will make you wonder why in Gods name would you ever think to do that, but the possibility of the packages being
loaded in the truck not being drugs is very possible. Like a restaurant owner trying to reload on a special ingredient and his normal supplier didn't
pull through so he had to... outsource. I'm telling you, stuff like that happens. Makes me laugh. So to ask if it was laundry... probably not
laundry... probably drugs... maybe something else. Maybe even a decoy. Which shows even more proof how organized it really is.
Have a great day ATS and thanks for letting me post.
edit on 9-8-2015 by TheFiendishOne because: (no reason given)
edit on 9-8-2015 by TheFiendishOne because: (no reason
given)
edit on 9-8-2015 by TheFiendishOne because: (no reason given)
edit on 9-8-2015 by TheFiendishOne because:
language and typos