Planet X just revealed by Google Sky? Black swath gone, ‘winged disk’ visible

a reply to: EndOfDays77
Did you really just cite poleshift.ning, zetatalk, and dutchsinse as sources, all in the same post?

Credibility: zero

a reply to: Black_Fox

That's a lot to conclude just by looking at a blurry, smudged-looking pic.

Let's embrace the harvest. Even if we die, at least the suckers die too and don't make any further damage on the people.

a reply to: EndOfDays77

So your source is pretty much Nancy Lieder. Why didn't Planet X come through the solar sstem the last three times she said it would? Furthermore how are the planets' orbits so stable if a large mass object comes through the inner solar system on a regular schedule?

a reply to: mysticrecluse

Or they have been paid off to remain silenced, or threatened, hmmm?

a reply to: 3danimator2014

I will spend my FREE time where I choose, thank you. You know nothing about my educational background and, I feel, are intentionally condescending.

Either that or I haven't had enough hot chi tea this morning and my cranky factor is set on stun.

originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: 3danimator2014

I will spend my FREE time where I choose, thank you. You know nothing about my educational background and, I feel, are intentionally condescending.

Either that or I haven't had enough hot chi tea this morning and my cranky factor is set on stun.

Im not commenting about you. Im commenting about your lack of scientific knowledge on the subject of this thread. That you think that astronomers can track inbound small lumps of rock is astounding enough. But that you (and others) dont seem to fathom the effect that Planet X would have on EVERY SINGLE planet in the solar system is just mind boggling. Its been explained, over and over and over again.

The science is simple enough for schoolkids to get, but you ( meaning also all you planetx believers) feel the need to ignore such mundane facts such as gravity in order to play make believe.

I dont get it. The universe is exciting enough...you dont need to make up stuff.

originally posted by: admirethedistance
a reply to: EndOfDays77
Did you really just cite poleshift.ning, zetatalk, and dutchsinse as sources, all in the same post?

Credibility: zero

yes, i did a double take followed by a big sigh when i saw these sources...

a reply to: Black_Fox

For years it has been speculated by conspiracy theorists and some astronomers that Google Sky had been censoring what’s known as Planet X or Nibiru from the general public’s view online.

This is a blatant lie. Not one astronomer is stupid enough to think that Google is censoring Nibiru out of its Google Sky software. This thread belongs in [HOAX!]

I see you all are blindly believing to something that someone say to you. Because they have money and are big named corporation you believe them. No, they would not do that, they are honest and they like people. They don't want money at all, that why they are a big corporation with big money that they don't want it, but somehow money is just leaking into their pockets.

Now when that is sad: I don't believe Google, nor NASA nor other corrupt scientists that make science for money. But it is also hard to believe that they will censor it in so unfashioned way. They have power, they could easy place a fake picture and nobody will know it. But then again I really would like to know official reason why there was a black rectangle?

Now about spotting the planets:
I m not scientists, but I know that is harder to see closer objects to earth, objects that are inside Sun and Earth, then objects that are outside and far away from Sun than earth. That could be a reason why amateurs can't see that objects. To watch something in a direction of Sun you need to have a very expensive equipment and I m afraid not all of the people have this.

oh crap - this cannot be happening

i was convinced - YUP CONVINCED that the plenet ex hoax died in 2003 - then again in 2004 - it breifly resurected in 2007 - but its DEAD damm it

now this shiite

whats the claim :

oh --- google sky ..................... yup that cutting edge astronomy data set that every astronomer in the world relies on

FFS - the legion of the incompetant is really REALLY scraping the barrel here .

a reply to: 3danimator2014

I got my info from NASA. Are you equally discounting what they say?

Do you practice at being rude or come by it naturally?

info straight from NASA.

"Nasa surprised by Chelyabinsk Meteor" is the title to the story on the internet. Google it yourself. I would do it for you but your total assholiness makes me resist.

a reply to: Ultralight

comparing a meteor to a planet with the attibutes claimed for planet ex is so freaking retarded - it defies belief

a reply to: Ultralight

Spotting an object a few dozen meters in diameter and a planet hundreds, if not thousands of kilometers in diameter are two very different things.

a reply to: Black_Fox

I don't mean to be negative, but the picture looks fake.

originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: 3danimator2014

I got my info from NASA. Are you equally discounting what they say?

Do you practice at being rude or come by it naturally?

info straight from NASA.

"Nasa surprised by Chelyabinsk Meteor" is the title to the story on the internet. Google it yourself. I would do it for you but your total assholiness makes me resist.

Oh dear. please tell me that you didnt just read the title of the article and make an assumption about what its about? Tell you what, just to be nice to you, i wont say anymore other than...they were not suprised because they didnt see it coming.

It helps if you actually READ the articles you are citing



There are HUNDREDS of rock fragments that hit the earth every day. These are not and cannot be tracked or predicted. if they could then they would tell people "look out for a great fireball on 29th july 9pm" etc...

Not only that, but as i said, they have absolutely nothing to do with discovering planets/comets etc...

a reply to: saadad

Now about spotting the planets:
I m not scientists, but I know that is harder to see closer objects to earth, objects that are inside Sun and Earth, then objects that are outside and far away from Sun than earth. That could be a reason why amateurs can't see that objects. To watch something in a direction of Sun you need to have a very expensive equipment and I m afraid not all of the people have this.

Wrong. You can go outside at sunset tonight and see the planet Venus with your naked eye. Venus is closer to the Sun than Earth, which pretty definitively proves your statement wrong. Anyone with a clear dark sky and a $200 telescope would be able to see Nibiru if it existed. I know hundreds of non-corporate flunky astronomers, both professional and amateur. Not one has ever seen Nibiru.

originally posted by: saadad

I m not scientists, but I know that is harder to see closer objects to earth, objects that are inside Sun and Earth, then objects that are outside and far away from Sun than earth. That could be a reason why amateurs can't see that objects. To watch something in a direction of Sun you need to have a very expensive equipment and I m afraid not all of the people have this.

Im afraid to say that you are totally, completely wrong about this.