It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
It matters not what position you hold...
Haggling prices kind of negates the idea that it's a non-profit org whose entire argument (legal, not moral) suggests that it's all transfer expenses etc...
If that's the case...
Those prices do not change...
So why haggle unless you're looking to line your pockets...
nailed it I was thinking along those lines..Lamborghini anyone? if indeed it's standard procedure they wouldn't be lunching over prices.
1) someone is abusing their position...
Or...
2) PP sanction this behaviour and are not at all non-profit.
A law is being broken.
Outrage win!
Edit: Or 3) it's none of the above and standard procedure of donations.edit on 21-7-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: Edit for impartiality!!!
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Hillary Clinton received the Margaret Sanger award. Why hasn't she spoken up in defense of Planned Parenthood in the midst of this controversy?
Probably because her campaign tacticians can't figure out a politically correct angle yet.
originally posted by: Ignatian
Expect a new video every week for the next 5 or 6 weeks. It's going to be a long, hot summer. This disgusting organization is going to be exposed for the evil entity it truly is.
a reply to: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Thorlongus22
www.lds.org...
I invite all but especially Pro Choicers to read this.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: introvert
Even the article says the only thing Planned Parenthood is going to have to explain is how the prices cited differently even though it was the actors who offered a higher price.
originally posted by: everyone
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: introvert
Even the article says the only thing Planned Parenthood is going to have to explain is how the prices cited differently even though it was the actors who offered a higher price.
when planned parenthood accepts that offer they are as wrong as when they would ask the price themselves.
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: everyone
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: introvert
Even the article says the only thing Planned Parenthood is going to have to explain is how the prices cited differently even though it was the actors who offered a higher price.
when planned parenthood accepts that offer they are as wrong as when they would ask the price themselves.
Oh how dare you include facts. You know we have to keep this either an emotional or religious issue shame on you.
originally posted by: everyone
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: introvert
Even the article says the only thing Planned Parenthood is going to have to explain is how the prices cited differently even though it was the actors who offered a higher price.
when planned parenthood accepts that offer they are as wrong as when they would ask the price themselves.
originally posted by: everyone
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: introvert
Even the article says the only thing Planned Parenthood is going to have to explain is how the prices cited differently even though it was the actors who offered a higher price.
when planned parenthood accepts that offer they are as wrong as when they would ask the price themselves.
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: everyone
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: introvert
Even the article says the only thing Planned Parenthood is going to have to explain is how the prices cited differently even though it was the actors who offered a higher price.
when planned parenthood accepts that offer they are as wrong as when they would ask the price themselves.
Oh how dare you include facts. You know we have to keep this either an emotional or religious issue shame on you.
originally posted by: StoutBroux
Geez, another person against a women's choice of her body. OMG, here we go again.