It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
Giving LGBT people equal rights was easy. They're physically attached to another person and depend on them for growth, sustenance, life, blood, etc, etc.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
I don't get it.
Anti-abortionists usually want smaller government. . . but they want the government to tell people what they can and can't do?
We just want equal rights for the human beings that aren't born yet. Was giving LGBT equal rights a burden as well?
So...it's OK to have big government sometimes, if it aligns with your personal moral compass?
I'd ask the same.
An unborn child's rights are a little murky, because they're technically PART of the mother until such time that they're born, which, legally, the date of birth is the date a fetus becomes a person.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Guidance.Is.Internal
Aside from the moral arguments...ethically speaking, should an organization that is tasked to council/educate/assist women and girls considering abortion also be profiting from aborted fetuses
Watching her creepy, nonchalant, disaffected, vulture-like demeanor when talking about the profit potential to be mined from possibly the worst moment of a woman's life - I'd say hell no.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Guidance.Is.Internal
Aside from the moral arguments...ethically speaking, should an organization that is tasked to council/educate/assist women and girls considering abortion also be profiting from aborted fetuses
Watching her creepy, nonchalant, disaffected, vulture-like demeanor when talking about the profit potential to be mined from possibly the worst moment of a woman's life - I'd say hell no.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: beezzer
What if it was determined not to have any awareness or consciousness, but simply a mass of tissue?
originally posted by: Watcher777
a reply to: reldra
Your right 3% of what they do is abortions but 36% of their revenue is from those abortions. They are not advocates for women and girls, many many times young girls are molested or raped and guess who take these children in for their abortions, the perpetrators. Planned Parenthood is not regulated the way it should be.
I have seen girls go in 2-3 times for abortions, before the age of 18, all paid for by welfare. Most girls were from families that by no means were entitled to welfare, but Planned Parenthood told these girls how to apply and get it..sounds like welfare fraud to me.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: ~Lucidity
Puhlease. Semantics.
How much does she make?
PP wouldn't be able to open it's door if someone wasn't profiting. I rate this kind of "nonprofit" the same as the Komen Foundation....simply preying on women and their health and fears. A non-stop plea for funding using emotion and scare tactics.
It's straight up ghoulish but couched in PC justifications.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: beezzer
A one month year old baby out of the womb is certainly aware of its surroundings. It responds to visual and auditory stimuli.
Is there any neural activity in the brain of a fetus at the age in which abortions are happening?
originally posted by: kosmicjack
How much does she make?
originally posted by: galadofwarthethird
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
Its not surprising like somebody said. Were there is a buck to be made somebody will be there to fill the gap.
This is not new, years ago there was even another about how they were using dead fetuses for anything from stem cells to selling them to the cosmetic industry for use in there products, to other less savory things. They even got caught dumping them in the dumpster out back in emergency room of one of these clinics in one story, I guess things were just not booming then.
And well you take your pick, like the female Representative in the vid said, "yesterday was the first time she said people wanted lungs" Don't know how much use a fetus lung would be as its likely not even formed. But I am sure its used for something.
As for this whole pro and con fetus life thing. Not my business, if anything females out to charge more for there leavings, seeing as they are making a sumfull of money of this business. Either way, its people being people.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: ~Lucidity
How much does she make?
originally posted by: beezzer
Giving GLBT their equal rights is so different from giving an unborn child equal rights?
Except that, as Planned Parenthood told The Hill, its affiliates “can legally receive reimbursement from a tissue donation procedure for the ‘additional expenses related tissue donation, which can vary based on individual circumstance,’ but it does not go to staff members or providers.” These “additional expenses” might be the $10-30 it costs to transport the tissue being donated, which Planned Parenthood notes is “standard across the medical field.” And no, the patient donating the tissue doesn’t receive any financial reimbursement either.
In reality, the donation of fetal tissue is no different than any other situation in which a patient might donate tissue to scientific research. No money changes hands, and the donation could help pave the way to any number of medical breakthroughs.
...
The video itself opens with a short clip of Planned Parenthood president Gloria Feldt that is edited to give the appearance of condemning the recorded conversation that follows. But the 20/20 segment on which Feldt appears is actually an investigation into abuses made by private sector “tissue and organ procurement companies.” And Feldt even went on to later affirm that “Planned Parenthood supports research using fetal tissue in accordance with legal and ethical guidelines and are deeply concerned about the attempt by some to profit from the humanitarian contributions of courageous women.”