It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The briefing participants are:
-- John Grunsfeld, associate administrator for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington
-- Jon Jenkins, Kepler data analysis lead at NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California
-- Jeff Coughlin, Kepler research scientist at SETI Institute in Mountain View, California
-- Didier Queloz, professor of astrophysics at Cambridge University, United Kingdom
originally posted by: Tardacus
It can`t be too big of a deal, the head of NASA won`t even be there.The biggest cheese that is going to be there is only an associate administrator.
The briefing participants are:
-- John Grunsfeld, associate administrator for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington
-- Jon Jenkins, Kepler data analysis lead at NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California
-- Jeff Coughlin, Kepler research scientist at SETI Institute in Mountain View, California
-- Didier Queloz, professor of astrophysics at Cambridge University, United Kingdom
originally posted by: Aleister
a reply to: JadeStar
Thanks for all the good information once again. I'll look forward to your observations and comments after whatever news to be announced is announced. On threads like this I'll usually go to your "posts in thread" link and read all of your posts and data at once, and then go back to catch up with everyone else. Again, nice work, and fingers crossed that you'll really enjoy tomorrow's announcement.
Ever heard about disinformation and debunking?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: KarsteinE
This website rationalwiki.org... describes the origin and background of project SERPO.
originally posted by: KarsteinE
Ever heard about disinformation and debunking?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: KarsteinE
This website rationalwiki.org... describes the origin and background of project SERPO.
Thank you so much!
originally posted by: KarsteinE
a reply to: carewemustMaybe so, but first of all, the author(s) of RationalWiki have clearly NOT read all the SERPO files, they are denying things that are not in the documents, they are claiming that the Serpo site says things it does not. And secondly, this information comes from multiple sources other than Serpo's sources. William Cooper presented some of it on a conference (I don't remember exactly when) and not long after he was killed by an anonymous swat team, with the rediculous excuse that he had opposed a house search!
originally posted by: JadeStar
originally posted by: CallYourBluff
I'm sure it will be yet more boring "news" to give the impression of progress in the distraction that is NASA. 66 years from not believing we could fly to landing on the moon and people still believe this planet is unknown and never been visited,amazing.The human ego is a profoundly stubborn and delusional thing.
As a scientist I don't think our planet is unknown if intelligent life is common in our Milky Way galaxy.
Here's why:
Earth has been around for 4.5 billion years and for the last 2 billion of those years, our Earth has been broadcasting that life existed here in terms of our plant life generating biosignatures. These biosignatures would be detectable with technology no greater than we are capable of today out to a spherical area of 300 light years.
That is an area encompassing an estimated 391,725 stars and an estimated 86,180 potentially habitable worlds.
So for the last 2 billion years, an alien astronomer within that 300 light year sphere with technology no greater than our own, looking at our planet with a sufficiently large space telescope would notice that something was filling our atmosphere with free oxygen.
That would stand out to any alien astronomers because oxygen is highly reactive and likes to combine with other elements to form things like carbon monoxide aka smog (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor (H2O) and formaldehyde (CH2O).
So anyone with a sufficiently large space telescope looking at the Earth and seeing a huge spike of O2 (free oxygen) would know something is replenishing it and the only something which does that efficiently for planets like ours, as far as we know, is life. Specifically photosynthetic life (plants, trees, etc).
They'd see something like these:
So yeah, if they're out there they probably at least know our forests are here. Few scientists would argue that. Could they have sent a probe or come here in the past? Maybe. Few scientists would argue that either. Even Carl Sagan suggested we look for evidence of such ancient visitation in images and data returned from our exploration of our solar system.
The only thing most scientists would have an issue with are claims that they are coming here now or are actually here now. There's just nothing which can be examined by science today which would firmly establish that.
BTW: This workshop took place last year in Arizona co-sponsored by The Vatican Observatory:
Another took place this past April in Puerto Rico, one of many of this type these days. It's focus was also on detecting the telltale signs of life on Earthlike worlds in our neighborhood (that 300 light year area I mentioned above):
Personally, I were a smart alien on a planet 100 light years away looking at the Earth with a hyper-telescope capable of seeing something the size of a Honda Accord car I'd probably have seen enough from our year 1915 to stay as far away as possible and observe from the comfort of my own solar system. And in 30 years I and the rest of my alien world could watch World War II unfold.
originally posted by: 3n19m470
a reply to: JadeStar
Thank you so much!
No problem. Some people have a difficulty with picturing themselves in other people's situations. I do not seem to have much of a problem with that. I think I might have a strong sense of empathy. Which leads to sympathy. I don't want anybody to be miserable their whole life as long as they dont have to cause harm to others in order to be happy.
If anybody wants to attack or criticize you because of something you have very little to no control over (I only included very little because, technically, you could "pretend" like everything's ok, have a sham marriage, etc, but thats rediculous to even consider, although I understand the immense pressure that would persuade those who do choose that path... but it hurts to know they may never experience a higher level of happiness) then that is only due to their own shortcomings, not yours.
I don't know how it all works as far as our existence before and after our biological life, so I can't say for sure if, as a spiritual soul-entity before birth, that you didn't choose to challenge yourself in such a way, due to knowing you possessed the strength to overcome it, but, if such a prebirth/pre-conception existence truly does exist, we have no memory of that, and so, for all intents and purposes, it can be said that "you" did not choose this body to be matched up with this mind. So, while it doesn't feel wholly correct to use the word "fault" as if there is something "wrong" with you, as it implies some hurtful ideas, it definitely is Not your fault...
About my suspicions... I'm really just on the fence about the whole thing. You make some good points about having so many people in on it, and the challenges that would entail. But I think there have been some whistleblowers, maybe. Could it be possible the great majority of scientists are kept in the dark?
It's just so rediculous that there almost has to be some hidden agenda.
But it's very irritating because, as a child, I pictured a very different future for humanity. I too, wanted to study space related courses at the UW. But I almost wonder if it would be a waste of time.
I thought there would be thousands of jobs engineering space craft and space stations, studying distant worlds and lifeforms
We are living in the stone age compared to where I think we should be.
There should, as you expressed a desire for, be a much higher education level among the average person, and this would nkt be difficult to acheive either.
It's not very hard to make science fun and interesting. Nor would it cost much, when you consider the amount spent on bombs, jets, helicopters, etc.
Well, you give me hope, for what its worth. I hope they make good use of your ambition and intelligence, and don't waste it on some menial tasks.