It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Are your examples in CA and are they being recorded with a reasonable expectation of privacy? Did the makers of your imaginary videos lie and misrepresent the truth?
Here's the point: the fraudulent "Center for Medical Progress" is a sham corporation and not only committed multiple acts of fraud and slander/libel but were dumb enough to record every episode and distribute it across the internet.
originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: Gryphon66
"Fraudulent" : characterized by, involving, or proceeding from fraud, as actions, enterprise, methods, or gains:
a fraudulent scheme.
On the videos, Planned Parenthood is the outfit that was trying to circumvent LAWS against TRAFFICKING in baby parts for MONEY.
The outfit engaging in CRIMINALITY is Planned Parenthood.
and they have admitted to engaging in fraud and illegal activity
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Gryphon66
and they have admitted to engaging in fraud and illegal activity
I haven't looked in to this group as much as I should have, but do you have a link or something I can look at on this issue? Never heard that they admitted to fraud and illegal activity.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: Gryphon66
"Fraudulent" : characterized by, involving, or proceeding from fraud, as actions, enterprise, methods, or gains:
a fraudulent scheme.
On the videos, Planned Parenthood is the outfit that was trying to circumvent LAWS against TRAFFICKING in baby parts for MONEY.
The outfit engaging in CRIMINALITY is Planned Parenthood.
The videos are edited, chopped together, probably dubbed, etc.
The videos are created by a sham corporation that is staffed by known fraudsters, and they have admitted to engaging in fraud and illegal activity
There is nothing criminal preparing fetal tissue for research, for the humpteenth time.
So ... no. The facts do not bear out your opinions.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: EternalSolace
So, do you think its ok to tape someone without their consent? Would doing so be libel?
What if someone sitting nearby recorded a conversation between you and another person where you discussed embarassing (but legal) facts about yourself. Would it be ok to play that at the next company picnic?
originally posted by: Lostinthedarkness
We have consumer groups filming bad contractors by setting up a sting in good house needs no repair asks for a check on the roof . The bad ones got charged with fraud when they took the bait.
News agencies get a title loan and shows the scam charges filed on the loan company .
news agencies open a shop to catch extortion by officials.
Consumer groups (and police have also ) have set up pawn shops to catch thieves pawning stolen goods.
Consumer groups buy used cars on film have it checked prove it was misrepresented.
Consumer groups took a computer with a simple problem (loose wire) to 10 stores with computer techs filmed the sales pitch on why they needed a new computer.
Consumer groups set up junk yards (and police have also ) and act like its a chop shop to catch car thieves.
Reporters take jobs with to get a story no intention of working just to get the story. Animal rights or sexual misconduct or unsafe working condition the list is long.
When you look at the last 20 years of investigative reporting and compare it to this . You need to ask these questions on the gag order.
Why is Stem express special ?
Why is Planed Parenthood special ?
Could it be PP is a political sacred cow ?
but intent plays a large part in the shall be say appropriatness of a 'sting'.
intent was clearly to malign and defame Planned Parenthood,
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: M5xaz
Do the full videos tell a completely different story from the edited ones?
Probably dubbed, did I say that? Must have slipped my fingers.
No one is selling baby parts.
I'd love to see some facts. Perhaps you'll supply some at some point!
originally posted by: M5xaz
3.IT IS AGAINST THE LAW TO SELL, REPEAT SELL, BABY PARTS. The law is clear, why do you think the PP people where heard trying to get around it?
FACTS get in the way of your bull#.