It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kapriti
The problem with NATO is that very few expect the USA, the UK, France, etc. will be there for them should the Russians try to seize territory or invade.
originally posted by: babybunnies
originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: the2ofusr1
I've tried to find alternate sources for that, but it seems the only sites carrying the story are all Russian, which makes me think we might need to take that with a pinch of salt..
It was on CNN ticker this afternoon, barely mentioned but was flashed briefly a few times. Certainly got me interested as to why they would want to do this unless they're gearing up to try and legally justify an invasion.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: stumason
My source is from Canada while your BBC source is from Russia .
A source at the prosecutor's office, quoted by Russia's Interfax news agency, said the investigation into the Baltic states' independence followed a request from two parliamentary deputies.
Are you saying that only sources of information from outside Russia are truthful or reliable ?
originally posted by: Greathouse
I can actually agree with your assessment in the current climate of Neville Chamberlain politics . But sadly if an attack occurs article 5 will be honored and once again American boys will spill their blood in Europe's defense .
originally posted by: EA006
originally posted by: Greathouse
I can actually agree with your assessment in the current climate of Neville Chamberlain politics . But sadly if an attack occurs article 5 will be honored and once again American boys will spill their blood in Europe's defense .
If Russia attacked Europe beyond the Baltic states American troops in Europe would be the primary target.
originally posted by: EA006
originally posted by: Greathouse
I can actually agree with your assessment in the current climate of Neville Chamberlain politics . But sadly if an attack occurs article 5 will be honored and once again American boys will spill their blood in Europe's defense .
If Russia attacked Europe beyond the Baltic states American troops in Europe would be the primary target.
originally posted by: Greathouse
I can actually agree with your assessment in the current climate of Neville Chamberlain politics . But sadly if an attack occurs article 5 will be honored and once again American boys will spill their blood in Europe's defense .
originally posted by: seagull
The US would have no choice. Were, god forbid, Putin do something like order the invasion of the Baltic states, Obama would not dare do nothing. He'd be done.
originally posted by: Kapriti
a reply to: stumason
Anyone who recalls Chamberlain and the Franco-British sell-out of Czechoslovakia has extremely limited faith in NATO. And my colleagues in the Baltics don't think NATO will lift a pinky should the Russians engage in a lightning invasion. The stories we in the Anglo-sphere tell ourselves about our heroes, our nobility, and the sacrifice of our people for the sake of others ... these are regarded as masturbatory fantasies by many who lived under the Warsaw Pact.