Flat Earth Believers, I would like to hear your ideas.

a reply to: Soylent Green Is People

Well how convenient for us citizens with full time jobs and an annual income below the trips price, how nice of them.

a reply to: TerryDon79

A no to what? That you cannot read or are to privileged to do it your self? Its on their website, literally it will take you like two seconds.

originally posted by: NNN87
a reply to: TerryDon79

A no to what? That you cannot read or are to privileged to do it your self? Its on their website, literally it will take you like two seconds.

You made a statement. You have failed to back it up.

Typical flat earther.
-Making statements and gets them remarkably wrong.
-Making statements they can't back up.
-Using the "I haven't seen it so it's not real" bs.

a reply to: TerryDon79


I don't care if your a monkey person, i am not your authority, it is available to everyone equally and you want me to treat you like royalty? I don't owe you nothing, there are matters and subjects one can see, find and read for themselfs, equally.

That is a poor excuse not to educate your self, blaming me for your lack of inquisition.

a reply to: NNN87

And yet another deflection.

YOU made the claim, but YOU can't back it up. Hardly surprised. FE'rs never can.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: NNN87

And yet another deflection.

YOU made the claim, but YOU can't back it up. Hardly surprised. FE'rs never can.

I did not make any claims, i am reiterating what the Antarctica treaty and it's other laws are saying. Which all are available at their website, how is that ignoring your question, that is literally the only answer you ever have.

Is there also an error message playing somewhere deep within your conscience? You just keep repeating yourself.

originally posted by: NNN87

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: NNN87

And yet another deflection.

YOU made the claim, but YOU can't back it up. Hardly surprised. FE'rs never can.

I did not make any claims, i am reiterating what the Antarctica treaty and it's other laws are saying. Which all are available at their website, how is that ignoring your question, that is literally the only answer you ever have.

Is there also an error message playing somewhere deep within your conscience? You just keep repeating yourself.

If that was true, you would be able to copy and paste the part you think is relevant. Your refusal to do so just proves it's not there.

Also, it has already been addressed and shown that it doesn't state what you think it does.

But ignore that, right? Wouldn't want you to actually look at a thread (or 2) that you're posting in.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: NNN87

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: NNN87

And yet another deflection.

YOU made the claim, but YOU can't back it up. Hardly surprised. FE'rs never can.

I did not make any claims, i am reiterating what the Antarctica treaty and it's other laws are saying. Which all are available at their website, how is that ignoring your question, that is literally the only answer you ever have.

Is there also an error message playing somewhere deep within your conscience? You just keep repeating yourself.

If that was true, you would be able to copy and paste the part you think is relevant. Your refusal to do so just proves it's not there.

Also, it has already been addressed and shown that it doesn't state what you think it does.

But ignore that, right? Wouldn't want you to actually look at a thread (or 2) that you're posting in.

Its nothing but what i mentioned covered in natural preservation acts, and the fact that one needs to be a scientist or be designated by one by means of a permit only a scientist or researchers can sometimes receive, and the whole damn thing is just acts upon acts of the same damn thing.

Go to their site and download it, it's only like 54 pages or something, plus other laws which you can download and read over, don't be so lazy.

a reply to: NNN87

So, like I said, you made a claim and can't back it up.

(Backing it up would be, you know, posting the part you're on about)

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: NNN87

So, like I said, you made a claim and can't back it up.

(Backing it up would be, you know, posting the part you're on about)

It's the whole thing, i will provide their website if it pleases you, then you can scroll down and download the file, agreed?

originally posted by: NNN87

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: NNN87

So, like I said, you made a claim and can't back it up.

(Backing it up would be, you know, posting the part you're on about)

It's the whole thing, i will provide their website if it pleases you, then you can scroll down and download the file, agreed?

Like I already stated. You can't prove your point because it's not there.

And on that note, I'm out. You can enjoy your delusions as much as you like. Not like anyone takes flat earthers seriously anyway lol.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: NNN87

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: NNN87

So, like I said, you made a claim and can't back it up.

(Backing it up would be, you know, posting the part you're on about)

It's the whole thing, i will provide their website if it pleases you, then you can scroll down and download the file, agreed?

