Thinly Veiled References To Child Molesting In Media

a reply to: kellyjay

Whoa, um, no. That is merely your interpretation. Even Freud said sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

a reply to: Char-Lee

I don' think you stand against it, the boy is real the joke is not a joke it is sick, the commercial is sick.

You think wrong. The joke is a joke, sick or not. Satire is often "sick" and it doesn't have to be about child molestation. The commercial...well, that's in your head, not mine, nor in a number of others who have posted here.

As far as myself i want the courage to say what should be said regardless

Seems you have it.

originally posted by: pfishy
a reply to: Char-Lee

I promise you that a national restaurant chain is not promoting child molestation in it's advertisements.
Yeah, I kinda thought it was in poor taste, but not for the reasons you do.

Every word and action in a commercial is there for a reason, so I guess you promise none of the politicians in the world or other business owners are pediphiles either?

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

How is joking about which of your children you like better have anything to do with pedophilia?

Maybe you should use the whole and not one line.

a reply to: Char-Lee

No, I make no such promise. But those disgusting acts aren't advertised on national television.

I have a question for you. Do you have children?

a reply to: Char-Lee

Wair he was likely abused on set?.
Dude I don't see owt up with the ad.
I agree with others you are making a mountain out if a molehill.
How about actually making a thread with some real substance to it.

originally posted by: Char-Lee
Maybe you should use the whole and not one line.

What? About not telling mom?

My dad said that once, it was after he said the 'f word' and had nothing to do with him touching my pecker.

You obviously have kiddie porn on the brain.

originally posted by: pfishy
a reply to: kellyjay

Whoa, um, no. That is merely your interpretation. Even Freud said sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

well you did ask....and if they had changed the lines like the original poster said, maybe they recieved complaints from others who read between the lines.

The ATS commnity of 2015:


we've come along way, from a community of thinkers to slanderous wankers, Bravo!

a reply to: kellyjay

You are absolutely correct. I did indeed ask. And thank you for answering me.
Though I must say that what you are calling reading between the lines, I see as misinterpretation. But that's how life works.

This OP was a test in subliminal messaging. After ready the OP, I have this hankering for a Sonic Burger and Shale. Hmmm

a reply to: pfishy

well i think it would be open to several interpretations considering we cant see the advert, one persons misinterpretation is another's interpretation.

you're welcome

a reply to: kellyjay

I've seen it

a reply to: Char-Lee

there was no sexual joke about children.
in this entire thread you are the only one that saw that...
its not there

Cream colored ponies and crisp apple streudels
Doorbells and sleigh bells and schnitzel with noodles

a reply to: PLAYERONE01



awesome movie.
i love justin long in that

the doctor
"yeah it says here your # is all #ed up and you talk like a fag"
hahahahah

originally posted by: pfishy
a reply to: kellyjay

I've seen it

And i havent, so maybe thats why my interpretations differs from yours

a reply to: kellyjay

So, not having seen it yourself, and only knowing what is said in the commercial from a post by another member confidently asserting it was about child molestation, do you think there's a chance you may have been influenced by the power of suggestion?

If you look for something hard enough you're almost always going to find something that at least looks like it.

a reply to: pfishy

The way it was presented may have been a factor yes, i'm not claiming to be correct, its merely my interpretation of the words that were presented thusly...

a reply to: kellyjay

I understand perfectly. Just making sure you had considered the point.