It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: Krazysh0t
That VERY LEGAL thing was not voted on by "we the people". Whoever signed this VERY LEGAL thing into approval needs to be known to us, shown to us, and held accountable for the atrocities against innocent human beings. These are, IMO, CRIMES.
Also, I wonder how those mothers now feel, knowing their babies ended up as pieces and sold by the value of their little organs...?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: borntowatch
Your specious argument was because it was done to less than 3% makes it ok
Seriously is that your/their defence, thats stupid
Just tell the truth, why lie if there is nothing wrong with what they are doing.
Which lie? I've said no lies. In fact, I've backed everything I've said up with links.
court case, so what, it proves nothing, it could be laughed out of court
It's more legal proceedings than the pro-life people have been pushing. They'd rather just skip the whole judicial process and get the Legislative branch to just defund them. Who's being deceptive now?
Lawsuit, you get them from gumball machines in the US, it has no value at all till a judgement is passed.
Tell your porkys to someone else, I wont buy into foolishness.
You are the one buying into all the foolishness that is easily debunked by a plethora of sources.
Baby parts bought and sold by greedy , whatever they are
Lawsuit, seriously is that it, smoke and mirrors
Strawman Fallacy.
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Strawman Fallacy.
After three shocking videos caught Planned Parenthood doctors discussing and arranging the sale of body parts of aborted babies, a fourth video has been released today catching a Planned Parenthood vice president discussing how Planned Parenthood how to break or get around the law to sell aborted babies.
www.lifenews.com...
No its not a strawman its public outrage
If you dont care I understand, its ok to think what you want, its ok for me to think as I want..
PP are lying, the evidence is very clear.
You need to stop telling others what to do and think and go and learn the truth.
Just like christians have evil people in its churches, PP have evil people in its organisation as well.
I cant see how you can be so deluded to the truth, your team?
originally posted by: borntowatch
and why ban the new videos from being released, secrets are lies.
allnewspipeline.com...
What are they hiding, what more evil is being done
Why the secrets, what the hell is going on that stops the truth being revealed
originally posted by: grandmakdw
On another thread Krazy said that the mothers all signed consent forms
and were fully informed .....
but were the women fully informed, really fully informed,
that their "blobs of tissue" would be dissected
and their kidneys, brains, etc
sold rather than donated to research. Hmmmmm
originally posted by: misskat1
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
Have you talked to any who has had an abortion? Because I have, and no they didnt know the fetus would be used in non medical research nor did they know there would be compensation paid to PP for fetal tissue.
If these realities were known and people were properly informed, then there wouldnt be such a passionate overload where this issue is concerned. The videos would have been viewed, people would have said "Oh well, tell us something we didnt know" but instead it has opened a huge can of worms.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: Krazysh0t
So if only 3% of children were taken suddenly, that would be ok?
The infant mortality rate is 7%, so we already appear to be ok with "3% of children being taken suddenly"
Well when illegally obtained videos that misrepresent a VERY legal thing that PP is doing cause the organization come under assault for funding AS WELL AS hacking attempts, you BET I'd be mad at them.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: Krazysh0t
So if only 3% of children were taken suddenly, that would be ok?
The infant mortality rate is 7%, so we already appear to be ok with "3% of children being taken suddenly"
originally posted by: misskat1
Yes it is the patients responsibility. Im sure its all in the fine print. And now its on video, so it can be in everyones noses. No more fine print.
Reply to Krazyshot
originally posted by: TheWhiteKnight
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: Krazysh0t
So if only 3% of children were taken suddenly, that would be ok?
The infant mortality rate is 7%, so we already appear to be ok with "3% of children being taken suddenly"
I believe you read the figure incorrectly. It is .7% in the US.
# 487
originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: Krazysh0t
1. You made my point. The actions of PP SHOULD be made known to us prior to their funding. Had this been done, the outcome likely would have been vastly different.
2. Crimes are a violation of laws. One cannot violate a crime as stated.
3 Are you female? If not, that gives me an insight you cannot have. I know quite alot, having worked alongside a PP office for several years. You know what their staff discusses during outside smoke breaks?.. I do and I have never smoked.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Well when illegally obtained videos that misrepresent a VERY legal thing that PP is doing cause the organization come under assault for funding AS WELL AS hacking attempts, you BET I'd be mad at them.
Meh, you're just mad they got found out and blaming the messenger.
Its okay, you're entitled to that opinion, too…. most people however, are mortified by the message.