Like I already stated. You can't prove your point because it's not there.

And on that note, I'm out. You can enjoy your delusions as much as you like. Not like anyone takes flat earthers seriously anyway lol.

So as soon as i agree to provide the link to their official site where you can download the rules and regulations and procedures concerning the shores of Antarctica you bail?

a reply to: NNN87

Maybe copy and paste what you're talking about. Get's a bit messy and lazy for ones like me who read but don't post a lot. You got something, then get it out there on the thread for all to see.

On a different note, I'm drinking, I'm lying on the sofa like a Thunderbird with half his strings cut watching Sky TV. In fact Henry Danger or some thing the kids like but I don't have the energy to get up and turn it off. How is this possible in a flat World? What satellite is my dish pointing at, or is it? oooooo

a reply to: OnionHead

The LORAN system i think its called. Don't need no satellites. There be towers everywhere, and your dish is pointing at one of them.

Go to their website, i can post the link if you wish. But it's the whole thing so pasting it would be the same as you downloading it for your self.

Laziness huh? Is that your people's excuse? If you do not wish to investigate or research, but ridicule instead, that is the very definition of ignorance.

a reply to: pfishy

When I was first told of flat earth, I laughed and / ridiculed my buddy who brought it up. I wasn't sure if he was kidding. So, I began to research it in order to further ridicule...as good friends do. I REALLY wanted to have some clear, undeniable proof to say, "here idiot....look". Unfortunately, I couldn't do that. Here is one reason:

Gyroscopes...if you know gyroscopic theory, then you know that they do not respect gravity, they have a rotational inertia that causes them to remain in the plane in which they are spinning...thats what they want to keep doing. So, an actively spinning gyroscope sitting in a gimble that is affixed to the rotating earth should start to appear to angle as time goes by (because it stays locked in the plane perpendicular to its axis of rotation while the earth roates the gyroscope within 3D space). Within 6 hrs from start, the "round spinning earth" should make a gyroscope that was started spinning parallel to the earth's surface, now appear perpendicular to the earth's surface (as the earth rotates 360 degrees in 24hrs, so 6hrs the gyroscope should rotate in the gimble by 90 degrees).

On top of that, gyroscopes should appear, to earthbound observers, to be going crazy all the time, but they appear level and never seem to deviate, DESPITE the "fact" that the earth is rotating on its axis at 1,000 mph. It also rotates around the sun at 67,000 mph. PLUS the whole solar system of planets and the sun, rotates around the center of the galaxy at 490,000 mph. Then of course, there is the Milky Way which is supposed to be rushing headlong at 600 miles per second towards the "Great Attractor", which is a region of space 150 million miles away.

SOOOOO.....given that the spinning globe, rotating around the sun, which is rotating around the galaxy, which is rushing towards some location in space at 600 miles per second, wouldn't you think that gyroscopes would be a very messed up way of navigating? How the hell could we POSSIBLY calibrate them enough to use them in aerospace applications without some EXTREMELY advanced computational math with microservos to constantly recalibrate as we spiral through the universe on a spinning surface. But no....gyroscopes are purely mechanical and they don't have these things in them and they remain quite level.

I would love for someone to explain how this is at all possible if we are actually moving psychotically fast through the universe on a crazy spiral path.

a reply to: NNN87

Satellites are viewable via the naked eye. I went through a phase of tracking the ISS , but once you've seen it, well you've seen it. Tracking via the website is as you'd expect, accurate.

As you may have gathered I believe the flat Earth theory to be a pile of horse #e, for many reasons, and I'll give you another example (And to name but a few) :

Isaac Newton, Galileo, Einstein, Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan, Brian Cox. (Quite the dream team). Were/Are they all wrong? Mistaken even? It's these handful of great minds vs the flat Earth believers. Would you bet your right arm on the Earth being flat? Naaa, but I'd have a bet on it being spherical any day of the week.

a reply to: OnionHead

Would you bet your right arm on the Earth being flat? Naaa, but I'd have a bet on it being spherical any day of the week.

I hope you are not attached to it.

a reply to: TheFaceOfTheEarth

Have a star, that one works for me