It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: roadgravel
originally posted by: sociolpath
a reply to: Jaellma
what is up with the fat white guy refereeing this abusive cop? If the man didn't have a uniform the civilians standing by would not have put up with treating someone in an abusive way like that.
I wondered why he wasn't considered interfering given how close he kept getting to the action. Good old boy.
He was probably a community security guard. Some of the articles say they're the ones who called the police after they couldn't control the situation.
originally posted by: Khaleesi
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
a reply to: Khaleesi
As for the rest, the issue here is the actions of an out-of-control cop who was targeting only certain kids in a very large group milling around. If they all sneaked in, why throw around and arrest only kids of one color?
This is what you said. Maybe you intended to say something about 'from the video we have available' but that isn't what you said.
originally posted by: manuelram16
Just another case of the MSM playing the RACE card on police trying to do their job.
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
originally posted by: manuelram16
Just another case of the MSM playing the RACE card on police trying to do their job.
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
Here is a linkwww.buzzfeed.com...
Guy gives n=me the creeps, honestly.
originally posted by: roadgravel
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: roadgravel
originally posted by: sociolpath
a reply to: Jaellma
what is up with the fat white guy refereeing this abusive cop? If the man didn't have a uniform the civilians standing by would not have put up with treating someone in an abusive way like that.
I wondered why he wasn't considered interfering given how close he kept getting to the action. Good old boy.
He was probably a community security guard. Some of the articles say they're the ones who called the police after they couldn't control the situation.
Wearing shorts and t-shirt. Undercover I suppose.
originally posted by: Answer
I've had a lot of interaction with McKinney PD and, amazingly, I've never had a single problem with them. McKinney is a very nice city and is mostly peaceful and low on crime.
Funny how some people just can't seem to avoid the "bad cops"...
Reporting to your parole officer, you say? A nonsense story, you say? Hmm...
originally posted by: Greven
originally posted by: Answer
I've had a lot of interaction with McKinney PD and, amazingly, I've never had a single problem with them. McKinney is a very nice city and is mostly peaceful and low on crime.
Funny how some people just can't seem to avoid the "bad cops"...
Reporting to your parole officer, you say? A nonsense story, you say? Hmm...
Seems like you have a personal stake in this. Possibly more so than anyone else in this thread.
You also have clearly chosen a side. Perhaps you might consider that such a thing is premature.
originally posted by: Answer
Nope. I don't have a personal stake at all. I just know an unfounded dog-pile session when I see one and that's generally what people do on ATS whenever a cop is involved.
See my post above if you want to see why jumping to conclusions is such a monumentally stupid idea.
The motto of this site is "deny ignorance" but whenever a cop is involved, people default to "the cop was wrong" and after the facts come out, the anti-cop crowd are almost always wrong.
If anything in this thread can be considered "premature," it's the geniuses who jumped on the "racist white cops beating up innocent black teens" bandwagon before they had any facts.
The girl who was put on the ground by the officer was interfering and refusing to obey commands.
A case before the Supreme Court of the United States yields some answers about the factors that led McKinney residents to call the police in the first place. Some time this month, the court will render its verdict in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.—which draws on the racial and housing divisions exposed in McKinney this past weekend. McKinney specifically is connected to the Supreme Court case, and the future for this suburb and many others like it is bound to the court’s decision.
According to District Court filings from 2009, east McKinney is (or was very recently) about 50 percent white, while west McKinney is almost 90 percent white.
But the Supreme Court case that now concerns McKinney is larger than any single exclusionary amenity. The Roberts court may redefine exclusionary zoning altogether. What the Supreme Court does next will decide whether residents of McKinney—and Flower Mound, and Lewisville, and Sunnyvale, and Frisco, and suburbs and cities far beyond Dallas and Texas—can erect informal barriers to keep poor black residents not just out of their pools, but out of white, wealthy areas in an altogether more profound way.
"He told me to keep walking," Dajerria Becton, 15, told Fox 4. "And I kept walking and then I'm guessing he thought we were saying rude stuff to him."
"He grabbed me, twisted my arm on my back and shoved me in the grass and started pulling the back of my braids," Becton said. "I was telling him to get off me because my back was hurting bad