It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Doom and Gloom
I'm pretty sure that animal loving violates some sort of consent law since the animal can't technically consent to it...
originally posted by: Annee
Who decided marriage is between "One Woman & One Man" in the first place?
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Doom and Gloom
I'm pretty sure that animal loving violates some sort of consent law since the animal can't technically consent to it...
That's my response every time someone thinks that bringing up a slippery slope of marrying an animal as if it's an intelligent argument--it just makes them feel stupid when I do, because it's like a bombshell is dropped that they never considered that marriage needs signatures from two people.
originally posted by: Darth_Prime
a reply to: Krazysh0t
And Women should have the right to have multiple spouses also
originally posted by: Darth_Prime
a reply to: Krazysh0t
And Women should have the right to have multiple spouses also
originally posted by: Agartha
originally posted by: Darth_Prime
a reply to: Krazysh0t
And Women should have the right to have multiple spouses also
Yep.... the only downside to this is having 2 mothers in law!!
There are very clear, logical, and GOOD reasons not to legalize incestuous marriages (children have birth defects)
originally posted by: whyamIhere
I honestly think this kind of cheapens what was just accomplished.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Doom and Gloom
I'm pretty sure that animal loving violates some sort of consent law since the animal can't technically consent to it...