It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
It wouldn't change that all three want to be top dog, and China feels it doesn't need the help.
China could surpass America on its own if it plays its cards right, so why make a useless alliance with India or Russia? To create two future rivals for no reason?
The technology isn't suddenly going to increase. None of them really know much the others don't.
America has been wildly unpopular before. People hated Reagan as much as they do Bush. America didn't collapse then.
And could all of the varius Russians out there speaking in broken English try real arguments for a change, instead of calling all Americans dumb, ignorant and brainwashed? You know, real facts might be useful. How about a few sources to back up your claims for once?
Hey man are you on drugs OR WHAT ?! the reason I put those number up is to show U.S.A. did not WIN THE KOREAN WAR THOSE NUMBERS HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED BY YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT SO WHAT IN THE WORLD ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT IN YOUR POST???????? your own Government said MiG 15 shot 1035 F- 80/84/86's down and MiGs that were shot down by USAF were only 335 so what you said in your previous post makes absolutly no scence dude!
I JUST GAVE YOU YOUR OWN GOV's you have shown me you have been deafeated in this argument and the only thing you have left is now to use funny little staement like that as if I haven't just proven you wrong hhahahahaahahahahahahahahahaah nighty night for now
English-language works dealing specifically with Soviet and Chinese participation in the Korean War remain relatively few in number. Dr. Xiaoming Zhang, a member of the faculty at Texas A&M International University, has filled a portion of that gap with a first-rate history of the important role played by the air forces of the two communist giants in that still-unresolved conflict. Zhang draws on a vast array of Chinese, Soviet, and American sources. Readers will find his description of Korean War air operations from the Soviet and Chinese perspective quite illuminating.
...
Although he spends a fair amount of time trying to bring balance to what he sees as inflated US �kill ratios,� Zhang agrees with most Western historians that the communist air forces failed to achieve the air superiority they repeatedly sought over the USAF or even to provide desperately needed protection and close air support to communist ground forces suffering under a furious US and UN air assault. Only now, in the face of America�s post�Gulf War, high-tech air dominance, is China turning its back on its Korean War experience, which, in Zhang�s view, shackled it to an outdated and ineffective defensive mind-set.
You also contradicted your own nations ratio U.S. said 10:1 kill but you stated 3:1 (even if you didn't state this U.S. still lost)
1.now why is it when we read YANK'S versions of events that include Rus there are always "HOLES IN THE STORY?" = Inteligent Answer #1= Because the said version (Yank Version to be exact) of the events are Yank "LIE PROPAGANDA
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
The reason China has yet to rise to superpower status is that they kept themselves cut off, and their economy was state controlled. You can't grow like that.
If China accepts a capitalist system, theire economy will surpass America's eventually. Right now, they're doing a good job of achieving that.
I fail to see why you'd talk about their current military strength. It doesn't matter much because they don't plan on going to war with America, at least not anytime in the near future.
They're updating their millitary just enough to keep Taiwan in check. That's why most of their modern equipment is focused towards Taiwan.
China knows that once their economy is up to the task, they can develop the military power, and they can use the Russian military equipment, plus some of the Western material they've been able to pick up from Europe and Israel to surpass America.
China doesn't need Russia or India.
Hehe...as you wish, IMHO China will reach critical mass very soon and it will need to expand its sphere of influence into regions with vital resources and they will not be able to do it w/o Russia and/or India.
China has an upper hand now in the tech/industrial market now because its on a growth wave, there is no uniqueness in the services its provides, there are many waiting to take over. Its major advantage now is the cheapness of products offered which is due to the availibility of a large workforce.
If a chinese warship ever wants to dosey-doe in international waters and show the finger to an american counter part, it needs India and Russia to do so...
whoa there just a sec..did CCCP fighter pilots actually engage american counterparts in the korean war?? NO WAY...they never did!! I WANT proof to show that they did
Infact now that one thinks about it..the ruskies haven't engaed in air war ever since WWII..so just shut that arguement up there u ppl!!
The only true evenly matched encounters between russian and american equipment have in Indo-Pak wars..and we all knwo how those turned out.
What it also showed was that other countries need to unite against this imperialistic force to bring balance to the force(world)
NO ONE DOUBTS that thats true because they beleive YANK PROPAGANDA t MOST YANK POPULATION WOULD BELEIVE THAT also because there STUPID. Now YANKS realy beleive terrorists are coming outta the sky about to take down the U.S. 19 high jackers commited 9/11 Hussien was a threat he worked with BenLaden yea, yea we gotta get him if people are DUMB enough to beleive all these "FANTASTIC" propaganda of the past they'll be DUMB enough to beleive all this 9/11-Operation Iraq Freedom HOAX too so now we know the kind of people we Russkies are dealing with DUMB YANKS and I mean that with NO EXAGGERATION
Funny my reply hasn't been.....replied to but one thing if we are talking about american propaganda then yes i have seen it first hand.
During the election every station had propaganda on it even the cartoon shows had them in it.
Even disney had it to a degree!
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
Care to give some actual examples?
It's hard to make propaganda in a country with two parties. It would most likely be anti-Bush if it were mainstream, as well. Something like 90% of national reporters in America supported Kerry.
[edit on 4-1-2005 by Disturbed Deliverer]